Re: TSO Unallocate Dataset.

2005-07-23 Thread David Alcock
> When I attempted to report in a PMR a deficiency in ISRDDN > which I perceived as a problem, IBM Support's response included: > >3) ISRDDN was designed for use by IBM service. "ISRDDN is a utility > that assists IBM support in evaluating and solving problems," > according to the

Re: The clamor begins for IBM to give up the code for OS/2

2005-07-23 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 7/23/2005 11:28:50 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A developer would never be able to complete a single product using that methodology. The target, both in terms of hardware technology and gaming standards, moves faster than you could write the cod

Re: The clamor begins for IBM to give up the code for OS/2

2005-07-23 Thread Scott Rowe
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:38:21 EDT, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Guess the argument is the chipset is so robust, don't want the >bloat of XP interfering with splaterring of aliens or monsters >or police officers and hearing the lamentations of the vanquished. Who's argument? Who would m

Re: RSVNONR -DB2

2005-07-23 Thread Isaac Yassin
The recommendation is now PC=YES which will be the only option from V8. Isaac Yassin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Finnell Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 6:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RSVNONR -DB2 In a

CICSPLEX support for DTP/APPC

2005-07-23 Thread Vijaykumar Niranjan
I am currently working on doing a study of using CICSPLEX static & dynamic routing for distributed transaction processing (DTP) requests. We have an application written in C++ that talks with CICS region-A using APPC over LU6.2 sessions through VTAM. We run DTP transaction requests from the applic