I think the Team structure is serving us well and Fred Grose has been
adding/updating the tags. Enabling better search by eliminating
CamelCase is probably the most important single action we could have
taken.
I agree that the team structure is great. The question is, subpages,
namespaces,
We really should fix this... either directly in the Journal or in an
unzip activity.
-walter
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 18.03.2009, at 13:43, Ro wrote:
Hi! Thank you for all your suggestions. I also visit this pages and a read a
lot of,
Would anyone like to re-visit the activity categories on aslo at
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/ .
Carol recently pointed out that documents should become reading
writing? words? Needs to encompass word games,
reading, writing... in http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/448 .
I believe
I had trouble getting the category list to transclude; have you tested that
idea, can you share the syntax.
Thanks, --Fred
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Jameson Quinn jameson.qu...@gmail.comwrote:
I think the Team structure is serving us well and Fred Grose has been
many thanks!
2009/3/18 Frederick Grose fgr...@gmail.com:
Whenever moving pages in the wiki, please remember to check this link,
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Special:DoubleRedirects, for double
redirects. If there are any, you can examine and edit the redirects to fix
them there.
Double
Marten, there's no problem for me if you want to put stickers on
sticks, just please be sure to use the official Sugar Labs logo
(http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Logo). Right now we prefer Sugar Labs
instead of Sugar as the former googles us much better than the
latter. Sugar Labs is a trademarked
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't know what the solution is, but I have issues with the above
taxonomy.
Is art music? Is music art? Where does synth lab fit it? Art, music,
programming, science? Is a memorize a game when you are making math
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 19:07, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me (I could be wrong) that the Mozilla add-ons can appear
in multiple categories.
Some systems build the categories dynamically from tags, of course the
key with that is to limit the tag vocabulary.
OSX widgets
The offered categories are not a taxonomy but rather a set of tags.
Presumably activities would be tagged with multiple of these if
appropriate. Have you ever looked at the amo site to see how the Firefox
add-ons appear there? You can see add-ons under multiple of the
descriptions they provide.
On 18 Mar 2009, at 17:47, Walter Bender wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Gary C Martin
g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
[snip]
So, summing up so far, this could give us something like:
Art
Communication
Games
Geography
Literacy
Maths
Music
Peace... I wasn't trying to derail the use of categories; just trying
to go further if and when we can. The evidence of the web suggests
that search will trump categories in the end, but we can get quite far
with pretty much any taxonomy at this scale.
-walter
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM,
Hi...
Many institutions categroize Fine Arts into 2 or more groups such as:
Visual Arts...painting, sculpture, graphics, etc.
Performing Arts...Music, Dance, Drama, etc.
Things like Turtle Art and Etoys would fall into the Visual Arts category. The
TamTam suite would, of course, be
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi...
Many institutions categroize Fine Arts into 2 or more groups such as:
Visual Arts...painting, sculpture, graphics, etc.
Performing Arts...Music, Dance, Drama, etc.
Things like Turtle Art and Etoys would fall
Sugar Labs has been accepted into Google Summer of Code
2009http://socghop.appspot.com/org/show/google/gsoc2009/sugarlabs.
Yay! Now we have work to do. Remember: the more students apply to our
program, the better our chances of getting more actual slots assigned, so
both publicity and making a
Great news!
just a little detail, http://sugarlabs.org; is deprecated, we are
communicating
www.sugarlabs.org in marketing materials or
http://www.sugarlabs.org; in webforms profiles etc. instead
thanks
Sean
2009/3/18 Jameson Quinn jameson.qu...@gmail.com:
Sugar Labs has been accepted into
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
Great news!
just a little detail, http://sugarlabs.org; is deprecated
Some http://no-www.org/ might disagree. :)
--
Luke Faraone
http://luke.faraone.cc
___
IAEP -- It's An
That's a great link, i didn't realize non-wwwers were so organized ;-)
I'm a great champion of being concise, until confusion results.
Unfortunately, many of our visitors will be less web-savvy than we
are.
Think of www. as a synonym for http://;, it makes for clearer
communication and is easily
I have spent time playing w/ opencroquet but not seaside. They are both
great projects but are very academically focused (sorry bertf!) and have
tiny communities.
I think a GSoC project focusing on creating an AJAX sugar app is a great
way to go forward. Getting it to work w/ a popular IDE is a
croquet and seaside do great, powerful stuff.
the thing is, much more than powerful activities we need developers to
be able to quickly make simple activities. Kids don't need 3d VR for
learning.
Simple multimedia activities for grammar, basic math, geography, health,
etc. w/ a very low barrier
19 matches
Mail list logo
