"Knutson, Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
..
> Hi,
>
> An interesting APAR noted in SHARE session 2815 Real Storage Manager's
-
> Functional Evolution for Scalability and Performance. OA20749 is still
> open.
>
> Large Page Datasets APAR OA20749
>
> * OA20749
Bruce:
Somebody will jump in and correct me if I'm incorrect, I'm sure, but were
you aware that the Tivoli Enterprise Portal (TEP) license (and code) is
already included with any of the Tivoli OMEGAMON XE products, including the
no charge OMEGAMON XE Management Console for z/OS? I wasn't sure sinc
And to answer the other half of Magen Nargalit's question:
>If a c/c++ connector s required and I don't have c/c++ compiler
>for z/os can I compile on another platform and port the
>object / Module to z/os environment?
Yes, of course. You do not need the IBM C/C++ compiler installed in your
produc
Hi,
An interesting APAR noted in SHARE session 2815 Real Storage Manager's -
Functional Evolution for Scalability and Performance. OA20749 is still
open.
Large Page Datasets APAR OA20749
* OA20749 for z/OS V1.8 and V1.9 will remove the 4G limit for paging
datasets - The maximum size for a pagin
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/29/2008
at 03:15 PM, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>As far as the ISPF editor, the default is initial
>value 100 w/ increment 100;
That's what you get when you use ISPF to create a member, but ISPF can
also work with members created externally. Also, IS
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/01/2008
at 05:11 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I'm reminded of the PDP-6/10/20,
There was no PDP-20. As I recall the DECSYSTEM-20 used a KL10.
>where the registers were memory mapped, or the bottom 16 words of
>memory were register mapped, depend
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/29/2008
at 11:50 AM, Warren Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I'm sure I'm missing the line control character somehow but I'm just
>confused because its z/Linux to z/OS Unix, both on the mainframe
Linux uses ASCII, regardless of the hardware platform. To transfer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
02/29/2008
at 12:23 PM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I guess because I prefer "content" over "form".
I found that I had more control over form with DCF et al; the WYSIAYG
software showed me the current text layout instead of the markup and left
me guessi
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:43:09 -0600, Kenneth E Tomiak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>Do speakers over-estimate how popular their session will be? NO!
>...
Sure, some do. And others sometimes greatly underestimate a
suddenly very timely session based on poor past attendance. Both
happen all th
Those of you who belong to SHARE, an IBM large systems (some like to still
say manefraim - see session 2400 why that spelling might be correct) User
group, have one to two weeks to voice what type of topics you would like the
MVS SCP Project to host. I'll check your involvement with SHARE to wee
Thanks Ed. I try to separate fact from fiction. And then of course, there are
always opinions floating around based on neither.
I'm always looking for "users" to present on a topic of interest to SHARE, not
just MVS SCP.
--
For
There was a session at the SHARE Conference in Orlando that went into some
detail about LSPR and some changes and what is being measured and why. I
am working with the speaker to see what can be uploaded for the
proceedings. This was an unplanned session that we were able to squeeze
into a slot
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Every presentation I gave had a handout. And, every presentation I
attended had a handout.
Correction! There was no hand out for the Bit Bucket -- Friday @ 11 am.
That ad-hoc session is traditionally composed on-site, during the
conference, by the presenters. No SHARE-prov
They want to know. But there is no one answer that pleases everybody.
SHARE is a User Group. Adding a survey to a website takes somebody's time.
People's time costs money. SHARE is mostly about running a Conference for
the User community, not about how to increase profits for stockholders.
Dec
Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
[snip]
I don't know the best answer, certainly making attendees realize this is a
USER group conference and handouts are not part of the conference fee is
part of it.
Excellent post, Ken!
It's important to point out that it has *always* been the case that some
SHAR
I was quizzing a vendor who wrote the code for their product to use a zIIP
and was assured nothing special from IBM was required. Which meant anyone
could write enclave SRB code and set the bit requesting a zIIP engine and it
would be honored, providing a zIIP was available and not overloaded.
And that didn't work in college?
>One speaker actually suggested that the attendee might
>take notes on a pad of some sort (remember college?) and
>then download the presentation and transfer the notes to
>the presentation; rather than write the notes directly
>on the presentation handout, as was
In a message dated 3/2/2008 9:43:36 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Commenting/complaining to SHARE is worthwhile. I encourage the non-
complainers to write too. Surveys of only bad-mouthing responses does not
show how many happy people are out there. If 95% of the att
(This is tagged on Norman's post because I was on it when I deicded to add
my $20.00 worth.)
There are way too many posts on this subject for me to try and get all the
right information and separate out the wrong information. The problem begins
with attendees believing the handout was paid for
Try CEE.SCEEPROC
David Logan
Product Manager, Pitney Bowes Software
http://centrus.com
4750 Walnut St, Suite 200
Boulder, CO 80301
W: (720) 564-3056
C: (303) 818-8222
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS L
Library CBC.SCCNPRC.
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 01:53:48 -0600, Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Running ADCD z/OS 1.8. Not sure which member of ADCD.Z18.PROCLIB is the
C
>compiler procedure or if the compiler JCL is in another library altogether.
>
>TIA,
>Jerry]
--
21 matches
Mail list logo
