Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

7 May 2016 17:12:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [SLOBS] [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss To: lio...@olpc-france.org; cbige...@hotmail.com CC: sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; olpc-...@lists.laptop.org Hi On

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Hi On 7 May 2016 at 16:09, Lionel Laské wrote: > > 2016-05-07 22:06 GMT+02:00 Dave Crossland : > >> Do you think having the motion as it is with $Y = 0 is ok? >> > > Yep. > Okay good :) Caryl, is your intention for the motion to be drafted with $X and $Y

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Yep. 2016-05-07 22:06 GMT+02:00 Dave Crossland : > Do you think having the motion as it is with $Y = 0 is ok? > > ___ > SLOBs mailing list > sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs > >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Do you think having the motion as it is with $Y = 0 is ok? ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

Sorry to be once again the devil's advocate but I think SugarLabs has no resource to pay for a Financial Manager. We can't both support the cost of a SFC and the cost of a Financial Manager. I think the job done by SFC and nice reports by Adam and Laura (and others) are enough for a small