-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wells
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 3:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OMVS
Also conflict with what is in
# Start the INET daemon for remote login activity
john..
the BPXparm has BPXROOT as superuser ...
does the etc/services have to be updated to point to telnet at a port??
right now it is 23...but the TN3270 is using that---per TCPparms for TCPIP
--
Email Disclaimer
This
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wells
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 3:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OMVS
John...
Below conflicts with something else that is there ..??
2023 stream tcp nowait
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:02:12 -0500, Chase, John
wrote:
Better late than never?
From: Michael Babcock
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:06:12 -0500
If I remember correctly, you must have
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wells
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 3:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OMVS
john..
the BPXparm has BPXROOT as superuser ...
does the etc/services have to be
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:33:34 -0400, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
SYS1.SCUNIMG is only needed if you expect DB2 to load its default
unicode image without having to build and load it at ipl time
It's been a
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:51:43 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And there was Amdahl's Huron, a rule-driven database. I ended up teaching
an internal class on it at Amdahl when the regular instructor fell ill. It
was quite interesting, in both good ways and bad ways. It also never took
off
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wells
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 4:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OMVS
So I changed all that had the omvskern to bpxroot..
2023 stream tcp nowait BPXROOT
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:51:43 -0700 said:
Amdahl had its own Unix called UTS. I think it was well regarded, but
never really took off. Did another company take it over when Amdahl was
acquired?
UTS is currently owned by UTSGlobal
http://www.utsglobal.com/Unix.html
from their website:
UTS
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 16:03:49 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:33:34 -0400, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
SYS1.SCUNIMG is only needed if you expect DB2 to load its default
unicode
have a good weekend---let ya know how it went.thanks again...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is
So I changed all that had the omvskern to bpxroot..
2023 stream tcp nowait BPXROOT /usr/sbin/otelnetd otelnetd -l -D
login
just put this inplace of the telnet one I commoneted out ??
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail
Hello list
We used to write our IMS SLDS logs, DB2 and MQ Series archive logs directly to
tape.
In order to get better tape utilization, we have converted these logs to disk
datasets, which are subsequently migrated to ML2(tape) by HSM.
Somewhat infrequently, we have found that HSM is so busy
I am not sure how it would work with same IP address to both z/OS stack and USS
TCP/IP stack. I have defined the same way here, except I have two VIPA
addresses.
My primary VIPA is TCP/IP on z/OS host and secondary vipa address is bind to
OMVS services. When you go to a line mode telnet and key
Mark Zelden wrote:
So if I opened a dos window on my win-doze system and wanted to use
telnet to get into z/OS UNIX (or used a telnet client), how would it know
where to go to?
Which server you get depends on entirely which host IP address you use
when you connect. That's the beauty of
My Ox is amongst the herd being gored. However...
Check out Google for
SLAVE OR SOVEREIGN.
STATUS OF THE AMERICAN CITIZEN.
[Synopsis of an address delivered by William Cowper Brann,
Editor Publisher Iconolast Waco Texas
August 10, 1895.]
Mr Brann was quite a racist by modern standards and a bit
Beauty indeed - one more beautiful aspect to the VIPA!
APAR PQ37421, SUPPORT TO ALLOW MULTIPLE DISSIMILAR SERVERS TO USE THE SAME
TCPPORT, closed date 2000-04-26, introduces the function and provides an
example - the example being - wouldn't you know it? - port 23 and TELNET:
quote
This new
John
If you want a regular telnet, like a normal UNIX would use, then you
need to pick a port that is not already in use.
Not true, can I will accept but not need. I guess I'm being picky!
See my post to Edward regarding another - and to my mind a *far* superior -
way.
Chris Mason
-
Edward
This same port sharing technique ought to work for any server, including
telnet.
If the APAR PQ37421 example is to be believed, you can remove ought to and
replace with does.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups:
Mark
Please see my post in reply to Edward's post which is his reply to this
post - if you can line up all the posts!
The specific answer to your question is that, in order to connect to the
traditional TCP/IP for MVS REXECD and RSHD services, you will use the IP
address of one of
Ron and John
I believe the story with etc/services is that it is used only as a last
resort when there has been no other customization which supplies the port
number that the server - or I guess a client - should use. Since you are
specifying port number 23 somewhere - I think, I haven't
Mark
Apart from the *genuine* opportunity for misunderstanding over the use of
USS here - a USS message, specifically USS message 10, is what you may very
well receive when you connect to what I believe Natarajan refers to as the
z/OS stack, meaning the Communications Server IP component
I, too, am 63 and lovin' it. Retirement is fantastic; Spent 43 years in the
large systems (mainframe) environment and still keep track of what is going
on - but don't have to worry about it anymore.
On 8/2/07, Lester, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM
William
With that Wikipedia article as an aide memoire, one is reminded that IBM
have indeed ported AIX to at least a predecessor to the zSeries.
I *think* what AIX/370 and AIX/ESA were was a quick fix to deal with, in
this case, a competition issue - it might simply have been a requirement
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:24:12 -0500, Ron Wells wrote:
In OMVS how can you send a control-c (SIGINT) to a foreground process?
(depending on terminal emulator) I use the mouse to copy the ESC
character from the lower left of the screen; paste it into the command
entry field; type 'c'; then ENTER.
On Aug 3, 2007, at 7:21 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
Transmission time from the earth to the moon might be a problem
however. :-)
Dr WHo got around the issue with no problem :)
Ed
--
Mark Jacobs
Technical Services
Time Customer Service - Tampa, FL
--
The secret of life is honesty and
I think it's a bit flood prone out at Birdsville.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shane
Sent: Friday, 3 August 2007 6:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Distance between primary and DR site
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 21:37
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
