On 19 June 2016 at 13:50, Sean DALY wrote:
> If the subject is Pending Motion 2016-33, I am opposed to it for the
> previously stated reasons.
That motion failed 9 days ago, since email voting is only open for 7 days.
Sorry I hadn't updated the
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Deci
If the subject is Pending Motion 2016-33, I am opposed to it for the
previously stated reasons. The key activity of SL is developing software
designed to help children learn, not providing a friendly environment to
learn programming of software for children.
Sean.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:06 PM
Hi
I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of
SLOB.
On 3 June 2016 at 14:25, Laura Vargas wrote:
> I hereby propose the motion to update current SL vision statement:
>
> "About Sugar Labs(R): Sugar Labs(R) is a volunteer-driven member project
> of Software Freedom
Thank you for posting this motion, Laura! :)
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep