Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-05-02 Thread Chris Leonard
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > There is no narration to any of the videos. They are simply screencasts (of > Sugar running in English). > Sorry, I misunderstood the issue. I guess we would need a robotic method of walking through screen actions

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-05-02 Thread Walter Bender
There is no narration to any of the videos. They are simply screencasts (of Sugar running in English). -walter On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Chris Leonard wrote: > Here is the link I was looking for. > > >

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-05-02 Thread Chris Leonard
Here is the link I was looking for. http://docs.translatehouse.org/projects/translate-toolkit/en/latest/formats/subtitles.html cjl On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Chris Leonard wrote: > > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Walter Bender >

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-05-02 Thread Chris Leonard
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > FWIW, I wrote an app [1] to introduce teachers (in Australia) to the core > Sugar concepts (both UI and pedagogy). It would be easy to strip the app of > the AU-specifics. A bit more challenging for i18n since the

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-05-02 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Oh wow!! Amazing! :D I suggest transferring this to the github.com/sugarlabs org :D https://github.com/walterbender/training/settings I see there's a 3.61 branch, I'll make a PR to track merging it On 2 May 2016 at 10:11, Walter Bender wrote: > FWIW, I wrote an

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-05-02 Thread Walter Bender
FWIW, I wrote an app [1] to introduce teachers (in Australia) to the core Sugar concepts (both UI and pedagogy). It would be easy to strip the app of the AU-specifcs. A bit more challenging for i18n since the videos would need to be redone. It make a big difference in the speed in which we were

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-04-24 Thread Dave Crossland
On 24 April 2016 at 17:59, Sam Parkinson wrote: > You might be interested in this blog post that I wrote on the subject: > https://www.sam.today/blog/sugar-onboard-user-testing.html > AWESOME! :D Here's the full text, I think everyone should read it :D *Sugar Onboard:

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-04-24 Thread Sam Parkinson
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: Hi Sam! On 23 April 2016 at 00:45, Sam Parkinson wrote: I'm no longer afk. I have collated the results into the attached spreedsheet. Previously, I also wrote up an analysis of the

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-04-23 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Sam! On 23 April 2016 at 00:45, Sam Parkinson wrote: > > I'm no longer afk. I have collated the results into the attached > spreedsheet. > > Previously, I also wrote up an analysis of the results. It is also > attached. > Awesome!! I uploaded the files to the

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-04-22 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi! On 22 April 2016 at 09:01, Laura Vargas wrote: > Would be nice to have them published. > I'd like to help with this. Please could you share the Google Doc with me in edit mode, d.crossl...@gmail.com, so I can take a look at all the metadata? :) Cheers Dave

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-04-22 Thread Laura Vargas
Would be nice to have them published. Thanks Sam! 2016-04-12 11:24 GMT+08:00 Sam P. : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi Dave, > > I will remove this post asap. The survey had indeed stopped. > > I will release the results. Unfortunately I am currently

Re: [IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-04-12 Thread Sam P.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Dave, I will remove this post asap. The survey had indeed stopped. I will release the results. Unfortunately I am currently away from my laptop. Thanks, Sam On 12 April 2016 8:10:43 AM AEST, Dave Crossland wrote: >Hi Sam! >

[IAEP] 2015 SocialHelp Survey?

2016-04-11 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Sam! Pinned to the top of https://socialhelp.sugarlabs.org is a thread, "Survey - “How bad is Sugar (software)?”" Are the results of this survey available anywhere? :) If not, the survey contents is anonymous, so I don't see any reason to keep the full results private, but perhaps I'm