Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 08/16/07 23:06:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
>> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 08/16/07 15:44:
>>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
when i compile my kernel without generic dock/bay support, there is no
/proc/acpi/ibm/bay, is that behaviou
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 08/16/07 15:44:
> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
> >> when i compile my kernel without generic dock/bay support, there is no
> >> /proc/acpi/ibm/bay, is that behaviour correct?
> >
> > Yes, the generic bay and dock
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 08/16/07 15:44:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
>> when i compile my kernel without generic dock/bay support, there is no
>> /proc/acpi/ibm/bay, is that behaviour correct?
>
> Yes, the generic bay and dock work differently to send their notifications.
> I d
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
> when i compile my kernel without generic dock/bay support, there is no
> /proc/acpi/ibm/bay, is that behaviour correct?
Yes, the generic bay and dock work differently to send their notifications.
I don't recall exactly how though, so you'd have to look at
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 08/16/07 15:05:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
>> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 08/16/07 14:27:
>> so i can not use this hotkeys?
>
> Which hot keys? bay and dock support in thinkpad-acpi has nothing to do
> with hot keys, AFAIK.
>
sorry i mean the bay a
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 08/16/07 14:27:
> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
> >> OK, I used the generic bay/dock support, but if I compile generic dock
> >> and bay functions as module, /proc/acpi/ibm/bay is not present
> >
> > Correct. I do
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 08/16/07 14:27:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
>> OK, I used the generic bay/dock support, but if I compile generic dock
>> and bay functions as module, /proc/acpi/ibm/bay is not present
>
> Correct. I don't know if I will fix that, as generic bay/dock is
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
> OK, I used the generic bay/dock support, but if I compile generic dock
> and bay functions as module, /proc/acpi/ibm/bay is not present
Correct. I don't know if I will fix that, as generic bay/dock is the way to
go for the futurue, anyway.
--
"One dis
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 08/16/07 07:01:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
>> with latest kernel (2.6.22.3) and latest thikpad-acpi (from 20070815) i
>> missed the following acpi events on my thinkpad r60 (bay is present on
>> bootup)
>>
>> ibm/bay MSTR 0003 -- eject requ
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Peter Jordan wrote:
> with latest kernel (2.6.22.3) and latest thikpad-acpi (from 20070815) i
> missed the following acpi events on my thinkpad r60 (bay is present on
> bootup)
>
> ibm/bay MSTR 0003 -- eject request
> ibm/bay MSTR 0001 -- eject lever
Hello,
with latest kernel (2.6.22.3) and latest thikpad-acpi (from 20070815) i
missed the following acpi events on my thinkpad r60 (bay is present on
bootup)
ibm/bay MSTR 0003 -- eject request
ibm/bay MSTR 0001 -- eject lever inserted
Any ideas?
Thank,
PJ
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
