Re: [IAEP] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
On 19 June 2016 at 13:50, Sean DALY wrote: > If the subject is Pending Motion 2016-33, I am opposed to it for the > previously stated reasons. That motion failed 9 days ago, since email voting is only open for 7 days. Sorry I hadn't updated the

Re: [IAEP] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-19 Thread Sean DALY
If the subject is Pending Motion 2016-33, I am opposed to it for the previously stated reasons. The key activity of SL is developing software designed to help children learn, not providing a friendly environment to learn programming of software for children. Sean. On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:06

Re: [IAEP] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-19 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi I would appreciate public consideration of this motion by each member of SLOB. On 3 June 2016 at 14:25, Laura Vargas wrote: > I hereby propose the motion to update current SL vision statement: > > "About Sugar Labs(R): Sugar Labs(R) is a volunteer-driven member

Re: [IAEP] Motion to update current SL vision statement

2016-06-03 Thread Dave Crossland
Thank you for posting this motion, Laura! :) ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep