On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
In general, I have been giving a lots of thoughts to the Sugar Labs
BugSquad (e.g. what additions we need in trac and the general workflow
http://sugarlabs.org/go/BugSquad/StatusFields). At the moment I am
waiting a
Schampijer si...@schampijer.de
Subject: Re: [IAEP] FUDcon + XOCamp talks
To: Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org
Cc: iaep iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
Message-ID: 495a0e89.7070...@schampijer.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Hello
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Hello,
so we are going to be officially present at FUDcon and I assume some
of us will also stay for XOCamp. Is anyone planning to give talks?
Here is what I have in mind. I think Simon also had something.
FUDcon:
* Discussion about packaging activities. xo
#Attendees
Thanks,
Greg S
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:05:29 +0100
From: Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de
Subject: Re: [IAEP] FUDcon + XOCamp talks
To: Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org
Cc: iaep iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
Message-ID: 495a0e89.7070...@schampijer.de
Content-Type: text
Hello,
so we are going to be officially present at FUDcon and I assume some
of us will also stay for XOCamp. Is anyone planning to give talks?
Here is what I have in mind. I think Simon also had something.
FUDcon:
* Discussion about packaging activities. xo vs rpm, how do solve
maintenance
I would love to also hear a discussion about what Sugar features we
should be targeting for incorporation upstream as more general
utilities--e.g., upstream collaboration tools, upstream data-store
tools, etc. This would give us more long-term stability and broaden
our reach.
-walter
On Sat, Dec
