more inline
and reviewing, highlighting/ commenting on the original
posting/ thread below that...
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Thu, 9/24/09, DancesWithCars danceswithc...@gmail.com wrote:
From: DancesWithCars
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 05:54, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/21 David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org:
The project is starting with work flow focused goals.
1. Create a team.
2. Create a release cycle.
3. Start cranking out releases each one better than the last.
The missing gap
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 02:49:41PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
In some of the other threads we have been seeing an interest in the
Sugar Labs Community improving the Sugar experience on the XO. As
such, I would like to create a XO SIG within Sugar Labs. I have filed
an initial draft
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Martin Dengler
mar...@martindengler.com wrote:
Seems completely redundant with F11-on-XO and SoaS-on-XO (not to
mention debxo and probably others). I don't see how this is going to
do anything but cause fragmentation and confusion.
Maybe it is just a new name
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/21 David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org:
My idea is to start by getting a working version of the current
versions of Sugar and Fedora running on an XO. The SIG might lose
some of the specific hardware benefits and
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
The goal is to provide a place where the various people working
But there _are_ people working on this already, and they probably have
plans, priorities, etc.
Why don't we just let them do their thing? Are they asking
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 7:48 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
For the past several months the OLPC/Sugar Labs ecosystem has been
getting requests to provide releases of more recent versions of
2009/9/21 David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org:
The project is starting with work flow focused goals.
1. Create a team.
2. Create a release cycle.
3. Start cranking out releases each one better than the last.
The missing gap in the current Sugar- distro- XO workflow is that
CJB is working
2009/9/22 David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org:
Because of time restrictions, the F11 on XO effort seems to be
reactive. They take the output from cjb and the fedora packages and
create builds.
Is this a criticism? Are you proposing changing this?
I believe that the XO SIG could help
In some of the other threads we have been seeing an interest in the
Sugar Labs Community improving the Sugar experience on the XO. As
such, I would like to create a XO SIG within Sugar Labs. I have filed
an initial draft application with the OLPC Contributors program for 5
loaner machines for
To: iaep
Subject: [IAEP] XO Special interest group at Sugar Labs
In some of the other threads we have been seeing an interest in the
Sugar Labs Community improving the Sugar experience on the XO. As
such, I would like to create a XO SIG within Sugar Labs. I have filed
an initial draft
2009/9/21 David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org:
My idea is to start by getting a working version of the current
versions of Sugar and Fedora running on an XO. The SIG might lose
some of the specific hardware benefits and mass deployment features on
the first couple of iterations. But, it can
12 matches
Mail list logo
