Lionel,
I confess that I find this "do you really need me there?" style of
thinking rather unfortunate, and personally believe that any SLOB member
should feel obligated to attend the monthly meetings, unless something
specific is preventing you from doing so. It was a clear obligation when
y
Has anyone put together the equivalent of
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2015-2016-candidates for this
year? Are there any candidate statements published in the wiki?
regards.
-walter
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Not sure what you are trying to say. Even
Hi Caryl!
On 12 May 2016 at 11:08, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 12 May 2016 at 10:51, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
>
>> Dues are a bad idea!
>> Sorry folks
>>
>
> Please could you explain why you think this?
>
I'm keen to understand your concern :)
--
Cheers
Dave
___
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 12 May 2016 at 11:09, Sean DALY wrote:
>>
>> Sam - I'm not aware that anyone here is other than "us volunteers".
>
>
> Well, there's now a paid Translatoins Manager
Yes there is and I am sympathetic to those who find their wish to
v
On 12 May 2016 at 11:09, Sean DALY wrote:
> Sam - I'm not aware that anyone here is other than "us volunteers".
>
Well, there's now a paid Translatoins Manager
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Sam Parkinson
wrote:
> Us volunteers write code, make releases, do user testing, etc.
Sam - I'm not aware that anyone here is other than "us volunteers".
Dues are how many if not most normally functioning nonprofits operate. I am
co-founder and treasurer of a s
Hi
On 12 May 2016 at 10:51, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Dues are a bad idea!
> Sorry folks
>
Please could you explain why you think this?
--
Cheers
Dave
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.s
Dues are a bad idea!
Sorry folks
Caryl
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 12, 2016, at 7:17 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
>> On 11 May 2016 at 22:28, Sam Parkinson wrote:
>> Is a membership fee for volunteers even something that any other Free
>> Software orgs do? GNOME doesn't seem to.
>
>
> I
On 11 May 2016 at 22:28, Sam Parkinson wrote:
> Is a membership fee for volunteers even something that any other Free
> Software orgs do? GNOME doesn't seem to.
>
Its very common for clubs/nonprofits to do this. FSF, Conservancy, TUG,
UKTUG run membership programs, and I also pay member dues to
+ 1 to Sam P.
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:28:23 +1000
From: sam.parkins...@gmail.com
To: la...@somosazucar.org
CC: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org;
olpc-...@lists.laptop.org; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; d...@lab6.com
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting
I'm not a big fan of this idea.
The SLOBs already seem to have some capital. But they seem to be
scared to spend it. How much arguing have we done over the translation
co-ordinator position? Something like a translation position would be
great, but nobody has seemed to actually do anything
On 11 May 2016 at 15:35, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
>
> 2016-05-12 2:08 GMT+08:00 Dave Crossland :
>
>>
>> On 11 May 2016 at 14:05, Laura Vargas wrote:
>>
>>> there are ~US$65,000 available for planning/distributing among
>>> activities/teams/projects etc.
>>
>>
>> I think its essential that this be
2016-05-12 2:08 GMT+08:00 Dave Crossland :
>
> On 11 May 2016 at 14:05, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
>> there are ~US$65,000 available for planning/distributing among
>> activities/teams/projects etc.
>
>
> I think its essential that this be spent in ways that led directly to
> further income, to grow t
On 11 May 2016 at 14:05, Laura Vargas wrote:
> there are ~US$65,000 available for planning/distributing among
> activities/teams/projects etc.
I think its essential that this be spent in ways that led directly to
further income, to grow the project.
_
2016-05-12 2:03 GMT+08:00 Chris Leonard :
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> >
> > On 11 May 2016 at 13:03, Laura Vargas wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry I missed to explain this. By the date of the agreement (2012),
> the
> >> Project agreed that, on the Effective Date, $1,887.44
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 11 May 2016 at 13:03, Laura Vargas wrote:
>>
>> Sorry I missed to explain this. By the date of the agreement (2012), the
>> Project agreed that, on the Effective Date, $1,887.44 (10% of the existing
>> Project Fund on the Effective Da
On 11 May 2016 at 13:03, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Sorry I missed to explain this. By the date of the agreement (2012), the
> Project agreed that, on the Effective Date, $1,887.44 (10% of the existing
> Project Fund on the Effective Date), will be donated to Conservancy’s
> general fund additional t
2016-05-12 0:56 GMT+08:00 Dave Crossland :
>
>
> On 11 May 2016 at 12:50, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
>> You are totally right Adam, I'm sorry I did not notice these were
>> cumulative values. Corrected table would look like this:
>>
>>
>>
>> Total Income 10% of Total Income
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015 $9.028,56
On 11 May 2016 at 12:50, Laura Vargas wrote:
> You are totally right Adam, I'm sorry I did not notice these were
> cumulative values. Corrected table would look like this:
>
>
>
> Total Income 10% of Total Income
>
>
>
> 2015 $9.028,56 $902,86
> 2014 $49.622,18 $4.962,22
> 2013 $49.229,19 $4.922,
You are totally right Adam, I'm sorry I did not notice these were
cumulative values. Corrected table would look like this:
Total Income 10% of Total Income
2015 $9.028,56 $902,86
2014 $49.622,18 $4.962,22
2013 $49.229,19 $4.922,92
2012 $208,26 $1.908,27
*Total* *$108.088,19* *$12.696,26*
Al
On May 11, 2016 11:19 AM, "Laura Vargas" wrote:
>
> 2016-05-08 0:20 GMT+08:00 Adam Holt :
>>
>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Chris Leonard
wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chris Leonard
wrote:
>>> > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
>>> >
>>> > ...
