On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
We already have de...@lists.laptop.org for OLPC,
fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com and others for Fedora,
On 09/15/2009 10:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is:
== Further separation between upstream and downstreams ==
Without artificially privileging nor discriminating any downstream. So
a big +1 to giving a stronger identity to the SoaS
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
FWIW, as a (upstream) Sugar developer what I would like to see is:
== Further separation between upstream and downstreams ==
Without artificially
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
We already have de...@lists.laptop.org for OLPC,
fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com and others for Fedora,
debian-olpc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org for Debian,
ubuntu-sugart...@lists.ubuntu.com for Ubuntu. Why SoaS would be
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote:
+1 to pretty much your whole message.
I would like a little clarification though on the boundaries of SoaS.
My interpretation is as follows:
SoaS takes the XO 1-1 model and replaces the one machine per student
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote:
Short Term Action Items:
* We create a SoaS mailing list.
* We establish the SoaS development team.
if you split off sugar-dev, to reach the involved people you either
have to crosspost all the time, or get everyone
+1
I made a similar suggestion a couple of weeks back.
Thinking as someone who will probably be in it up to his neck, on the
teaching side, what I would like to see is a polished distribution,
installable on a hard disk, released once a year around April-May. That will
give me all summer to
