On 22 April 2011 16:41, Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.org wrote:
As per the new http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Finance I'm asking for Sugar
Labs to sponsor my airfare to Montevideo
Sugar Summit EduJAM http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Uruguay_Summit_2011.
For the olpc San Francisco bay
Hi Ian,
Certainly, my goal is to make it customizable as far as possible. I plan to
provide the admin with the possibility to adjust the databases, in order to
adapt the content to the local context (e.g. diseases like obesity or
diabetes). For now I am thinking of three different databases:
Hi Walter,
That’s an interesting point. At the beginning I also had something more like
an experimental cook studio in mind. During my research I found some funny
things, like making an own pH indicator with red cabbage, a natural pH
indicator that changes colors according to the acidity of the
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Aleksey Lim
alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 08:45:05PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Walter Bender wrote:
Log's at http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/2011-04-21#i_2660201
The links are in the wiki now
Hi Stefanie:
In Peru and prehistoric organic foods are little known, even in our country.
Knowing the value of these foods is valuable to a society dominated transgenic
crops.
Japanese mascot'm remembering those that fed them. That's the idea of avatar
.
A wonderful project for our children to
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
The oversight board is considering a motion to upgrade the license of
Sugar from GPLv2 or later to GPLv3 or later. Before proceeding to a
vote, we'd like to request feedback from the community.
Interesting. (Bad
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Authors can express their intentions through a license. If you didn't
want your code to be redistributed under a later versions of the GPL,
then why didn't you distribute as GPLv2-only?
On a personal note here...
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
- What's the upside?
- At what point do we say hey, this has scant upside, and negative
controversy around it, let's spend our time in productive things
instead?
This is the crux of my objection as well. I
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 18:47 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
Q: Do we need to ask the permission of all copyright holders?
A: No, we'll
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:45 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
We're not retroactively re-licensing existing code.
Really? By moving to GPLv3 your removing the ability to use GPLv2
which is by definition a re-license of the code.
Not really, this is a common misconception: redistributing code
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:45 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
We're not retroactively re-licensing existing code.
Really? By moving to GPLv3 your removing the ability to use GPLv2
which is by definition a re-license
wow... one day I'll raise the money to go to said event wish you all
the best and please keep us updated
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Tabitha Roder tabi...@tabitha.net.nzwrote:
On 22 April 2011 16:41, Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.org wrote:
As per the new
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:54 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
Yes, you seem to be confused Bernie. You can redistribute under a
license however you like, usually without explicitly stating it. But
if you alter the source files or replace COPYING, you are *changing
the license*.
For the olpc San Francisco bay community summit last year Adam Holt
setup a way for people to make donations to cover DSD's flights; I
think Adam used Paypal.
Can we do something similar to help get Sebastian to EduJAM?
I see no reason why not - trying to figure out how this
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:54 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org
wrote:
Yes, you seem to be confused Bernie. You can redistribute under a
license however you like, usually without explicitly stating it.
Disclaimer: given where I work now, advocating in favor of the GPL will
probably makes me look partisan, but long-time friends like you should
known that these have been my personal opinions for a long time.
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 10:50 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:00
Hi Bernie,
On Fri, Apr 22 2011, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
You've expressed some valid concerns and I believe I've responded
satisfactorily to all of them. If not, I'm glad to hear a
counter-argument from you.
I think you've repeatedly ignored Scott's claim that you can't modify
COPYING or the
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 22 2011, Chris Ball wrote:
I think you've repeatedly ignored Scott's claim that you can't modify
COPYING or the source files because that would be *changing* the
license, rather than taking advantage of GPLv3 redistribution rights.
Can you ask Brett or someone at the FSF what
Even though I haven't spoken with Bernie about his rationale for
proposing the upgrade of the license I would like to explain why I
strongly feel that as a member of the SLOBs board and as a
representative of the community I have the duty to back the proposal.
You see GPL is not only a
19 matches
Mail list logo
