Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion for Social Media Manager

2017-02-17 Thread Samson Goddy
On 18 Feb 2017 1:23 a.m., "Tymon Radzik" wrote: Thanks, of course i know that $100 won't be enough for ads, because facebook charge around $5 a day (lowest rate). But the idea behind the 1k is to make sure that the necessary things are carried out more like some minor payments. Especially when yo

Re: [IAEP] IAEP Digest, Vol 107, Issue 15

2017-02-17 Thread Tony Anderson
Consider an potential adopter who wants to try out Sugar. As Caryl knows from Scale, an adopter wants to know: 1 - What are the capabilities of Sugar, what are its strengths, who is using it, are there success stories, testimonials from users? 2 - How is it supported? If I were to deploy it and

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion for Social Media Manager

2017-02-17 Thread Tymon Radzik
Thanks, of course i know that $100 won't be enough for ads, because facebook charge around $5 a day (lowest rate). But the idea behind the 1k is to make sure that the necessary things are carried out more like some minor payments. Especially when you are using expensive ads on platform like Twitter

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion for Social Media Manager

2017-02-17 Thread Samson Goddy
Thanks, of course i know that $100 won't be enough for ads, because facebook charge around $5 a day (lowest rate). But the idea behind the 1k is to make sure that the necessary things are carried out more like some minor payments. Especially when you are using expensive ads on platform like Twitter

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion for Social Media Manager

2017-02-17 Thread Tymon Radzik
I am not SLOBs member, however I'd like to share my opinion with you. I have to agree with Ignacio, I am completely against making proposed "Social Media Manager" function to be paid. First and foremost, because Sugar Labs is *volunteer-driven *project. The idea is that members work for free supp

Re: [IAEP] [SLOB] ping

2017-02-17 Thread Samson Goddy
I am cool with the idea of the Outreachy, i also believe if we can fund more than one project. Then we should do it. That's a +1 for me. Samson On 16 Feb 2017 3:21 a.m., "Walter Bender" wrote: Does anyone have anything to say regarding my Outreachy motion? regards. -walter -- Walter Bender

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion for Social Media Manager

2017-02-17 Thread Samson Goddy
On 17 Feb 2017 10:01 p.m., "Ignacio Rodríguez" wrote: I love the idea except the part where someone get paid. Nobody like the idea of getting paid, but that how it is. We really need to focus on Social Media as described on the document, but we also need interesting content to share with peop

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion for Social Media Manager

2017-02-17 Thread Ignacio Rodríguez
I love the idea except the part where someone get paid. We really need to focus on Social Media as described on the document, but we also need interesting content to share with people. What I mean, for much I like Sugar Labs I think we don't have enough content/news/current users.. > 1. Using mys