Re: [IAEP] Paint and Transparent Backgrounds

2009-10-05 Thread Albert Cahalan
Tim McNamara writes: 2009/10/5 Caroline Meeks caroline at solutiongrove.com Could we set Paint to have a transparent background on images as a default rather then white? That would make it easier to layer different drawings and have them interact. Is that difficult programatically? Can

Re: [IAEP] Which Language?

2009-09-27 Thread Albert Cahalan
Benjamin M. Schwartz writes: There are other options, such as HTML+Javascript, Squeak, and C/C++, but they each suffer from some combination of reduced functionality, problematic cross-platform guarantees, and increased difficulty of programming. Let's not ignore Python, which suffers

Re: [IAEP] OOO4kids running

2009-09-14 Thread Albert Cahalan
s.boutayeb at free.fr writes: OpenOffice for Kids (OOO4Kids) is available ... http://olpc-france.org/wiki/index.php?title=Image:Ooo4kids2.png On the subject of adapting software for kids... Good: eliminating or enlarging fiddly things that are hard to control with the mouse (ESPECIALLY WHEN

Re: [IAEP] getsatisfaction.com

2009-08-22 Thread Albert Cahalan
Re: [IAEP] getsatisfaction.com dfarn...@sugarlabs.org David Farning writes: I just wanted to thank everyone who is helping out at http://getsatisfaction.com/sugarlabs . Some URL there! All I can think of is this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjgeXTF0WNQ BTW, this works nicely, even on

Re: [IAEP] New activity: Arithmetic.

2009-08-12 Thread Albert Cahalan
First of all, it's wonderful to finally see this activity. Plenty of words in the UI are not easy, starting with difficulty. :-) There doesn't seem to be any scratch space to work in, but I'm just looking at the screen shot. Can the user lay out a long division in the standard form? Can the user

Re: [IAEP] The Children's Library On OLPC project

2009-07-25 Thread Albert Cahalan
Jim Simmons writes: A Journal entry consists of a file plus metadata. There is no real advantage in NOT storing the book in the Journal. You can convert whatever book format you're reading into a zipped archive of same on reading it for the first time then mark the Journal entry with Read's

Re: [IAEP] Journal criticism

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Cahalan
Tomeu Vizoso writes: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 20:20, Lucian Branescu lucian.branescu at gmail.com wrote: I'm new to Sugar, so I may be horribly wrong. But to me, the Journal seems more of an annoyance than anything else. A lot of the work I see done is towards bringing back some of the

Re: [IAEP] Journal criticism

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Cahalan
Tomeu Vizoso writes: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 04:54, forster at ozonline.com.au wrote: I am happy to expand this to the list. I have raised the journal once or twice before but mainly kept quiet not wanting to be trollish. ... The journal and sharing are probably the two central things that

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] journal criticism

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Cahalan
James Zaki writes: Understanding hierarchical file structures use the concepts of containers and recursion with no limits (except for total capacity). It is not naturally intuitive, like a tree where branches get smaller from the trunk with fruit/leaves only at the end nodes. Empirically

Re: [IAEP] Journal criticism

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Cahalan
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 04:58:17AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: Tomeu Vizoso writes: I think it's very important if we want to keep pushing Sugar that we distinguish between design decisions and bugs and unimplemented

Re: [IAEP] F.Y.I.: this month's cover story for CACM is OLPC: Vision vs. Reality (cross posted)

2009-05-20 Thread Albert Cahalan
Expensive journals are obsolete. http://pcic.merage.uci.edu/papers/2008/OneLaptop.pdf ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] versus, not

2009-05-07 Thread Albert Cahalan
Kathy Pusztavari writes: Caroline Meeks writes: 3. Improved authoring tools and other automation tools might reduce the level of effort required to create this content. *Yes, this will be key. I really liked some of the ideas that Albert Cahalan put forth - even if I didn't fully

Re: [IAEP] versus, not

2009-05-07 Thread Albert Cahalan
Maria Droujkova writes: I think it may be useful to distinguish tracks, and destinations to which they lead. The real deal destinations are to make mathematics: coin definitions and refine them, pose problems, form conjectures, construct example spaces, create models and so on. Activities

Re: [IAEP] educational brew

2009-05-05 Thread Albert Cahalan
Costello, Rob R writes: most teachers that i know want to know that any 'innovation' 'addresses the curriculum' ... but this won't overturn the inertia in traditional curriculum content To a teacher, is curriculum the raw state/national standard or is it instead the content of the particular

Re: [IAEP] The User experience/interface for Printing

2009-05-04 Thread Albert Cahalan
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Andrés Ambrois andresambr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday 03 May 2009 06:29:26 pm Albert Cahalan wrote: Vamsi Krishna Davuluri writes: The priority is on sending the docs to cups-pdf for conversion and then talking to Moodle for teacher review. It is a good idea

