On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Sebastian Silva
sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote:
El 03/11/13 11:56, Walter Bender escribió:
Does this mean one will be able to create Sugar Activities from Turtle
Bocks
itself?
Not exactly. But you can sketch the behavior of a Sugar Activity,
e.g., paint,
My goal is not to replace Sugar (or Sugar activities) with Turtle
Blocks, but to use Turtle Blocks to make Sugar and Sugar activities
more transparent. I posit that once you have written a simple paint
program in Turtle Blocks, suddenly the underlying mechanics of the
Paint activity are more
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
My goal is not to replace Sugar (or Sugar activities) with Turtle
Blocks, but to use Turtle Blocks to make Sugar and Sugar activities
more transparent. I posit that once you have written a simple paint
program in Turtle
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Iain Brown Douglas
i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote:
Help 17 is at a point close to release, but in some essential ways, is, as
yet, unfinished.
It is largely updated in content, but there is still some very important
changes that have not been crossed off the
We still need a lot of L10n activity to get it fully ready for wide
use in Sugar Deployments in non-English countries.
http://translate.sugarlabs.org/projects/help_content/
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Iain Brown Douglas
i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote:
Help 17 is at a point close to
+1
We need improve the final pieces to get the localization done.
Kalpa and I did part of the work in the activity itself,
the missing part is the pootle stuff.
Gonzalo
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
We still need a lot of L10n activity to get
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0. A lot is new for both
users and developers, see the release notes
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Notes
Sources:
I don't have much of a clue about Write but... can you send the activity
log?
On 4 November 2013 16:14, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
we are proud to announce the release of Sugar 0.100.0. A
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have much of a clue about Write but... can you send the activity
log?
It unfortunately only contains a single line:
Terminated by signal 11, pid 14089 data (None, open file 'fdopen',
mode 'w' at 0x2e13540,
That's a segmentation fault I think. It would be good if you could launch
it with sugar-launch -d and post the backtrace., possibly after having
installed debug packages.
On 4 November 2013 21:25, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a segmentation fault I think. It would be good if you could launch it
with sugar-launch -d and post the backtrace., possibly after having
installed debug packages.
2Gb of debuginfo later I have the following:
Gonzalo - I'm sorry, I was unable to attend the SLOBs meeting today.
There are issues with doing PR about the release
* It's not clear to me where we are going. The OLPC/Sugar development
ecosystem seems to be at a crossroads. I am encouraged by the web activity
work, but don't understand the
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
Gonzalo - I'm sorry, I was unable to attend the SLOBs meeting today.
There are issues with doing PR about the release
* It's not clear to me where we are going. The OLPC/Sugar development
ecosystem seems to be at a
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll open a bug + patch.
On 4 November 2013 22:40, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's a segmentation fault I think. It would be
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then I'll
open a bug + patch.
Thanks! Let me know when you've got a patch and I'll test it.
Peter
On 4 November 2013 22:40, Peter Robinson
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll
open a bug + patch.
Thanks! Let me know when you've got a patch and
:)
On 5 November 2013 00:23, Chris Leonard cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com wrote:
I poked my abiword friends, expect the commit shortly.
cjl
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 5 November 2013 00:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Broken annotation in abiword. Trying to figure out the correct one then
I'll
I poked my abiword friends, expect the commit shortly.
cjl
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:07, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Broken
On 4 November 2013 22:53, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
* It's not clear to me where we are going.
I'm afraid you are not the only one feeling that way. It's much easier said
than done, but we need to figure out where we are going and to communicate
it clearly inside the community.
On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Sugar on Android or the Raspberry Pi might have an interesting
marketing effect but the result would be truly terrible as it would be
essentially unusable and have a terrible experience.
Can you elaborate on why you think
On 11/4/2013 4:17 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Sugar on Android or the Raspberry Pi might have an interesting
marketing effect but the result would be truly terrible as it would be
On 4 November 2013 22:53, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
* It's not clear to me where we are going. The OLPC/Sugar development
ecosystem seems to be at a crossroads. I am encouraged by the web activity
work, but don't understand the path of transposing the value proposition of
Sugar
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 November 2013 22:53, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
* It's not clear to me where we are going. The OLPC/Sugar development
ecosystem seems to be at a crossroads. I am encouraged by the web activity
work, but
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:40:51PM -0800, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
On 11/4/2013 4:17 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Sugar on Android or the Raspberry Pi might have an interesting
marketing effect but the
Hmm, I think we used Abi.init_noargs() in some way.
Sorry, was long time ago, I can't remember ...
Thanks Daniel
Gonzalo
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:13, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 November 2013 00:07,
Hi…
Last year at SCaLE George Hunt helped me get Sugar running on my RPi. Because
our booth was so busy, it took parts of both Saturday and Sunday to get it
going. I then tried it when I got home and found that it was prone to stalls.
Of course, this was back in late February and there may have
27 matches
Mail list logo
