On Sep 8, 2017 7:43 AM, "Laura Vargas" wrote:
2017-08-14 23:51 GMT-05:00 Adam Holt :
> Thanks Karen for please responding to these 3 emails I sent you when
> possible:
> ...
>
> - Aug 9 subject line "Samson Goddy asks for visa supporting docs for GSoC
>
2017-08-14 23:51 GMT-05:00 Adam Holt :
> Thanks Karen for please responding to these 3 emails I sent you when
> possible:
> ...
> - Aug 9 subject line "Samson Goddy asks for visa supporting docs for GSoC
> visit to USA" [so that his visa is less likely to be denied, as happened
>
Thanks Karen for please responding to these 3 emails I sent you when
possible:
- July 12 subject line "Donation from Facebook" [paperwork required so
donations can flow to Sugar Labs]
- Aug 4 subject line "Donation from Facebook" [paperwork required so
donations can flow to Sugar Labs]
- Aug 9
g; OLPC para usuarios, docentes, ,
voluntarios y administradores; Hilary Naylor; SLOBs
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] URGENT action needed
The policy does not apply when the funding comes from an organisation
external to SFC.
Thanks to OLPC-SF and Hilary!
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 03:00:54PM -0500,
voluntarios y administradores" <[8]olpc-...@lists.laptop.org>,
> SLOBs
> <[9]sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org>, Tabitha Roder <[10]
> tabi...@tabitha.net.nz>
> Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] URGENT action needed
>
> Because Samso
gar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org>, "OLPC para usuarios, docentes,
> voluntarios y administradores" <olpc-...@lists.laptop.org>, SLOBs
> <sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org>, Tabitha Roder <tabi...@tabitha.net.nz
> >
> Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] URGENT ac
t;, "OLPC para usuarios, docentes,
voluntarios y administradores" <olpc-...@lists.laptop.org>, SLOBs
<sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org>, Tabitha Roder <tabi...@tabitha.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] URGENT action needed
Because Samson Goddy is our close fr
I'm also very disappointed.
I don't see a conflict of interest because of friendship; a board can
always pay members of the board for costs if they choose, even by an
advance if necessary. If friendship created a conflict of interest,
board members could never be friends.
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017
I am want to say that i am *very very* disappointed of what this community
is turning into. I am certainly confuse of how some decisions are been made
for reasons that are not just worth it.
I remember asking for $2K+ as to support i and Ibiam's travel to the
scratch conference that would
2017-08-13 8:44 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender :
> Really???
>
> I have to agree with Samson here. What is the existential risk here? How
> does the risk of a travel advance to a well established community member
> (and oversight board member) for a trip sponsored by a reliable
Really???
I have to agree with Samson here. What is the existential risk here? How
does the risk of a travel advance to a well established community member
(and oversight board member) for a trip sponsored by a reliable funding
source with whom we have been working for years represent some
Thank you Adam for the wonderful reply.
On Aug 13, 2017 2:10 PM, "Adam Holt" wrote:
Because Samson Goddy is our close friend and clearly should go to San
Francisco for GSoC, it is tempting to send him a personal loan.
But for Sugar Labs to provide loans to our personal friends
Because Samson Goddy is our close friend and clearly should go to San
Francisco for GSoC, it is tempting to send him a personal loan.
But for Sugar Labs to provide loans to our personal friends is a dangerous
precedent frought with moral and ethical hazards.
As such, personally my conscience
Because Adam is our Financial contact, I would like to hear from him before
voting.
In the meantime my vote could be considering as "Abstain".
Lionel.
2017-08-12 15:27 GMT-07:00 Tabitha Roder :
> I think Sugar Labs should approve the $US 627.05 travel
14 matches
Mail list logo