On Tue, 1 May 2007 20:58:09 -0400 Jim Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: The z/OS 1.9 manuals will document the mechanism for creating an
:architecturally reusable address space under z/OS and the programming
:issues for making use of these address spaces, so that may
:make the picture a bit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on.com...
In Setting Up A Sysplex (SA22-7625-12) page 31 states ...
This is the best answer to this question.
One of the things that should belong to the standard knowledge toolbox
of any systems programmer: Setting Up A Sysplex will
Hallo To All,
I am executing a DFDSS logical backup of MULTIPLE volumes and I received the
following message:
ADR421E (025)-DTDSC(01), DATA SET SYS2.AM.MYCAT NOT PROCESSED, FULLY
QUALIFIED NAME NOT PASSED, 2
I verified the dataset which is a CATALOG and it is correct. I did a listcat
Is there a SFTP client that can run on z/OS 1.7 without needing Unix System
Services?
TIA
John
--
NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
intended by Convergys Corporation for the use of the named individual or
entity to which it is directed and may contain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a SFTP client that can run on z/OS 1.7 without needing Unix System
Services?
TIA
John
Typically, the only type of files that sftp can transfer is HFS files.
Why do you want to avoid UNIX System Services? What do you want to use
sftp for?
--
Ulrich Boche
SVA
Internal server error
An internal server error occurred while processing your request. Please try
again or report the problem to IBMLink customer support.
meanwhile, 3270 interface working JUST FINE AND HAPPY.
--
For
Ulrich,
Typically, the only type of files that sftp can transfer is HFS files.
Why do you want to avoid UNIX System Services? What do you want to use
sftp for?
The datasets are z/os (mvs)and I was trying to see if we could use sftp
without copying the data to HFS file(s).
Regards,
John
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 07:27 -0400, John Kington wrote:
Is there a SFTP client that can run on z/OS 1.7 without needing Unix System
Services?
While we're casting wishful dreams around, anyone know of a z/OS that
can run without needing Unix System Services?
Just asking ...
Shane ...
On a call to IBM trying to open a SEV1 about the outage now...Steve.
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Robert Justice wrote:
Internal server error
An internal server error occurred while processing your request. Please try
again or report the problem to IBMLink customer support.
meanwhile, 3270 interface
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Ware
On a call to IBM trying to open a SEV1 about the outage now...Steve.
Ditto.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Shock and surprise, web ibmlink broken again, meanwhile 3270 interface
working just FINE AND HAPPY.
Now, I know this is a trick question, and let's think real hard on this shall
we,
but which one is it we should be getting rid of again?
I have defined two stand-alone drives 3590 model E.
When I display the drives using D U,,,ccuu command I get '359S' as device type.
The 'S' mean cartridge stack loader. (BTW: 'L' would mean library drive).
However my drives don't have the loader. I reviewed HCD panels looking for some
device
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
Shock and surprise, web ibmlink broken again, meanwhile 3270
interface working just FINE AND HAPPY.
Now, I know this is a trick question, and let's think real
hard on this shall we,
but which
Now, I know this is a trick question, and let's think real
hard on this shall we,
but which one is it we should be getting rid of again?
Why, *obviously* we need to get rid of the 3270 interface.
You are correct, we have a winner! Obviously, the one that is always working
is the one
... I don't know of a way to get SMP/E to assign
different attributes to a load module in a distribution zone than what is
assigned in the target zone.
In this case, the target libraries are built with Binder JCLIN rather than
IEBCOPY, so different PARM values in UTILITY entries for the target
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kington
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SFTP Client for z/OS
Is there a SFTP client that can run on z/OS 1.7 without
needing Unix System
On Tue, 1 May 2007 17:36:34 -0500, Mark Steely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For question 1 this is IBM recommendation:
CLASSDEF CLASS(LARGE) CLASSLEN(16316) GROUP(UNDESIG)
CLASSDEF CLASS(DEFAULT) CLASSLEN(956) GROUP(UNDESIG)
LOCALMSG MAXMSG(2000) CLASS(DEFAULT)
Thank You
That's only part of the
SSH Tectia Server might do what you need. You can securely transfer MVS
datasets with it. See www.ssh.com.