Re: [IAEP] The User experience/interface for Printing

2009-05-03 Thread Albert Cahalan
Vamsi Krishna Davuluri writes: So, talking to Tomeu, we agreed that for Write and Read using the gtkprint would be best as both support it as a printing API. The focus on Write and Read is short sighted and may lead to inflexible solutions. Now, the current plan is: 1) We do journal

Re: [IAEP] Books Books Books

2009-04-29 Thread Albert Cahalan
Edward Cherlin writes: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Caroline Meeks solutiongrove at gmail.com wrote: There are supposed to be a Bible and a Qur'an for the XO. I know where the texts are for a dozen other religions, if anybody is interested in providing them. Sugar is not restricted to

Re: [IAEP] Books Books Books

2009-04-29 Thread Albert Cahalan
Costello, Rob R writes: So refreshing to have Albert trolling again - waiting for us to rise to the bait If you really believe I'm trolling, why did you give me a win? Unfortunately for me, I had other reasons to post that email. I'm annoyed at the double standards here. If it looks like I'm

[IAEP] 3D engine uses in a no-nonsense GUI (was: XO Gen 1.5)

2009-04-21 Thread Albert Cahalan
Christoph Derndorfer writes: I honestly can't think of a use-case for including any sort of 3D acceleration into the basic Sugar and activities. There's about a million significantly more important things that people should be working on before even thinking about 3D (IMHO). One can use a 3D

Re: [IAEP] First competitor?

2009-02-28 Thread Albert Cahalan
Christian Marc Schmidt writes: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Caroline Meeks solutiongrove at gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Christian Marc Schmidt christianmarc at gmail.com wrote: I think we'd need to know the specific points of contention. I can't imagine which

Re: [IAEP] Adults and Sugar

2009-02-28 Thread Albert Cahalan
Caryl Bigenho writes: One man sat in front of the XO for several minutes with a puzzled look on his face. Finally he asked, Where is your file manager? I explained that he needed to forget everything he knew about computers and just pretend he was a child again. He got up in disgust and

Re: [IAEP] Userful Linux ThinNetworks to deploy 300, 000+ virtualized desktops in Brazil

2009-02-24 Thread Albert Cahalan
John Watlington writes: On Feb 19, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Tony Anderson wrote: Really sad. Buying one desktop and creating 'five' seats is probably cheaper than 5 or 6 XOs. Is it really ? I don't even see a real cost benefit. $450 - one low end desktop computer $350 - (5) $70 monitors $ 50

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Education on the XO

2009-01-04 Thread Albert Cahalan
David Van Assche writes: Actually there are a whole bunch of examples I uploaded to schools.sugarlabs.org, the problem we have is of how to categorise them. ie... do we put them via subject, via class, via country, via language? I can't see anything there. It keeps demanding an account. I

Re: [IAEP] squeak/etoys accepted as free software...

2008-11-09 Thread Albert Cahalan
Jecel Assumpcao Jr writes: Holger Levsen wrote: IIRC/IIUC this is one aspect why the ftpmasters didnt accept it in main. More generally said, (IIRC) it's because the impossibility to bootstrap etoys. Is the subject correct? I mean I know we are talking about a directory called non-free but

Re: [IAEP] Coloring books on the XO?

2008-09-26 Thread Albert Cahalan
C. Scott Ananian writes: On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Samuel Klein sj at laptop.org wrote: Coloring something certainly helps remember it. And changing the colors of shapes/objects in a drawing or scene or skin is one of the simple pleasures in life. A simple implementation of coloring

Re: [IAEP] Sad

2008-09-17 Thread Albert Cahalan
Microsoft probably deserves to win. :-( Problems can't get fixed unless you admit that they exist. This may require the loss of a few sacred cows. Responding to several people here... I fear it was not a joke to suggest that Sugar on MIPS would somehow be compelling. Let's not be totally out of

Re: [IAEP] Sad

2008-09-17 Thread Albert Cahalan
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 17.09.2008 um 10:19 schrieb Albert Cahalan: Within the Sugar community, certain activities are adored. They hold privileged positions, generally being installed be default despite not being of a utility (shell

Re: [IAEP] [Fwd: 0.84 goals]

2008-08-16 Thread Albert Cahalan
victor rajewski writes: On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Albert Cahalan acahalan at gmail.com wrote: You're using it exclusively, right...? (no bash, no MacOS, etc.) If it's not good enough for you, then it's definitely not good enough to be forced on other people. That would be like

Re: [IAEP] Concise explanation of Constructionism from the Learning Team

2008-08-15 Thread Albert Cahalan
Seth Woodworth writes: [Future of Learning Group] We are developing Constructionism as a theory of learning and education. Constructionism is based on two different senses of construction. It is grounded in the idea that people learn by actively constructing new knowledge, rather than having