On 2012-09-13, at 06:01, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
I would like to see Sugar Activities able to run in Gnome and vice versa. As
far as I know, TurtleArt is the only one that does both.
Etoys and Scratch, too (which preceded Sugar, but not everyone might know this).
- Bert -
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 2012-09-13, at 06:01, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
I would like to see Sugar Activities able to run in Gnome and vice versa. As
far as I know, TurtleArt is the only one that does both.
Etoys and Scratch, too
I've done a little work on sugar-android pathways, including a (still
incomplete) port of gtk3 to android. The primary tasks would be: 1)
gtk/python container to run gtk3/py-gobject activities unmodified in
Android; 2) reimplementation of Journal as Android service (using intents);
3)
Thanks Scott,
Can you think about explaining this in person in San Francisco anytime
Oct 19-24 during our 2 OLPC/Sugar events there?
http://olpcSF.org/summit EARLY DRAFT SCHEDULE POSTED (Oct 19-21)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugarcamp_SF_2012 30 PRELIMINARY
RSVP'S SO FAR (Oct
-0400
From: csc...@laptop.org
To: walter.ben...@gmail.com
CC: iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [IAEP] evolution or revolution? .android+sugar+doors = oui?
I've done a little work on sugar-android pathways, including a (still
incomplete) port of gtk3 to android. The primary tasks would be: 1
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Adam Holt h...@laptop.org wrote:
Can you think about explaining this in person in San Francisco anytime Oct
19-24 during our 2 OLPC/Sugar events there?
http://olpcSF.org/summit EARLY DRAFT SCHEDULE POSTED (Oct 19-21)
Hi David
You have written a wide ranging piece which is difficult for me to respond to
comprehensively, please permit me to respond to just a few points.
1) Working against school systems
Though Sugar/OLPC are unashamedly constructivist/constructionist, I don't think
it is accurate to
