I'm using Trisquel on a Sugar Toast 4.51 and noticed that the
autoupdater wants me to install Scratch, although its non-free both by
Trisquel's definition and Sugar Activity Library policy. This is
critical in a Free distribution like Trisquel, where we take the effort
to rebrand for instance
Chris Ball wrote on Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:16:46 -0400
On Sun, Jun 05 2011, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
The very short summary is that there are two different licenses for
Scratch: one for the source code, which prohibits calling the resulting
binary Scratch and uploading projects to the website,
I blogged about this issue, citing comments here from tom, myself and pamela
and mitch resnick has replied on my blog (3rd comment)
http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2008/11/scratch-license-disappointment.html
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Pamela Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um. If you
Scratch forum:
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=77320#p77320
From Andres Monroy-Hernandez, Scratch Team at the MIT Media Lab:
There has been some discussion in the Scratch Team about this. Overall our
concern is to avoid forks. In general forks are good because bring diversity
but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tom, Bill and others,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:34:28PM -0500, Tom Hoffman wrote:
Scratch is, or should be a trademark.
[details snipped]
Mozilla has very strict terms for trademark use -- so much so that it
is called Iceweasel in Debian:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Bill Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mitch Resnick responded to my query as follows. I replied by saying I was
not an expert on licensing and / or open source but that people on the IAEP
list (and Tom) would be certain to provide some useful feedback.
Hi Bill.
Might I suggest that you contact the Software Freedom Law Center? They
do stuff like this precisely. Trying to do a license without a lawyer
these days is like pinning a bull's eye on your project.
PJ
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tom, Bill and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 10:53:05PM +1030, Bill Kerr wrote:
I recently discovered, that MIT had changed the Scratch license from
free to non commercial
That is indeed sad news! :-(
On reading the threads about the Squeak / Etoys / Debian issues
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 10:53:05PM +1030, Bill Kerr wrote:
I recently discovered, that MIT had changed the Scratch license from
free to non commercial
That is indeed sad
I recently discovered, that MIT had changed the Scratch license from free to
non commercial
On reading the threads about the Squeak / Etoys / Debian issues then it
would appear to me that this will effect the distribution of Scratch on
Sugar to Debian at least, perhaps others
Tom Hoffman wrote
I have edited my initial post on this thread and posted to the Scratch
forum:
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=76772#p76772
(also forwarded a copy to mitch resnick and invited him to comment here)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project
11 matches
Mail list logo
