On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Luke Faraone l...@laptop.org wrote:
Maybe [DP-1] or [SDP-1]?
Yeah...Probably, that would be the best if we distinguish ourselves
from any future groups:)
Well, DP-1 and so are great.+1...how about DP-09 or DP-09-1???
-Abhishek
--
Abhishek Indoria
OLPC
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi all,
In Friday's SLOBs meeting, we approved the creation of a decision
panel, with the following people eligible to join the panel:
Can I take it that SLOB is not formally requesting a two week deadline
to report back as
Bill Bogstad wrote:
[...]
We will conduct any public discussions in the
s...@lists.sugarlabs.org mailing list with a subject line tagged with
[DP].
[...]
Suggestion: As a favor to the mailing list archive searcher of the
future, consider a tag [in addition to,instead of] DP. The DP
process
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 14:05, Sean McGrath s...@manybits.net wrote:
Bill Bogstad wrote:
We will conduct any public discussions in the
s...@lists.sugarlabs.org mailing list with a subject line tagged with
[DP].
Suggestion: As a favor to the mailing list archive searcher of the future,
