Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

Thanks, I'll review it. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:09:06PM -0500, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Hi James, > > I've found a moment to make Moon (JS) work in Sugar again. The version > in the original repo was only missing a small patch. > > https://github.com/zhirzh/sugarizer-activity-moon/pull/13 >

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] (Goals and Mission) with Microsoft in it?

Hi James, I've found a moment to make Moon (JS) work in Sugar again. The version in the original repo was only missing a small patch. https://github.com/zhirzh/sugarizer-activity-moon/pull/13 Hope you find it useful, Regards, Sebastian On 12/05/17 19:58, James Cameron wrote: > I'm probably

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

Hi Chris Currently there are two text fields per activity in ASLO: Summary and Description. This gets a bit more complicated since these text fields edited by the developer in github. Perhaps this might work. Have a po directory in the activities/ directory of the bundle. When the activity

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Sugarizer - I18n/L10n query

I will look at it. Have been using webL10n.js which, via a simple script can leverage the power files. On May 18, 2017 11:21 PM, "Chris Leonard" wrote: > Have any of our Javasript / Sugarizer folks played around with > xgettext-js yet? > >

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

I mis-phrased that slightly. ASLO would parse the PO files for the lines drawn from the activity,info file during POT generation (i18n), not parse the activity.info file itself (which I think ASLO already does for versuion number, etc.). The idea is that the activity,info description in

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Tony Anderson wrote: > On 05/19/2017 09:24 AM, Chris Leonard wrote: >> > The more difficult question is how to localize the summary and description > of the individual activities. At present, it appears we don't attempt to > localize this

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

Dear Jatin, Welcome to the Sugar Labs community, When reworking ASLO (a very valuable project), please do keep internationalization (i18n) and localization (L10n) in mind. You may or may not know that we do host PO files for L10n of NewASLO on our Pootle translation server:

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

s/These are my notes/These are some notes/g :) Walter Bender has helped me to shape this first proposal. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Samuel Cantero wrote: > Hi all, > > These are my notes in order to augment current proposal: https://goo.gl/ > VEIzCr > > You can add

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

Hi all, These are my notes in order to augment current proposal: https://goo.gl/VEIzCr You can add comments/suggestions to the document. Best regards, Sam C. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Jatin Dhankhar wrote: > Hi, > Thank you Laura for attaching the proposal.

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

Hi, Thank you Laura for attaching the proposal. I will be glad if you can point me in the right direction regarding my GSOC project, suggest flaws and how it can be improved. If anyone has any questions or speculations, feel free to ping me. I am also writing weekly summary of GSOC here