I am out of the office until 12/11/2008.
Teaching class at customer site. Checking Notes nightly.
If urgent, try 303 550-8123.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 4
Dec 2008 to 5 Dec 2008 (#2008-340) sent on 12/5/08 22:10:36.
This is the only notification
Yup. I just ran a test and it worked just as you predicted. The
no-longer-defined LNKLST set no longer appears in the list. UNDEFINE
likely frees the storage occupied by the control blocks as well...
Exactly. UNDEFINE'ing a LNKLST set results in clean-up.
Otherwise, LNKLST sets remain around and
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 23:17:30 -0600, John McKown wrote:
Well, it looks like the company that I work for is really going to try to
get off of the z. As I understand it, they have reputable people telling
them that an iSeries can do the work for about 1/2 the cost. The z
software cost is simply
John,
I'm sorry to hear about that. As I've posted on this list before, I went
through the same thing from 2004 to 2006. PH Mining got rid of their MP3000,
and replaced it with RS6000's. Those are i series, right? Everything runs on
SAP in a different state. They seem to be happy with it.
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
I'm sorry to hear about that. As I've posted on this list before, I went through
the same thing from 2004 to 2006. PH Mining got rid of their MP3000, and
replaced it with RS6000's. Those are i series, right?
No. That's System p.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
WE are getting a Z10 BC. Will ZOS 1.7 run ubder this system and if so what
toleration maintenance will I need
**Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and
favorite sites in one place. Try it now.
RS6000's. Those are i series, right?
No. That's System p.
I believe iSeries were AS/400's.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'd think so, wouldn't you? However, we are converting from one Report
Archiving and Distribution system (vendor unnamed due to fear) to
another. We were going to directly read the files containing the reports.
We were told if we developed such a program we would be sued by the
vendor.
SVC 12 loop used to be the easiest way to crash a system
SQA exhaustion? GO ATTACH EP=GO worked pretty well too, back in the
day.
The old RABBIT proc did pretty well at plugging up JES2, even though
it didn't crash the system directly.
--
Rick
--
Remember that if you're not the lead
Hi,
Thanks for the replies. Our main concern is whether we will face a performance
degradation for our current zIIP-eligible workload (that are currently running
on multiple CPs) when we make 1 single zIIP processor available for LPAR.
Here the main question is; if zIIP processor is fully
I know of a shop planning to dump AS/400's for Micro$oft and .net
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 8:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: another one biting the dust?
On 12/6/2008 at 10:01 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
If it's a matter of software cost, how does Linux on z compare?
Of course, the OS is cheaper, but do vendors of applications and
support for the OS still see it as a z and charge z-like prices?
I can't speak for all
As someone else said, it depends.
By default, if you have a zIIP configured and online, non-zIIP processors
will do zIIP work if the zIIP processor asks for help, which it will do
when it thinks it is necessary (which happens before it is 100% utilized).
Work will then be processed by normal
Eric,
I read recently on an IBM site about a subscription offering from IBM where you
pay them and every month they send you any new fixes developed for the z10.
They said to check with you marketing rep to find out the cost. I don't
remember what this was called though.
We are in the
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:00:15 -0600, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most recent SHARE presentation is in the proceedings here
http://ew.share.org/proceedingmod/abstract.cfm?abstract_id=18210
3054 - DFSMS Basics: Storage Reporting (San Jose Summer 2008)
Mike Wood RMM Development
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 19:52:47 -0500, Jim Mulder wrote:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on
12/04/2008
07:15:08 PM:
We recently had a power problem on our z10
Am I asking too much?
Yes, because MVS does not have the information you desire. We don't
We just finished installing a shiny new green-stripe z10 BC at our LA
headquarters. Things went very smoothly. It's a slick new machine, that
runs fast, with a cool new HMC user interface to which I'm quickly
adapting.
When I arrived on-site at around 11:30 AM, I couldn't understand why
Depends on how you define performance degradation. Think I indicated this
already.
There is overhead to run work on zIIPs. The CPUtime for transactions/work
will go up.
But it is possible that your throughput (number of transaction processed)
can increase.
Especially if you have the right work
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
I'm sorry to hear about that. As I've posted on this list before, I
went through the same thing from 2004 to 2006. PH Mining got rid of
their MP3000, and replaced it with RS6000's. Those are i series,
right?
No. That's
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I know of a shop planning to dump AS/400's for Micro$oft and .net
I would short their stock, depending on their size. But I'll admit a,
perhaps unreasonable, aversion to anything from M$.
--
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: Ein
No. iSeries, pSeries, xSeries, zSeries begat System i, System p,
System x, System z. Now that they've converged the i and p hardware,
IBM is playing games with i -- it's now just i, no System or
Series (stupid -- unsearchable!).
There was no tSeries; there are ThinkPads in various lines,
According to the z10 BC announcement you have to install something called the
IBM Lifecycle Extension for z/OS V1.7 (5637-A01) in order to run z/OS 1.7 in a
z10 BC.
This is a charged feature.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
WE are getting following message when edit some datasets. Pls help .
Regards
Initial edit macro set
Macro does not exist
Command === RE
IKJ56500I COMMAND RE NOT FOUND
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
The message says that it could not find the RE macro in sysproc
concatenation. Are you sure that you don't mean RES?
Itschak
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Philip Hitti [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
WE are getting following message when edit some datasets. Pls help .
Regards
Initial edit macro
There's a RE accidently left in the Initial Edit Field . Watch
carefully when you start the edit.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Itschak Mugzach
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 10:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 01:33:47 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually X is the blade server.
T was the think-pad (now Lenovo)
No
X series are Intel server not necessarily blades
I had to buy X3650 and x3950 etc ... (we did not want blades anymore)
they are multi processor boxes
26 matches
Mail list logo
