Others have provided some good answers to the short-term unsupported fix.
The supported fix is to get thee updated to Rational Enterprise Generation
Language (EGL). There are migration guides located here (scroll down to the
bottom):
On 28 Mar 2008 12:44:12 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Morris, Carey) wrote:
A few nights ago we started getting this message when we
tried to send emails from the mainframe to our Outlook
email server:
EZA5198I 03/25/08 23:25:23 2 550
Mark,
The total time of the outage from hang to CICS regions up an functional
was 34 minutes which I know is a local record (not one that I am anxious
to try and beat!). :-)
Not bad considering this LPAR had 22G of real storage. The SADUMP
performance with striping is amazing!
Can you provide a
John,
Does anybody know why the RNL cannot be updated immediately when I add a
new GENERIC queue name to it and there already exists some resources
using that queue name? I mean, I can understand it if IBM didn't want to
bother much with coordinating updates between multiple systems. What I
tried
Hélio,
MODEL BIND:01020271 4020 80000018 5018507F
MISMATCH BITS: 0038
1850 and 1850 look like screensizes
1850 is 24 rows, 80 columns
Apparently your terminal is configured as 3850 ( 56 rows, 80 columns ) and
One of IBM's originally stated reasons for moving to OCO was to
help stop overburdening support teams with PMRs for bugs that
were actually code that was poorly modified by customers. I don't
know if that was every actually much of a problem, but it certainly
would be now with IBM's reduced
Other than a problem situation (looping transaction etc.) does anyone
know of any shops where data is written so fast that the SMF address
space (writes to MANx) can't keep up as opposed to the offload process
not being able to keep up? Kees mentioned it and I have seen it
happen,
but
Is a DB2 Connect license included with the ADCD?
Didn't see that it was priced when I downloaded it.
--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you
Good Morning To All,
I am stuck trying to decipher the DEVTYPE X'' from the following
LISTCAT (posted below). The dsn is cataloged, and the VOLSERS are controlled
by a product ExHPDM. I have checked the manual Z/OS V1R7.0.DFSMS Access Method
Services for Catalogs, but it is not
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of willie bunter
Good Morning To All,
I am stuck trying to decipher the DEVTYPE X'' from
the following LISTCAT (posted below). The dsn is cataloged,
and the VOLSERS are controlled by a product
Barbara,
I worked for a software vendor and our average in problems were 80%
configuration/installation and about 20% real bugs in code.
Regards,
Scott
IDF
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Barbara Nitz
Sent: Monday, March 31,
Is there a way of finding out the DEVTYP of indirectly-cataloged datasets?
Could the good folks at SUN/STORAGETEK provide an answer if possible?
Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of willie bunter
Good Morning
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/28/2008
at 09:44 AM, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The catalog has nothing to do with it. Despite the fact that someone
deleted the data set, it is still ALLOCATED to JES2 and the original
extents are in the DEB. You can rename the new one, re-allocate it
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/28/2008
at 11:32 AM, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The only way to get this correct is to reallocate the proclib back on the
original volume in the original location
No. You must close the concatenation before you delete the data set and
there is no
Hi Everyone,
We have an issue with our syslog. The command was issued to stop the syslog
to write it out. Normally a new syslog is created. Unfortunately this time
that didn't happen. We are now using the logger data set on this partition,
just the hard copy. Does anyone know how to get a new
Barbara Nitz wrote:
The lack of source code prevents me (as a customer) from
finding out fast what might have gone wrong and how to find a
bypass. And software support has gone down quite dramatically
in quality, in my opinion.
My worst experience along those lines came with MVT. When IBM
Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We have an issue with our syslog. The command was issued to stop the syslog
to write it out. Normally a new syslog is created. Unfortunately this time
that didn't happen. We are now using the logger data set on this partition,
just the hard
Search defrag hsm in ibm-main
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Another [small] mainframe has bitten the dust.
Our MP3000 had been running OS/390 2.10 for the last few years but today
has been shutdown for good with the applications moved off mostly onto
UNIX platforms. Back in 1999 when we were outsourced the mainframe was
going within 2 years. Well, over 8
Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We have an issue with our syslog. The command was issued to stop the syslog
to write it out. Normally a new syslog is created. Unfortunately this time
that didn't happen. We are now using the logger data set on this partition,
just the hard
W START possibly.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SYSLOG problem
Hi Everyone,
We have an issue with our syslog. The command
WRITELOG START perhaps???
See
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2G133/4.58.1?S
HELF=EZ2CMZ34DT=20031016134357
What command was issued to cause the problem in the first place? What
console messages did you get?
Regards,
Ulrich Krueger
-Original Message-
From:
Mary,
Look at the WRITELOG command in MVS to force the syslog to spool and start
another one.
To have the hardcopy message set recorded on the system log, enter:
V SYSLOG,HARDCPY
This should be all you need.
Lizette
Hi Everyone,
We have an issue with our syslog. The command was
Anyone able to send from AS400--Commands to JES2??
Trying to get Commands sent from AS400 to JES2only see reference to
sending JCL...
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the
Hey Mary,
Try command 'W START'
Jerry
Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
03/31/2008 01:04 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
SYSLOG problem
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 3:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSDF Command Line
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
It ain't that easy. I've selected / Command line at bottom
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:20:32 -0500, Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We have an issue with our syslog. The command was issued to stop the syslog
to write it out. Normally a new syslog is created. Unfortunately this time
that didn't happen. We are now using the
Thanks for the help, we got it.
Mary
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SYSLOG problem
Hi Everyone,
We have an issue with our
Martin,
I'm sorry to hear you shut your MP3000 down for good. We had the same thing at
PH Mining about 2 years ago, also an MP3000. I'm glad that you could keep
your job. The MP3000 isn't much use anymore, since it won't run z/OS in 64 bit
mode. I at least got to run z/OS in 31 bit mode
I have the following JCL coded and being submitted to M/F ,job runs but
command not being issued when I view syslog...Not understanding why..
