Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] A Better Idea...

On 1 July 2016 at 07:06, Tony Anderson wrote: > > We got it. In the future, we will take greater care to cross-post votes by > email (hopefully rare since the meeting itself is public). I've heard that before, and this seems proven sure to fail. But I don't think I can

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] A Better Idea...

Dave We got it. In the future, we will take greater care to cross-post votes by email (hopefully rare since the meeting itself is public). Tony On 07/01/2016 12:57 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: On 1 July 2016 at 05:45, Tony Anderson wrote: You need to distinguish

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] A Better Idea...

On 1 July 2016 at 05:45, Tony Anderson wrote: > > You need to distinguish between encouraging members to propose actions to be > taken by the Board and a motion made at a Board meeting by a member of the > Board, seconded and put to a vote of the Board members. I got it :)

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] A Better Idea...

Hi, Dave You need to distinguish between encouraging members to propose actions to be taken by the Board and a motion made at a Board meeting by a member of the Board, seconded and put to a vote of the Board members. Tony ___ IAEP -- It's An

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] A Better Idea...

Hi Tony On 1 July 2016 at 00:46, Tony Anderson wrote: > > Your motion has never been presented to the Board. I feel very frustrated with your proposition that members can not present motions to the board. You see, of the 6 motions that have passed since I joined the

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] A Better Idea...

Adam - sorry, caught again by the 'reply list' button. Tony On 06/30/2016 07:10 PM, Tony Anderson wrote: Hi, Dave Your motion has never been presented to the Board. I have no specific knowledge that all members oppose it. Your record of decisions includes many items that have never become