On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:31:29PM -0700, Josh Williams wrote:
> Martin Dengler wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:42:32PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
> >
> >> Alas, if I had the technical chops to code what is necessary, I would
> >> have done so already :-(
> >>
> > [...]
> >
> >> Desig
Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:42:32PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
>
>> Alas, if I had the technical chops to code what is necessary, I would
>> have done so already :-(
>>
> [...]
>
>> Designing a slick, integrated site can come later as far as I'm
>> concerned (other pr
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:42:32PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
> Alas, if I had the technical chops to code what is necessary, I would
> have done so already :-(
[...]
> Designing a slick, integrated site can come later as far as I'm
> concerned (other priorities more important) but we could go to
> si
Alas, if I had the technical chops to code what is necessary, I would
have done so already :-(
the fundamental problem is that several parts of the SL "site" are
traps for unsophisticated users: they can get in, but they can't get
back out and can't get back to the homepage.
The absence of links
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:14:06PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
> Again, we need at least basically consistent navigation.
I'm surprised such a high (worth a month's delay before a volunteer
can work on designing a solution) bar was set for such a simple
(remove target="_blank"), obviously useful (work
Again, we need at least basically consistent navigation.
Christian told me earlier this week he would probably have time to
work on that this weekend.
We could advance more rapidly if no one is suprised when Christian
adapts my April 3rd suggestion:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/200