>>> >
>>> >>
2016-05-08 0:20 GMT+08:00 Adam Holt :
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Chris Leonard
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chris Leonard
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
>> >
>> > ...
>> >
>> >> In other words that SL's effective payment to SFConservanc
1:25:42 +0100
CC: sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org;
sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; olpc-...@lists.laptop.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open
issues to discuss
Well, I won't go against lionel, but I have something to say. Is
Well, I won't go against lionel, but I have something to say. Is not as if
everyone wants to take money from SL but for the benefit for the SugarLabs. If
we keep using this mindset I don't we will be able to grow bigger as planned.
My project was for the betterment for both Nigeria and SL. Like
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Chris Leonard
wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chris Leonard
> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> In other words that SL's effective payment to SFConservancy (for
> >> legal/financial/administrative service)
On 7 May 2016 at 11:47, Chris Leonard wrote:
> > I'm looking for an executed copy of the current SugarLabs-SFC FSA to
> > confirm, unfortunately the wiki version looks at variance with the
> > template, but as a wiki page, it has no "official" status.
> >
> > https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_L
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chris Leonard wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> In other words that SL's effective payment to SFConservancy (for
>> legal/financial/administrative service) is equal to 10% of all expenditures
>> (outlays) each fiscal year, i.e
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
...
> In other words that SL's effective payment to SFConservancy (for
> legal/financial/administrative service) is equal to 10% of all expenditures
> (outlays) each fiscal year, i.e. March 1st to end of February.
>
> (But someone else can correc
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
>
> 2016-05-07 9:28 GMT+08:00 Adam Holt :
>
>> On May 6, 2016 5:45 PM, "Laura Vargas" wrote:
>> > the budget allowed for Chris Leonard's Internationalization tasks
>> (USD$12,000.00)
>>
>> On this narrow point, I'd (assume) Translation Commun
2016-05-07 9:28 GMT+08:00 Adam Holt :
> On May 6, 2016 5:45 PM, "Laura Vargas" wrote:
> > the budget allowed for Chris Leonard's Internationalization tasks
> (USD$12,000.00)
>
> On this narrow point, I'd (assume) Translation Community Manager outlay
> represents $12,000 + 10% for SFConservancy =
On May 6, 2016 5:45 PM, "Laura Vargas" wrote:
> the budget allowed for Chris Leonard's Internationalization tasks
(USD$12,000.00)
On this narrow point, I'd (assume) Translation Community Manager outlay
represents $12,000 + 10% for SFConservancy = $13,200 total, from May 1st
2016 to Apr 30 2017 an
2016-05-07 2:25 GMT+08:00 Adam Holt :
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Karen Sandler
> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-05-06 12:06, Adam Holt wrote:
>>
>> s/he tries to do that, SFConservancy has explained to me that they
>>> often take a month-or-so to get all receipts entered into their
>>> system, so th
il.com; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org;
> lio...@olpc-france.org; olpc-...@lists.laptop.org;
> sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org; t...@olenepal.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder
>
>
> Hi
>
> On 31 March 2016 at 04:02, Samson Godd
p.org; sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org;
t...@olenepal.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder
Hi
On 31 March 2016 at 04:02, Samson Goddy wrote:
I will suggest that the samson proposal should be taken first in the
meeting tomorrow. the meeting is 8
Hi
On 31 March 2016 at 04:02, Samson Goddy wrote:
> I will suggest that the samson proposal should be taken first in the
> meeting tomorrow. the meeting is 8pm by nigerian time and the cyber
> cafe i will using closes by 9pm. so i dont want to miss out.
>
On 1 April 2016 at 11:03, Laura Vargas
2016-03-31 8:20 GMT+08:00 Walter Bender :
> Here is the current agenda:
>
> Agenda:
> 1. Google Summer of Code status (Walter)
> 2. Wiki Cleanup Party planning (Walter)
> 3. Request from Edgar Quispe to attend Traducción e interpretación en las
> lenguas originarias del Perú meeting in Lima (Walte
On 30 March 2016 at 20:20, Walter Bender wrote:
> 7. Treasurer position and process (Adam and Caryl) See [1]
>
...
[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/16jIFuZ9bX
> -Bv675BpA1KmcEcRcX4PRCOUEX0ICRUkOc/edit
I read the doc and the structure of the policy seems good, but I would like
to suggest
On 30 March 2016 at 15:56, Lionel Laské wrote:
>
> As I said at last meeting, I would like to add a topic regarding "Sugar
> vision".
> Will share a document proposal.
>
I am very eager to see your draft!! :D
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not
On 30 March 2016 at 21:27, Adam Holt wrote:
> the above is just a proposal
I think this is a very wise proposal :)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
On Mar 30, 2016 8:20 PM, "Walter Bender" wrote:
>
> Here is the current agenda:
>
> Agenda:
> 1. Google Summer of Code status (Walter)
> 2. Wiki Cleanup Party planning (Walter)
> 3. Request from Edgar Quispe to attend Traducción e interpretación en las
lenguas originarias del Perú meeting in Lima
Here is the current agenda:
Agenda:
1. Google Summer of Code status (Walter)
2. Wiki Cleanup Party planning (Walter)
3. Request from Edgar Quispe to attend Traducción e interpretación en las
lenguas originarias del Perú meeting in Lima (Walter and CJL)
4. I18n manager discussion (Tony)
5. Proposal
During February's meeting I was assigned to report back during March's
meeting ideas on how to replace continuously inactive board members -- in a
respectful, consistent and most professional way -- to protect the vibrancy
of our legacy.
Then during March's meeting, time did not permit me to prese
42 matches
Mail list logo