Tried from TSO(submit) and through AS400(NJE)
No errors just the fact that dummy job did run ok...
//X23TEST JOB (),'TEST COMMAND',MSGCLASS=X,
//
Doing my first every install of CICS under z/OS. I'm confused by some
parameters in the dialog.
WUI - create a WUI CICSplex?
WUI?
This is a single z/OS system, there will not be multiple CICS(s) running.
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
Please follow the instructions at the bottom of each message. They are
quite clear I believe.
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:26:18 +0200, Ilza Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I was able to test sadump on a 6GB real lpar, and the outage time
from IPLing sadump to IPLing MVS again was less than 10 minutes
(dsntype=large to two volumes):
8:18:50 IPL sadump
8:21:29 AMD095I VIRTUAL DUMP 15% COMPLETED. TOTAL MEGABYTES
DUMPED: 8:25:02 End of sadump
8:28:08
We sent JCL from a AS400 to a mainframe using RJE connection ran it and
sent the output back to the AS400. or you could FTP from the AS400 to JES
on the mainframe. Depends if you want something back from the mainframe.
Michael Saraco
Systems Consultant
Baer Consulting, Inc.
Work - 507-526-2566
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another one bites the dust.
Martin,
I'm sorry to hear you shut your MP3000 down for good. We had the
I have not received any emails since Sunday, is anyone else having the same
problem?
Thanks
Oscar
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
It's working better now.
- Original Message -
From: Oscar H Flores [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 6:10 PM
Subject: No Emails
I have not received any emails since Sunday, is anyone else having the same
Hello all, I was wondering if anyone new of a good manual that would
help in tuning vtam buffers under z/os 1.7 I have looked at SC31-8777
and this gives some information, but I was wondering if there was a
redbook(I have searched redbooks and couldn't find one) or some other
paper available that
I also haven't seen any messages since Sunday, but not just for TSO-REXX but
also for IBM-MAIN as well. I'll CC this message to IBM-MAIN to see if anyone
there knows what's going on. I'll also CC it to you (Oscar) individually,
because if you're not seeing messages on the listserv then you
WUI - Web User Interface. It talks to CMAS.
Daniel Allen | Senior Systems Programmer | 1-800-457-3736x11241
Serena Software - The Mashups Are Coming
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008
I know we've been down this road before. Here is more fuel for the fire.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8Tsqk6jJoY
blocked::http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8Tsqk6jJoY
Gary Green
EverGreen Systems
I can use all the help I can get with my fight against cancer! Please
support my efforts!
It's pointed to by field ECVTCTBL in the ECVT.
ECVTCTBL DCV(CSRCTABL) Customer anchor table.
* Slots assigned by IBM.
* Ownership: Callable Services.
*
Okay, we know what it is.
Who owns (owned) it.
I think that was the intent.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:02:50
To:IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another one bites the dust.
It's
Okay, we know what it is.
Who owns (owned) it.
I think that was the intent.
--Original Message--
From: Mark Jacobs
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
ReplyTo: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Sent: Mar 31, 2008 20:02
Subject: Re: Another one bites the
IBM assigned slots in the table to anyone who requested one. What the
requestor did with the slot was totally up to them.
If you are asking who in IBM did the assigning I don't remember the name
or contact information.
Mark Jacobs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Does anyone have comments about CA VTAPE? I did some archive searches
and got some hits from 2005. I was wondering if there are any more recent
experiences. I am probably most curious about CPU consumption. One of the
2005 post talked about a 15% hit on a Z890. There was a response to turn
Tom,
Quite a bit has been done with CA-Vtape since 2005 to help reduce CPU
utilization. In particular CA-Vtape will exploit a zIIP (if available of
course). And yes, if a zIIP is not available then compression will be done
using main CPU cycles; so then you have to balance the need for a
Cross-posted for the readers of IBMVM, Linux-390 and IBMMAIN.
The next Linux on System z Live Virtual Class (LVC) is planned for
Wednesday, April 2nd 11:00 AM EDT.
There is no charge to participate in this technical education session.
Title: Problem Determination with Linux on System z
I was just now looking at this thread and didn't see where anybody mentioned
the SDCs (Service Definition Coefficients). It seems like people were
comparing duration as if they meant the same thing in every location.
That's not so. A duration of 100, 1000, or 1 could mean the same amount
of
Breaking a long drought on the Wiki I added the following articles:
- How do I write to an HFS file from CICS?
http://cicswiki.org/cicswiki1/index.php?title=How_do_I_write_to_an_HFS_file_from_CICS?
- How do I authenticate a web user in CICS?
No zIIP's. So what kind of a number are we talking?
-- Original message --
From: Russell Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom,
Quite a bit has been done with CA-Vtape since 2005 to help reduce CPU
utilization. In particular CA-Vtape will exploit a zIIP (if available of
Slots in the customer anchor table are assigned, as Steve Thompson mentioned,
by IBM to customers, generally ISV's, as a way to allow ISV's an anchor point
for common storage areas without having to incur the overhead of adding a
subsystem definition, or of using a system wide name/token pair.
I've seen earlier items about Healthchecker and its ESQA checking, but I
have a general question to which I haven't been able to find the
information in the manuals.
Given that ESQA will just overflow into ECSA is there any real reason
not to allocate ESQA fairly low so that it is always
I will be happy if someone will review my product using this forum or any other
forum (like zjournal.com).
Just take a look what features this product gives without paying millions of
dollars. With these features I am sure that MVS users will like to know if this
product can be use after
55 matches
Mail list logo
