1. Is it required or recommended in Sysplex system
with DB2 data sharing to have more than one CP in the
CPC.
2. Which is better to have CPC with one CP as example
200 Mips, or CPC with two CPs each 100 Mips.
If I'm not mistaken DB2 multithreads therefor having multiple CP is
advantageous, with
Hi,
I'm going to simplify this a bit to show you the differences.
First, CICS has multiple kernels which can execute in parallel if the CP's
are available to use. While most of the work can happen in the
Application Kernel, it's by no means all of the work that CICS does to
support the tasks it
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 02:57:41 -0600, Brian Westerman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to simplify this a bit to show you the differences.
In the same line of speach :-)
I am going to give you the real life example !
OA03194 was created in order to limit the number of SRB's an exploiter may
From: Bruno Sugliani
OA03194 was created in order to limit the number of SRB's an exploiter may
have running in the connector's address space.
( for your own sake do not apply it )
I am the guy who got hit with my small data sharing configuration ( 2 x
z/990 with only 2 engines each )
This
Shmuel,
Whoops - brain fart. Bits per inch = bpi, but that's really bits per inch
per track!
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Sent: Sunday, 13 November 2005 7:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
I'm getting the above error, I'm stumped, and I'm wondering if anyone has
any insights.
The environment is a large, complex Rexx program under development and
running under IRXJCL. It does a lot of things, among them allocating files
dynamically (using my own assembler code routine) and ATTACHing
Baldor Electric seems to have done a pretty good job with SAP. Granted,
they're not as big as the United States Navy, but maybe there are some
good lessons.
http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3526086
[ For the Internet-impaired, a press release version:
Yes, at 250 a copy...!
- Original Message -
From: Stephen M. Wiegand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: Looking for a copy of Advanced Assembler Language and MVS
Interfaces : For IBM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ibm-main
Sent: Sunday 13 November 2005 01:42
IBM keep insisting that all the old UP problems are a thing
of the past - only an oldtimer would argue ... :o)
But remember the good old
On Nov 13, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Ray Mullins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ibm-main
Sent: Sunday 13 November 2005 01:42
IBM keep insisting that all the old UP problems are a thing
of the past - only an oldtimer would
Now if we can just make Java run better on z/Architecture. :-D
Is it z/Architecture, or z/OS? How's Java for Linux for z/Series?
(Is it even available? See -- we're not quite Solarized yet.) Is
Yes it's available, and in my opinion, it needs improvements too.
Java is Java. Takes more machine
Thanks for everyone for your suggestion.
Niran Kamaksorn
Bangkok, Thailand
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Hi, all
Are there any way to perform file I/O in Assembler program without
define a DD card in the calling JCL. For some reason, I want to give the
file name in Assembler source, not in the calling JCL. Can OPEN macro do
that?
By the way, I can't find the description of some macro such as
Unfortunately, with a max of 128 gig of real, that would leave
you with the requirement to attach a zillion page packs to the system.
Performance would probably not be too good.
Not to mention with a wait stated system, since you cannot 'attach a zillion
page packs'. You are limited to 253x4GB
I believe that the original question was about the CPC having only one
processor. Since the topic implies sysplex and hence a CF, I would strongly
recommend against sharing one processor between a CF and an lpar, especially
in production, assuming that the lpar is on the same CPC as the CF and the
15 matches
Mail list logo
