> When I attempted to report in a PMR a deficiency in ISRDDN
> which I perceived as a problem, IBM Support's response
included:
>
>3) ISRDDN was designed for use by IBM service. "ISRDDN is
a utility
> that assists IBM support in evaluating and solving
problems,"
> according to the
In a message dated 7/23/2005 11:28:50 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A developer would never be able to complete a single product using that
methodology. The target, both in terms of hardware technology and gaming
standards, moves faster than you could write the cod
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:38:21 EDT, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Guess the argument is the chipset is so robust, don't want the
>bloat of XP interfering with splaterring of aliens or monsters
>or police officers and hearing the lamentations of the vanquished.
Who's argument? Who would m
The recommendation is now PC=YES which will be the only option from V8.
Isaac Yassin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 6:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RSVNONR -DB2
In a
I am currently working on doing a study of using CICSPLEX static & dynamic
routing for distributed transaction processing (DTP) requests.
We have an application written in C++ that talks with CICS region-A using
APPC over LU6.2 sessions through VTAM. We run DTP transaction requests
from the applic
5 matches
Mail list logo