Hi Caryl,
Thanks for this complete and excellent job.
I'm agree with the last update of Walter.
@Tony, I think the new version is more general. We don't need to mention tools
in mission, we'll do it in objectives.
Thanks again for this work Caryl. I'm okay to second the motion.
Lionel
_
Hi, Caryl
In the January 2017 meeting, the SLOBS approved the following motion:
motion: "Sugar is a learning platform based on the constructionist
educational principles of Jean Piaget, Seymour Papert, Cynthia Solomon,
and Alan Kay. Sugar Labs is responsible to develop, distribute, and
suppor
2017-04-21 14:48 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender :
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Laura Vargas
> wrote:
>
>>
>> As I have come to understand I, Laura was ineligible to vote according to
>> the Conflict of Interest Policy of Conservancy.
>>
>> So, we had 6 eligible votes with the following results
Assent.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
> Through a community effort led by Caryl Bigenho, I am making a motion.
>
> Motion: Revise the Sugar Labs mission statement to "Sugar Labs is a
> volunteer-run project whose mission is to reach global learners and
> educators with a collectio
+1 from me.
On Apr 21, 2017 10:29 PM, "Walter Bender" wrote:
Through a community effort led by Caryl Bigenho, I am making a motion.
Motion: Revise the Sugar Labs mission statement to "Sugar Labs is a
volunteer-run project whose mission is to reach global learners and
educators with a collection
Through a community effort led by Caryl Bigenho, I am making a motion.
Motion: Revise the Sugar Labs mission statement to "Sugar Labs is a
volunteer-run project whose mission is to reach global learners and
educators with a collection of tools that enable them to explore, discover,
create, and ref
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Very nice, Walter! Let's just change the motion to reflect your version.
> Therefore,
> I propose that the following motion be considered at the April SLOB meeting:
>
>
> *
I abstain as I see real arguments on both sides, and apologize I am torn.
On Apr 21, 2017 3:49 PM, "Walter Bender" wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Laura Vargas
> wrote:
>
>>
>> As I have come to understand I, Laura was ineligible to vote according to
>> the Conflict of Interest Po
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
> As I have come to understand I, Laura was ineligible to vote according to
> the Conflict of Interest Policy of Conservancy.
>
> So, we had 6 eligible votes with the following results during the voting
> period by email:
>
> 3 votes on favor
As I have come to understand I, Laura was ineligible to vote according to
the Conflict of Interest Policy of Conservancy.
So, we had 6 eligible votes with the following results during the voting
period by email:
3 votes on favor (Ignacio, Samson and Lionel)
1 vote against (Walter)
no votes receiv
Very nice, Walter! Let's just change the motion to reflect your version.
Therefore, I propose that the following motion be considered at the April SLOB
meeting:
_
The 2017 Mission Statement for Sugar Lab
*A bit more succinct: *
*Sugar Labs is a volunteer-run project whose mission is to reach global
learners and educators with a collection of tools that enable them to
explore, discover, create, and reflect. Sugar Labs distributes these tools
freely and encourages its users to appropriate them, taki
Hello All,
This is long, but it needs to be done…
It’s time to “fish or cut bait” as they say. We need to move on with the
Mission Statement and Goals for Sugar Labs. I am submitting a Mission Statement
as a motion to be considered for approval at the April SLOB meeting. Then, with
that in h
14 matches
Mail list logo