Beth
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Kington
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 8:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Hi John,
I think that is just a requirement of DFSMSdss that when it is to
process
a Catalog, then you have to specify the fully qualified name. I don't know
off the top of my head what the rationale at the time was, but I imagine it
is to protect you from accidentally processing a User
On Tue, 1 May 2007 15:10:23 -0400, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Put this in a SYSPROC/SYSEXEC library and use it as a line command in
3.4
snip
Looks *very* similar to mine:
/* REXX */
/* */
/* AUTHOR: Mark Zelden
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
Now, I know this is a trick question, and let's think real hard on
this shall we, but which one is it we should be getting rid
of again?
Why, *obviously* we need to get rid of the 3270
So Andrew, are you saying that
Include(**,SYS2.AM.MYCAT)would have worked? Or does the catalog need
to be addressed in a separate step?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew N Wilt [
Subject: Re: Help needed : ADR421E
Hi John,
I think that is just a requirement of DFSMSdss that when
Depending upon what you're trying to do, you can use FTPs - which is plain
old MVS FTP with security, eg
SECURE_DATACONN PRIVATE
SECURE_CTRLCONN PRIVATE
SECURE_FTP REQUIRED
SECURE_LOGINREQUIRED
SECURE_PBSZ 16384
KEYRING /my/keyfile.kdb
EXTENSIONS AUTH_TLS
It's usually the other way around, eg Include(SYS2.AM.MYCAT,**), but that
works.
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
You're right Jack, that would make more sense.
-Original Message-
From: Jack Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 10:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Help needed : ADR421E
It's usually the other way around, eg Include(SYS2.AM.MYCAT,**), but
that
You are correct, we have a winner! Obviously, the one that is always working
is the one that should be eliminated !
Isn't that why we are eliminating all mainframes?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
Ron Hawkins wrote:
Actually RMF doesn't sample for CPU busy. It uses counters that accumulate
dispatch time for the LPARs.
Even the old MVS CPU busy is the complement of the accumulated time a CPU is
waiting.
Most ISV monitors get their data from the same source as RMF.
I agree that part
This was a topic back in the spring of 2003. I have an issue with this topic
again, so I'm starting a new thread, with a slightly different twist.
Many shops utilize running their system as an MVS guest under VM at DR
(Disaster Recovery) sites. Been doing that for years. We IPL our z/OS 1.4
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Jaffe) writes:
I agree that part of what I wrote is misleading because I was thinking
about processor resource contention analysis when
Yes. Either way should work. (**,SYS2.AM.MYCAT) or (SYS2.AM.MYCAT,**)
Thanks,
Andrew Wilt
IBM DFSMSdss Architecture/Development
Tucson, Arizona
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 05/02/2007
07:16:54 AM:
So Andrew, are you saying that
Include(**,SYS2.AM.MYCAT)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 10:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: MVS as a guest OS at D/R
SNIP
For some unknown and undetermined reason, z/OS is NOT looking for the
we've had periodic problems with this but went to ibm's recommendations,
viz
o If you are using LPARNAME in parmlib, any reference should
also have a reference to VMUSERID. These VMUSERID statements can and
must be before LPARNAME and can remain in your system at home and
will
I'm looking to implement a solution to create PGP encrypted files at well
I know I can use SSL, now TLS, in FTP so that data is encrypted during
transmission, but the data would be left in plain text on the destination
file server, which is likely to be a server that is, shall we say, less than
what about pkware to zip and encrypt file...?
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
only for
The first reaction is that your situation is political, not technical.
That is, management simply does not want to hear that an upgrade is
needed. There are no numbers that will ever completely satisfy this
situation, except the number of times SLA's are not met.
But this worked once, and it
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/01/2007
at 11:25 AM, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This calulates the offset of the middle element of a table FSVO
middle. r2 = table entry length
r3 = (non-zero) table length
BXLE R2,R2,* DOUBLE OFFSET UNTIL TAB SIZE
SRL
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/01/2007
at 01:43 PM, Ira Broussard [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I understand the linkage editor can split a record anywhere it wants.
