Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
On 19 June 2016 at 13:20, Tony Anderson wrote: > Unfortunately, this is not my vision of Sugar Labs or Sugar. I see Sugar > as an educational opportunity provided to users of the OLPC XO > and others. Naturally, it takes software engineers to develop and maintain > this

Re: [IAEP] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
On 19 June 2016 at 13:50, Sean DALY wrote: > If the subject is Pending Motion 2016-33, I am opposed to it for the > previously stated reasons. That motion failed 9 days ago, since email voting is only open for 7 days. Sorry I hadn't updated the

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Claudia! On 19 June 2016 at 13:38, Claudia Urrea wrote: > > I think we need someone to admin the motions. We have too many (pass, > pending votes and pending endorsement for vote, etc.), they become depend > on each other and we get stuck not being able to move forward.

Re: [IAEP] Motions A and B

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Caryl! Sorry to hear about the Montana trouble :( Perhaps you can 'hotspot' your phone to get online with wifi and a real keyboard before then :) On June 7 I made extensive suggestions to the document to address the objection that Adam raised at the last SLOB monthly meeting. I hope you'll be

Re: [IAEP] 172 XO-1s for $24 each (+ freight) $4,000 total

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
On 16 June 2016 at 09:00, Dave Crossland wrote: > Do we want these or not? :) > I guess not! ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

[IAEP] Motions A and B

2016-06-19 Thread Caryl Bigenho
Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Caryl Bigenho > Date: June 19, 2016 at 5:33:52 PM MDT > To: IAEP , sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org, > walter.ben...@gmail.com, Adam Holt , > tony_ander...@usa.net, Lionel Laske

Re: [IAEP] [Sur] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-06-19 Thread Sean DALY
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions This page is very useful. On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Claudia Urrea wrote: > Dave and all, > > I think we need someone to admin the motions. We have too many (pass, > pending votes and pending endorsement for

Re: [IAEP] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-19 Thread Sean DALY
If the subject is Pending Motion 2016-33, I am opposed to it for the previously stated reasons. The key activity of SL is developing software designed to help children learn, not providing a friendly environment to learn programming of software for children. Sean. On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:06

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-19 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, Laura Unfortunately, this is not my vision of Sugar Labs or Sugar. I see Sugar as an educational opportunity provided to users of the OLPC XO and others. Naturally, it takes software engineers to develop and maintain this software, but the vision must be about the result - Sugar and the

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
On 4 June 2016 at 00:07, Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 3 June 2016 at 14:38, Adam Holt wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: >> >>> On 12 May 2016 at 07:59, Walter Bender wrote: >>> > Motion: to

Re: [IAEP] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of SLOB. On 3 June 2016 at 14:25, Laura Vargas wrote: > I hereby propose the motion to update current SL vision statement: > > "About Sugar Labs(R): Sugar Labs(R) is a volunteer-driven member

Re: [IAEP] Motion to adopt the 2016 vision for Sugar Labs

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of SLOB. On 3 June 2016 at 02:46, Laura Vargas wrote: > I propose to adopt the following statement as the vision statement: > > Sugar Labs is a global community where you can learn how to design, >

Re: [IAEP] Motion: New monthly SLOB meeting procedure

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of SLOB. On 4 June 2016 at 11:38, Sebastian Silva wrote: > If I was a SLOB I would support this motion. The passivity of the SLOBs is > disappointing. It is better to vote and fail, than to

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a member

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of SLOB. On 3 June 2016 at 23:42, Dave Crossland wrote: > > > On 3 June 2016 at 17:10, Walter Bender wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Dave Crossland

Re: [IAEP] Motion: to consider email votes on motions only valid if they are sent to both the SLOBs and IAEP mailing lists.

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of SLOB. On 7 June 2016 at 10:00, Dave Crossland wrote: > Motion: to consider email votes on motions only valid if they are sent > to both the SLOBs and IAEP mailing lists. > -- Cheers Dave