Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

Cool. Good news. Please Laura, keep us inform about the work done. Best regards. Lionel. 2017-09-29 20:10 GMT+02:00 Laura Vargas : > > Thank you very much Sameer! > > I have updated the wiki decisions >

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

Thank you very much Sameer! I have updated the wiki decisions page and hope to schedule the maintenance tasks for Sugar Network implementation in Perú ASAP. Achieving sustainability in the future will depend on the

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

Sorry, but I've been traveling, so didn't see this. For a one time maintenance, I'll give it a +1. However, this project needs to find better ways to sustain. Sameer On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Laura Vargas wrote: > > > 2017-09-26 21:44 GMT-05:00 Chris Leonard

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

2017-09-26 21:44 GMT-05:00 Chris Leonard : > top-posting because of thread length. > > 1) The original request was posted 2017-04-02, how urgent can it really be > if it has been impossible to find someone to step up and volunteer 20 > minutes to do this in the past six

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

thanks chris, interesting questions. i'll have a go at answering based on my observations. 1) urgency will grow as the problem continues to be unresolved, and a customer has probably complained to their contractor; but it is hard to find a volunteer to work on something that is used mostly by

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

top-posting because of thread length. 1) The original request was posted 2017-04-02, how urgent can it really be if it has been impossible to find someone to step up and volunteer 20 minutes to do this in the past six months? 2) Has any other maintenance been performed on this server in the last

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

Dear Sameer, You probably missed this motion as we didn't get your vote. Today, we are still in need of funding due to recurrent *spam attacks* we have had during previous months, and given the fact that we are serving a large group of active users during the local school year, I hope the board

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

2017-04-24 22:24 GMT-05:00 Dave Crossland : > > Hi Laura > > Hola Dave > I sympathize with your concern for active users. > I recommend you read the translation of "Como hacer un proptotipo?" made by Valerie Taylor

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

Hi Laura I sympathize with your concern for active users. But my recommendation is to use this as motivation to shut down Sugar Network. In my opinion: Everything associated with the old Python codebase has entered terminal decline, is no longer sustainable, and should be archived and turned

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

> > > I think we can wait a bit longer for Adam and Sameer to register their > votes. > > -walter > >> >> Walter, Now that motion failed, I'm totally out of ideas on how to achieve our maintenance goals. Spam was not a problem for the first 3 years of Sugar Network and now it consumes lot's of

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

2017-04-21 14:48 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender : > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Laura Vargas > wrote: > >> >> As I have come to understand I, Laura was ineligible to vote according to >> the Conflict of Interest Policy of Conservancy. >> >> So,

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

I abstain as I see real arguments on both sides, and apologize I am torn. On Apr 21, 2017 3:49 PM, "Walter Bender" wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Laura Vargas > wrote: > >> >> As I have come to understand I, Laura was ineligible to

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Laura Vargas wrote: > > As I have come to understand I, Laura was ineligible to vote according to > the Conflict of Interest Policy of Conservancy. > > So, we had 6 eligible votes with the following results during the voting > period by

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

As I have come to understand I, Laura was ineligible to vote according to the Conflict of Interest Policy of Conservancy. So, we had 6 eligible votes with the following results during the voting period by email: 3 votes on favor (Ignacio, Samson and Lionel) 1 vote against (Walter) no votes

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

Well as I said +1. Lets hope everything gets resolved ASAP On 4/17/17, Walter Bender wrote: > -1 from me. It seems an arbitrary and unscalable request. > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Laura Vargas > wrote: > >> Ignacio, I believe you'll

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

+1 for me. On Apr 13, 2017 11:25 AM, "Lionel Laské" wrote: > Motion: Urgent maintenance budget of 500$ for fixing spam attacks on Sugar > Network. Detail of the tasks to do are described in the Technical Service > Request provided by Laura. It's an one shot motion to

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

Motion: Urgent maintenance budget of 500$ for fixing spam attacks on Sugar Network. Detail of the tasks to do are described in the Technical Service Request provided by Laura. It's an one shot motion to avoid interruption of service for Sugar Network users. Further investments on Sugar Network

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

Thank you Lionel, Samson and Ignacio! The formal procedure requires a SLOB to propose "A motion" and then another SLOB to second it. In this way all other SLOBs will understand they are called to vote. I would appreciate if you guys can do this. Blessings and regards Laura V 2017-04-09 11:36

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

I'm agree with the idea to think to the long-term but I think we can't leave loyal Sugar user without their tools. So +1 to process this TSR considering we can't process other requests without thinking to the long term support of Sugar Network. Lionel. 2017-04-08 16:39 GMT+02:00 Laura

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

Once we solve the urgent need to neutralize Spam attacks, I would love to open the discussion for long-term support. Regards 2017-04-08 9:34 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender : > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Laura Vargas > wrote: > >> We have

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > We have supported Sugar Network on a voluntary basis without retribution > since it's deployment on 2014. Unfortunately we ran out of resources and > can't afford to dedicate the required time. > This begs the

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

We have supported Sugar Network on a voluntary basis without retribution since it's deployment on 2014. Unfortunately we ran out of resources and can't afford to dedicate the required time. Regards Laura 2017-04-08 9:24 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender : > This document helps

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

This document helps clarify what work needs to be done. What is not clear to me is why this is work that needs to be funded as opposed to being done by volunteers. -walter On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > Hello all, > > As per SLOB's request in

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

It's +1 from me as well. I've seen what this guys have done in past, and by keeping the support of Sugar Network, we indirectly increase our users (not sugarlabs directly, but sugar itself). So I think it benefits all :) Sorry for my bad English, Ignacio

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Technical Service Request - Project: Sugar Network

+1 from me. Samson On Apr 8, 2017 1:43 PM, "Laura Vargas" wrote: > Hello all, > > As per SLOB's request in yesterday's meeting, I'm attaching the Sugar > Network urgent maintenance project proposal. > > I hope this documents covers all the information required by SLOB's