[IAEP] Sugar Labs Wiki Gardening Event reminder

We will be meeting this weekend (14-15 May 2016) to do a major cleanup of the Sugar Labs wiki (wiki.sugarlabs.org). Feel free to join us in person (MIT W31-302) [1] or on line in the #sugar-meeting IRC channel on freenode.net. We'll begin at 10AM ET (14UTC) [2]. regards. -walter [1]

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-05-13 2:16 GMT+08:00 Chris Leonard : > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Sebastian Silva > wrote: > > El 12/05/16 a las 10:33, Chris Leonard escribió: > >> I would note that, as requested, Edgar provided a brief write-up of > >> the event

Re: [IAEP] SL member list/joining criterion

Hi Adam On 12 May 2016 at 15:33, Adam Holt wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> 1. A section of the doc is available live here, >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List >> >> 2. That doc shows 279 members

Re: [IAEP] SL member list/joining criterion

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > Hi > > 1. A section of the doc is available live here, > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List > > 2. That doc shows 279 members > > I've requested access to the doc :) Thanks Samson! > I'm NOT questioning

Re: [IAEP] SL member list/joining criterion

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:00 PM, samson goddy wrote: > > Hello Adam, here is the list you ask for. You can ask sebastian about the > election list. > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1bgJ6Z8gHpxIwpNSD8qf8B5n1ZQRA1r0AAdCDcMVeZEs/edit?usp=sharing_eid > this list

Re: [IAEP] SL member list/joining criterion

Hi 1. A section of the doc is available live here, http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List 2. That doc shows 279 members I've requested access to the doc :) Thanks Samson! Cheers Dave ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop

Re: [IAEP] SL member list/joining criterion

Hello Adam, here is the list you ask for. You can ask sebastian about the election list. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1bgJ6Z8gHpxIwpNSD8qf8B5n1ZQRA1r0AAdCDcMVeZEs/edit?usp=sharing_eid this list contain the names and email addresses of all sugarlabs member. But i don't know who is

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

I meant to type "Issues of language are best left to the members of language communities to resolve amongst themselves." cjl On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Chris Leonard wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Sebastian Silva > wrote:

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > El 12/05/16 a las 10:33, Chris Leonard escribió: >> I would note that, as requested, Edgar provided a brief write-up of >> the event afterwards (in Spanish), > > Great! > > Please note that one of the speakers

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

El 12/05/16 a las 10:33, Chris Leonard escribió: > I would note that, as requested, Edgar provided a brief write-up of > the event afterwards (in Spanish), Great! Please note that one of the speakers (Roger Gonzalo) is the person that was hired by the Ministry of Education to polish Edgar's

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

Hi! On 12 May 2016 at 11:33, Chris Leonard wrote: > I would note that, as requested, Edgar provided a brief write-up of > the event afterwards (in Spanish), which I have > Google-assisted-translated and will be posting (in both Spanish and > English) on the blog that

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 12 May 2016 at 11:09, Sean DALY wrote: >> >> Sam - I'm not aware that anyone here is other than "us volunteers". > > > Well, there's now a paid Translatoins Manager Yes there is and I am

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

On 12 May 2016 at 11:09, Sean DALY wrote: > Sam - I'm not aware that anyone here is other than "us volunteers". > Well, there's now a paid Translatoins Manager ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

I would note that, as requested, Edgar provided a brief write-up of the event afterwards (in Spanish), which I have Google-assisted-translated and will be posting (in both Spanish and English) on the blog that I'm setting up for reporting on Translation Community Manager activities. Asking funded

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Sam Parkinson wrote: > Us volunteers write code, make releases, do user testing, etc. Sam - I'm not aware that anyone here is other than "us volunteers". Dues are how many if not most normally functioning nonprofits operate. I am

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Hi On 12 May 2016 at 10:51, Caryl Bigenho wrote: > Dues are a bad idea! > Sorry folks > Please could you explain why you think this? -- Cheers Dave ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] GSoC mentor stipend motion

Hi On 12 May 2016 at 09:42, Walter Bender wrote: > As Adam has pointed out, this motion has failed to pass. It seems that > there is some support of the idea of offering at least a portion of the > GSoC stipend to mentors who need/request the funds, but the form of the

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Dues are a bad idea! Sorry folks Caryl Sent from my iPhone > On May 12, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > > >> On 11 May 2016 at 22:28, Sam Parkinson wrote: >> Is a membership fee for volunteers even something that any other Free >> Software

Re: [IAEP] Fwd: [SLOB] GPLv3 motion

On 12 May 2016 at 09:19, Walter Bender wrote: > the motion has passed. Thanks Walter! ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

On 11 May 2016 at 22:28, Sam Parkinson wrote: > Is a membership fee for volunteers even something that any other Free > Software orgs do? GNOME doesn't seem to. > Its very common for clubs/nonprofits to do this. FSF, Conservancy, TUG, UKTUG run membership programs,

[IAEP] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

I realize that we never actually had a formal motion for this as we got side-tracked by the i18n manager discussion (See [1]). Background: Edgar Quispe had requested funds to attend the Traducción e interpretación en las lenguas originarias del Perú meeting in Lima. The total cost of the trip was

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] GSoC mentor stipend motion

As Adam has pointed out, this motion has failed to pass. It seems that there is some support of the idea of offering at least a portion of the GSoC stipend to mentors who need/request the funds, but the form of the current motion, putting the authority into the hands of the mentors themselves does

[IAEP] Fwd: [SLOB] GPLv3 motion

My sincerest apologies. I realize I forgot to CC the lists on this email. So far we have approval for the motion from: Walter, Sameer, Claudia, José MIguel, Tony, and Lionel. Still waiting to hear back from Adam, but as you can see, the motion has passed. regards. -walter -- Forwarded

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

+ 1 to Sam P. Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:28:23 +1000 From: sam.parkins...@gmail.com To: la...@somosazucar.org CC: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org; olpc-...@lists.laptop.org; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; d...@lab6.com Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

I'm not a big fan of this idea. The SLOBs already seem to have some capital. But they seem to be scared to spend it. How much arguing have we done over the translation co-ordinator position? Something like a translation position would be great, but nobody has seemed to actually do anything