Sheesh! You guys seem to lose the plot pretty quick. I guess it's
Friday so a bunch of you are off re-fighting WW2 or whatever, while
your putative employers are selling your jobs off at one-third
price and you're puzzled about it all.
I suspect Gary Green was spot on when he wrote:
Bruce Hewson wrote:
Well folks,
until M$ came along, and before KiB became a standard, I was taught the
convention as:
Disk: always use decimal value, i.e. KB = 1000 Bytes.
Memory: always use binary value, i.e. KB = 1024 Bytes.
That made it easy:.
It's not easy. For example, you
R.S. wrote:
Bruce Hewson wrote:
Well folks,
until M$ came along, and before KiB became a standard, I was taught
the convention as:
Disk: always use decimal value, i.e. KB = 1000 Bytes.
Memory: always use binary value, i.e. KB = 1024 Bytes.
That made it easy:.
It's not easy. For
The point I was making was that the PKM for a newly-attached TCB did not
include key 9. Yet, after recovering from an abend via ESTAE, the key 9
bit in the PKM was magically added!
Was I dreaming that? Didn't it work that way just a few years ago?
Dreaming, I'm afraid, Ed.
If storage protect
For a job, your key is the key you get control in which is the TCB key.
If you are authorized enough to get into supervisor state, once there you
can of course switch to any key. And the system will happily let you get
storage in that key, prior to the check for preventing user key csa,
Andy
Can anyone out there who are using ICC consoles tell me how they have the
console itself defined both in the consol member and hcd. This all worked
for us when we had a z8 hardware we are now on z9 but I don't see why
there
is a difference.
Here are some observations
V 1001,CONSOLE
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:21:11 -0400, Fletcher, Kevin wrote:
snip
I just XMITted a load module and it lost the AC(1) attribute.
snip
if it was M$, it would be a feature
More likely, if it was M$, it would have turned on AC(1).
--
Tom Marchant
Greg Shirey of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 07/27/2007 11:42:47 AM:
Yes, I got snubbed by a few of the same people as in Baltimore (and I
think they were snubbing each other) though I didn't get a sticker this
time.
I got snubbed by a fellow Lister whose
Peter Relson wrote:
Dreaming, I'm afraid, Ed.
If storage protect override exists on the machine, the PKM will start as
tcbkey+key9 and will be maintained that way.
If id does not exist, it would start as just tcbkey and stay that way.
I searched the archives to see if this had been
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 14:54 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
I guess Chris and I both had the same dream. Weird!
So you're asserting both you and Craddock are weird ???.
Can't see anyone arguing ... ;0)
Shane ...
(been away for a few days - must go back and see what this (thread) was
all about.)
D'oh - previous mail was supposed to go to Jaffe.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:27:56 +0200, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There appears to be a strong connection to Notify operators within
Netview/Automation. We have two operators defined that on the 'issuing'
system aren't necessarily logged on. Whenever they are logged on, the
message is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chris Mason
Herman
Alternatively the product may now be offered by a British
company in which case it could have been rebranded Favo*u*r.
But given the currently correct spelling of the product's name,
shouldn't
13 matches
Mail list logo
