2017-09-06 20:04 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender :
> As I said earlier, I don't think SLOB should be involved in the details of
> who is a member of this committee or that committee.
>
We should be trusting the community. That said, I agree with James -- we
> need more
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:36:03PM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Not even I should vote on any motion related to the current
> electoral process until current election calendar terminates on
> October 15, 2017 as it could be defined as a "Conflict of Interest".
(a) the motion 2017-14 which was
As I said earlier, I don't think SLOB should be involved in the details of
who is a member of this committee or that committee. We should be trusting
the community. That said, I agree with James -- we need more transparency
from the committee. For example, when the "Sugar Labs Membership and
2017-09-06 19:24 GMT-05:00 James Cameron :
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:00:24PM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote:
> > In my opinion the motion haven't pass yet as have only 3 valid votes
> > in favor: Walter as 1 of the 4 candidates for the 2017-2019
> > elections should abstain to
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:00:24PM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote:
> In my opinion the motion haven't pass yet as have only 3 valid votes
> in favor: Walter as 1 of the 4 candidates for the 2017-2019
> elections should abstain to avoid any direct interference with the
> current election process he is
Thanks.
I don't think adding more Sugar Labs members to the membership and
elections committee will increase transparency.
Practices that will increase transparency are;
- make open the discussions, meetings, minutes, and decisions of the
committee,
- make open the collective actions of the
On Sep 7, 2017 1:00 AM, "Laura Vargas" wrote:
2017-09-06 18:09 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy :
> Thank you James,
>
> The reason we want more members is due to the current members are all
> SLOBS and since we will be having elections it is wise to have
2017-09-06 18:09 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy :
> Thank you James,
>
> The reason we want more members is due to the current members are all
> SLOBS and since we will be having elections it is wise to have some
> non-SLOBS member in, for sake of transparency.
>
>
>
Samson
>
>
I
Thank you James,
The reason we want more members is due to the current members are all SLOBS
and since we will be having elections it is wise to have some non-SLOBS
member in, for sake of transparency.
Samson
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:05 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> Good that
Good that the motion passed, but I'll comment anyway. ;-)
Pericherla Seetaramaraju and Hirish Patel are not Sugar Labs members
yet. On the other hand, nor am I.
My opinion is that it is up to the membership and elections committee
who they invite to their meetings and who they collaborate
The motion already passed.
Both of them are going to sign up for Sugar Labs membership, which they can
easily do.
I guess this motion passed.
Pericherla and Hrishi, the next step to take is to formally sign up as a
Sugar Labs member[1].
Congrats
[1]
Samson,
I would support a motion to add Ibiam to the Membership and elections
Committee since Ibiam is a Sugar Labs member.
Not sure it works for non Sugar Labs members.
Regards,
Laura V
Membership and Elections Committee Liaison
2017-09-06 16:02 GMT-05:00 Samson Goddy
Hello,
I am requesting to SLOB. To add Pericherla Seetaramaraju (Google Summer of
Code Intern), Hirish Patel (Contributor and Google Summer of Code Mentor)
and Ibiam Chihurumnaya (Member of Sugar Labs). I mentioned at the meeting
that we need more members in the Membership/Election committee.
13 matches
Mail list logo