However, why does that cause a problem if I am concatenating all of
the records for a load module into a single variable and scanning
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 05/02/2007
at 07:27 AM, John Kington [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there a SFTP client that can run on z/OS 1.7 without needing Unix
System Services?
Is there a TCP/IP stack that can run on z/OS 1.7 without needing Unix
System Services?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
Mark,
I ran into similar problems at a previous site when running as VM guests at the
hot site. Ours turned out to be related to the way we had the LOADxx
member coded. We had one LOADxx used by all systems at the site with
HWNAME and LPARNAME filter statements coded so each system would
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SFTP Client for z/OS
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
convergys.com,
on 05/02/2007
at
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 05/02/2007
11:11:16 AM:
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 05/02/2007
at 07:27 AM, John Kington [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there a SFTP client that can run on z/OS 1.7 without needing Unix
System Services?
Is there a TCP/IP stack that
Ulrich, John, Seymour and Jack,
Thanks for the replies. It looks like the least painful way is to
copy the data from mvs dataset(s) to hfs file(s) so that the
OpenSSH port client can read them. I was just hoping there
were no walls between Unix System Services and z/OS.
Regards,
John
OpenPGP for z/OS http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/csdd1120.pdf
snip
This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be
privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or
In a recent note, Kurt Quackenbush said:
Subject: Re: Mark load module non-executable
No need to mess with UTILITY entries. It is a simple matter to assign
module attributes in the dlib different than in the target lib.
The values found on the LEPARM operand on ++MOD are used when
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Kurt Quackenbush said:
Subject: Re: Mark load module non-executable
No need to mess with UTILITY entries. It is a simple matter to assign
module attributes in the dlib different than in the target lib.
The values found on the LEPARM operand on
In a recent note, Steve Comstock said:
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:11:37 -0600
I always think of OL for use when you Assemble and bind
a module that has only data, like a look up table. Never
intend to execute it.
Duh! Thanks.
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
On Wed, 2 May 2007 10:09:03 -0600 Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Agreed. Now, I'm curious: what's the design motivation for OL? Why
:should a developer choose to constrain a programmer to invoke a module
:by LOAD-CALL-DELETE rather than LINK (and incidentally never by
:EXEC PGM=...)?
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 11:35, Dana Mitchell wrote:
Mark,
I ran into similar problems at a previous site when running as VM guests at
the hot site. Ours turned out to be related to the way we had the LOADxx
member coded. We had one LOADxx used by all systems at the site with
HWNAME and
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
On Wed, 2 May 2007 11:15:46 -0400, Jack Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we've had periodic problems with this but went to ibm's recommendations,
If you are using LPARNAME in parmlib, any reference should
also have a reference to VMUSERID. These VMUSERID statements can and
must be before
In reading the pops manual, it would seem that the last 4 digits of the CPU id
number are unique for a CPU within a machine. For a machine that has multiple
CP's, how does this number change within the machine to identify all CP's in
the machine ??
--Dave Day
I am fairly sure that on CECs with multiple CPs, the output from the
STIDP is identical on all CPs. In the programming notes, it states:
quote
When the format bit is one, the CPU-identification number identifies
the system configuration as opposed to an individual CPU within the
John Kington wrote on IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 05/02/2007 10:47:41 AM:
I misstated. I meant reading an mvs dataset directly instead of having
to copy the data to hfs file. I hate to duplicate data and effort.
From my notes, one of these should work from Unix.
snip
K, one question about the above def? Can I have this defined in my PROD
system PARMLIB (VMUSERID) stuff, w/o VM and/or running as an MVS guest?
Just so I won't have to make a change at the DR?? If not, I can add the
changes required at the DR and doc it in the DR script, no problem.
snip
Paul Gilmartin writes:
Now, I'm curious: what's the design motivation for OL? Why
should a developer choose to constrain a programmer to invoke a module
by LOAD-CALL-DELETE rather than LINK (and incidentally never by
EXEC PGM=...)?
My own practice is to mark bound table RSECTs, which contain
I must be looking at too old of a manualwhat z/OS level are you using?
