Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Do you have any more specific objections? ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Progress. Further progress will come after I speak with Bradley Kuhn in coming weeks, to understand has real-world recommendations on pacing/publishing financials, based on his extensive experiences with the ~40 NGO's he (as SFConservancy's de facto bookkeeper) supervises/supports. I hope he has

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Hi I went over Caryl's google doc again after re-reading the below, and I must say that I am no longer surprised by Adam's comments at the SLOB meeting on Friday; it seems that these clearly expressed points were not addressed in the text that Caryl submitted. Adam, please review the Google Doc

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Karen Sandler wrote: > On 2016-05-06 12:06, Adam Holt wrote: > > s/he tries to do that, SFConservancy has explained to me that they >> often take a month-or-so to get all receipts entered into their >> system, so the Financial Manager

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Hi Adam Thanks for the thoughtful comments, I've added them as comments in the doc to help close them out On 6 May 2016 at 12:06, Adam Holt wrote: > The financial spring cleaning CarylB, DaveC and others have worked hard on > within >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

The financial spring cleaning CarylB, DaveC and others have worked hard on within https://docs.google.com/document/d/16jIFuZ9bX-Bv675BpA1KmcEcRcX4PRCOUEX0ICRUkOc/edit is promising, but seems premature in my opinion, until its mechanics are better understood: - Even if we suppose that $X remains

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Hi Caryl! Sorry to hear about that - best wishes for you and Ed that it all goes smoothly! :) On 5 May 2016 at 12:14, Caryl Bigenho wrote: > Hi all... > I finally had a chance to check out the discussions about the motions I > have proposed. Unfortunately I don't really

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Hi all... I finally had a chance to check out the discussions about the motions I have proposed. Unfortunately I don't really have the chance to do much commenting as I am restricted to communicating with my I phone for a while. After a great 10 days in WA and going to LinuxFestNW (on our own

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

On 3 May 2016 at 09:37, Caryl Bigenho wrote: > Why does the vision statement say "but not phones"? I run Sugarizer on my > iPhone and Ed's Android phone. There are some formatting issues but they > are easily overcome. In the real world of developing countries, children >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Why does the vision statement say "but not phones"? I run Sugarizer on my iPhone and Ed's Android phone. There are some formatting issues but they are easily overcome. In the real world of developing countries, children are probably more likely to have access to one of these tiny screens than

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Hi all, Would like to add a quick motion to ensure we share the Vision Proposal 2016 [1]. Not the goal part of the page, at first. Best regards from France. Lionel. [1] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Vision_proposal_2016 2016-04-29 16:29 GMT+02:00 Walter Bender