Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-20 Thread José Miguel García
Hola! Estoy de acuerdo con lo que plantean Tony, Claudia. Entiendo que el foco debe estar en las nuevas formas de aprender de los niños. Saludos ___ Lic. José Miguel García Montevideo - Uruguay 2016-06-20 4:23 GMT-03:00 Tony Anderson : > Hi, Dave > >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-20 Thread Caryl Bigenho
Could someone find and post the current vision statement? After Wed when they finally come to hook up my slow, but very expensive, Internet connection, I'll be able to comment on the vision statement and possible additions and changes. Caryl Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 20, 2016, at 9:18 AM,

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi On 20 June 2016 at 03:23, Tony Anderson wrote: > > I disagree completely with this statement as a vision for Sugar Labs. > You already said that, but I am concerned with your position on the original. Laura quoted this in her email above, and it is on the wiki at

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-20 Thread Sean DALY
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > "About Sugar Labs(R): Sugar Labs(R) is a volunteer-driven member project > of Software Freedom Conservancy, a nonprofit corporation. Originally part > of the One Laptop Per Child project, Sugar Labs coordinates volunteers >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-20 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, Dave This email is a clear example of the confusion we are having. You describe it as a mission statement (not a vision statement). However, your title describes an 'update' to the current Sugar Labs vision statement. Could you provide the text of what you believe is the current Sugar

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Oversight Board decisions page

2016-06-20 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, Dave On 06/20/2016 05:20 AM, iaep-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org wrote: Adam asked me to diligently maintain the list of SLOB decisions going forwards, that Walter had put together from archives, at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions I have reviewed this page. You have

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-20 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, Dave It describes what we do. A mission statement usually describes the organizations goal, what it is trying to accomplish. Tony On 06/20/2016 05:17 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: Hi On 20 June 2016 at 03:23, Tony Anderson > wrote:

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Oversight Board decisions page

2016-06-20 Thread Caryl Bigenho
Tony is correct. Motions A and B have not been voted on yet. I am hoping they will be at the July meeting. Watch for my finalized versions later this week when I finally get internet at my MT home. Caryl Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 20, 2016, at 12:43 AM, Tony Anderson

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-06-20 Thread Sebastian Silva
Hi Claudia! Welcome to writing in Sugar Labs's lists. Please note replies are not "to all" by default (much like regular email). We did not get to see the email Dave is replying to. In the future please remember to copy the list in your replies as we are very much interested in your opinions.

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-06-20 Thread Sebastian Silva
Then it got rejected because she is subscribed with a different address. El 20/06/16 a las 23:41, Dave Crossland escribió: > On 21 June 2016 at 00:32, Sebastian Silva wrote: >> We did not get to see the email Dave is replying to. In the future please >> remember to

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Crossland
On 21 June 2016 at 00:32, Sebastian Silva wrote: > We did not get to see the email Dave is replying to. In the future please > remember to copy the list in your replies as we are very much interested in > your opinions. The mail from Claudia was sent to the lists:

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Oversight Board decisions page

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Crossland
On 21 June 2016 at 00:41, Laura Vargas wrote: > I'm sorry I don't do this myself but could you please add the 3 motions I > proposed for the 04/01/16 SLOBs meeting regarding the creation of the Sugar > Project's Translation Fund? > >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Oversight Board decisions page

2016-06-20 Thread Laura Vargas
2016-06-21 12:46 GMT+08:00 Dave Crossland : > On 21 June 2016 at 00:41, Laura Vargas wrote: > > I'm sorry I don't do this myself but could you please add the 3 motions I > > proposed for the 04/01/16 SLOBs meeting regarding the creation of the > Sugar > >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Crossland
On 20 June 2016 at 14:11, Tony Anderson wrote: > On 20 June 2016 at 11:17, Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 20 June 2016 at 03:23, Tony Anderson wrote: > > > > > > I disagree completely with this statement as a vision for Sugar Labs. > >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Claudia! On 20 June 2016 at 14:04, Claudia Urrea wrote: > > I think the wiki page summarizes the status of the motions, but we have to > find a way to link to the discussion or process. Should we number them? or > code them in a way that it helps the process? The

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Oversight Board decisions page

2016-06-20 Thread Laura Vargas
Hi Dave, 2016-06-21 11:37 GMT+08:00 Dave Crossland : > > Hi > > On 20 June 2016 at 02:43, Tony Anderson wrote: > >> I have reviewed this page. You have numbered the motions beginning with >> 2016-1. There are missing numbers after 14. > > > Walter added

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Crossland
On 21 June 2016 at 00:38, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Then it got rejected because she is subscribed with a different address. Ah yes, I identified this problem with Claudia's email before. Since you are an IAEP list admin, please can you just fix it? :)

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-06-20 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 20/06/16 a las 23:42, Claudia Urrea escribió: > I thought we have solved the issue, but it doesn't seem to be the case. No, you need to unsubscribe claudia@laptop and subscribe your new address for it to get fixed. When subscribers change their email addresses, usually they do this

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-20 Thread Claudia Urrea
Agree with Tony. The vision is about the goal we are trying to accomplish for children (and teachers) around the world, but the mechanism or strategies the organization needs to put in place in order to get there. Claudia (re-sent message) On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Tony Anderson

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] A Better Idea...

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi, On 20 June 2016 at 02:51, Tony Anderson wrote: > > Could you be specific on the necessary procedural actions that the Board > did not take? > Consideration of motions visible to Members. > Note that the Oversight Board/decisions page does not show the GSOC mentor >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Oversight Board decisions page

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi On 20 June 2016 at 02:43, Tony Anderson wrote: > I have reviewed this page. You have numbered the motions beginning with > 2016-1. There are missing numbers after 14. Walter added those; I've only maintained the new motions. Its a wiki, you can edit it, so if you'd

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Crossland
On 20 June 2016 at 12:00, Caryl Bigenho wrote: > Could someone find and post the current vision statement? After Wed when > they finally come to hook up my slow, but very expensive, Internet > connection, I'll be able to comment on the vision statement and possible >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Crossland
On Jun 20, 2016 11:57 AM, "Sean DALY" wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: >> >> "About Sugar Labs(R): Sugar Labs(R) is a volunteer-driven member project of Software Freedom Conservancy, a nonprofit corporation. Originally part of