- Original Message -
From: McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: Interpreting output of STIDP
I am fairly
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 13:06, John P Kalinich wrote:
John Kington wrote on IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 05/02/2007 10:47:41 AM:
I misstated. I meant reading an mvs dataset directly instead of having
to copy the data to hfs file. I hate to duplicate data and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Day
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 1:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Interpreting output of STIDP
I must be looking at too old of a manualwhat z/OS level
are you
Everytime a new cpu is announced, with new functionality, we get a new
release of the operating system to go with it. So, in my mind, I have
associated changes in the hardware functionality with a change in the
operating system. But I guess that's not entirely accurate, is it. Thanks
for
On Wed, 2 May 2007 13:16:06 -0400, Jack Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
OK, one question about the above def? Can I have this defined in my PROD
system PARMLIB (VMUSERID) stuff, w/o VM and/or running as an MVS guest?
Just so I won't have to make a change at the DR?? If not, I can add the
Mark,
Yes, you can add them to your PROD system parmlib as long as you make
sure and follow the note above about VMUSERID construct(s) must preceed
any LPARNAME (and I would add before any HWNAME constructs too). That is
exactly what caused our problems.
Dana
On Wed, 2 May 2007 11:50:34
In a message dated 5/2/2007 12:04:15 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I read this to mean that in a multiple CP CEC, STIDP will store a '1'b
in bit 48, indicating this is a CEC identification, not a single CP
identification. In this case, you need to use the STAP
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:59:04 -0400, Pinnacle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John,
RMM can now protect by dataset name on the tape, not just OWNER, so
take a
look at that. I'm not a big fan of VLPOOL. Not sure why turning off
TAPEVOL would affect BLP, other than BLP access would give blanket
Just for fun, I'm testing weird JCL things. A couple of things that
I've found that are weird are:
1) If you do something like:
//OPROC PROC
//IPROC PROC
//STEP2 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
// PEND
// PEND
//XSTEP EXEC PROC=OPROC
//RSTEP EXEC
John, As R.S. already has said, Z/OS 1.8 offers some alternatives from the
traditional RACF tape data set protection. That is worth a look for those
wanting to use just DATASET profiles. You can also get BLP authorization
included even though TAPEVOL is not ACTIVE.
Mike WoodRMM
On Wed, 2 May 2007 11:09:26 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
No it isn't. Further, even if you revised the code to remove the
control and control/RLD records, you'd still have to deal with gaps.
The only bulletproof way to do it is to pre-allocate a variable to the
In a recent note, McKown, John said:
Subject: Re: SFTP Client for z/OS
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John P Kalinich
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 12:06 PM
John Kington wrote on IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on
On Wed, 2 May 2007 14:31:30 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You are correct, we have a winner! Obviously, the one that is always
working is the one that should be eliminated !
Isn't that why we are eliminating all mainframes?
I suppose someone in IBM decided that it was cheaper to
This is not anything I have ever seen in HCD.
I am not familiar with a true 3590, but it sounds more like the setup of the
drives themselves to me. For example I know an STK 9840 drive can be setup to
emulate a 3490E, 3590, etc.
Does the DEVSERV QTAPE command display anything interesting?
In a recent note, John Kington said:
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:49:04 -0400
Ulrich, John, Seymour and Jack,
Thanks for the replies. It looks like the least painful way is to
copy the data from mvs dataset(s) to hfs file(s) so that the
OpenSSH port client can read them. I was just
If PGP is a requirment, SecureZIP for z/OS does not support PGP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what about pkware to zip and encrypt file...?
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/02/2007
at 10:04 AM, Mark H. Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyone ever experience such a situation? Or can anybody speak to the
possible root cause, off the top of your head?
Wrong CPUID in directory? Wrong IPL parameters?
What do you have in IPLPARM? Is it
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/02/2007
at 02:37 PM, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The other pretty bulletproof technique (as mentioned several times in
this thread) is to load the load module.
Yes, but the OP wanted to do it in REXX. Personally, I'd either do it
in assembler or write
73 matches
Mail list logo
