second.
-walter
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Mel Chua m...@melchua.com wrote:
After an extended post-SLOBs discussion in #sugar, SeanDaly, cjb,
walterbender, sdziallas, myself (and possibly others I've missed -
tomeu, bernie, and dave_b contributed to the earlier discussion) came up
It's up for a vote. So far we have two 'aye' votes (mchua, cjb), and
need 2 more to pass.
MOTION: Yes, Sugar on a Stick should be reserved by Sugar Labs for use
by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed
effectively, until such time when a trademark policy, agreement, and
Reminder, this was for question 3 of the Decision Panel.
I vote aye to this motion.
Sean
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 17:09, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
MOTION: Yes, Sugar on a Stick should be reserved by
aye.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
Reminder, this was for question 3 of the Decision Panel.
I vote aye to this motion.
Sean
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 17:09, Chris Ball
And the motion passes! FOR THE WIN!
MOTION: Yes, Sugar on a Stick should be reserved by Sugar
Labs for use by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can
be marketed effectively, until such time when a trademark
policy, agreement, and process is put in place: SoaS will be
the first
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 12:04 -0500, Mel Chua wrote:
MOTION: Yes, Sugar on a Stick should be reserved by Sugar Labs for
use by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed
effectively, until such time when a trademark policy, agreement, and
process is put in place: SoaS will be
