On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:06:39 -0500, Angel-Luis Dominguez wrote:
Have a look at FILE 501 from CBT.
It is a very simple and effective way to sync every machine, even PC's
obtaining directly time from mainframe.
There's a struggle here that's as much political as technical.
If your IT czar is a
Can you dump the current header?
You can then either compare it to a new one that you generate, or send me a
copy and I can see if I can see what needs to be changed.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I would like to draw your attention to the z/OS 1.11 announcement letter,
now available here:
http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/2/897/ENUS209-242/ENUS209-242.PDF
There's a lot to like, including the new z/OS Management Facility under
discussion in another thread. However, I am most excited
Don,
Prior to L8 TCBs, DB2 SQL requests executed on threads. Each thread was a
seperate TCB. So the QR TCB and each thread TCB could execute in parallel.
Terry Draper
zSeries Performance Consultant
w...@btopenworld.com
mobile: +966 556730876
--- On Wed, 19/8/09, Don Deese
Sorry to disagree but it is step initiation / allocation
that has been changed not IEFBR14.
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
I think the improvements Ulrich was talking about must be the new CSSMTP
server in z/OS v1r11.
More information in the z/OS v1r11 Comms Server IP Config Guide here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/F1A1B390/2.18.1?DT=20090330131407#HDRCSSMTP
Peter Hunkeler writes:
Sorry to disagree but it is step initiation / allocation
that has been changed not IEFBR14.
It was my attempt at humor, that's all.
But as a follow-up, if anyone has an idea how to do nothing even better,
please feel free to post.
z/OS Management Facility is showing up in IBM's pricing system now. Both
5655-S38 (license) and 5655-S39 (subscription and support) are listed at
zero dollars. (I just checked.)
Operators are standing by (along with Shopz).
Here are some more z/OS freebies available from IBM:
Dave
look here: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r11/index.jsp
Regards
Fabio
At 18.50 19/08/2009, you wrote:
They are not yet available via the Softcopy Librarian internet source.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original
In z/OS V1.11, when IEFBR14 is used with DD statements to delete a data set
that has been migrated by DFSMShsm, Allocation is now designed to pass the
delete request to DFSMShsm under most circumstances so the data set can be
deleted without first recalling it.
This has been discussed here,
The zAAP on zIIP support should not be construed to imply that zAAPs are
going away.
It was intended primarily for customers with small enough amounts of zAAP
and zIIP offload that it might not make sense to purchase both a zAAP and a
zIIP.
The support is not limited, however, only to that small
Edward Jaffe of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 08/17/2009 01:25:45 PM:
John P Kalinich wrote:
How about some Virtual SHARE Coverage reports from the fortunate that
get
to attend SHARE? The now defunct DoDIE SHARE project used to collect
and
publish session
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:35:45 -0400, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
The zAAP on zIIP support should not be construed to imply that zAAPs are
going away.
It was intended primarily for customers with small enough amounts of zAAP
and zIIP offload that it might not make sense to purchase both a
Have a spool offload dataset offload does not recognize format correctly...
error on header when using offload,type=receive..
I would create a new small offload (just a single output would suffice) on disk
to generate a valid header. Then, examine the two files closely to see
differences. Also
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:52:10 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
In z/OS V1.11, when IEFBR14 is used with DD statements to delete a data set
that has been migrated by DFSMShsm, Allocation is now designed to pass the
delete request to DFSMShsm under most circumstances so the data set can be
deleted
If it were up to me, I would have added a parm to the ALLOC member of
PARMLIB that would indicate whether or not if a dataset was migrated it
should be recalled for DELETE process only. This would be an LPAR wide
application, but it would be easier to support I think.
Something like
ALLOCXX
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:35:45 -0400, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
It was intended primarily for customers with small enough amounts of zAAP
and zIIP offload that it might not make sense to purchase both a zAAP and a
zIIP.
What about the opposite? Any plans to allow zIIP on zAAP?
It is not possible to have the Sysplex Timer (9037) attach to non-S/390 or
zSeries servers. However, there is a way that customers can get the same
time across both zSeries and non-zSeries servers in their data center. The
9037 can attach to an External Time Source (ETS), the options are described
Here is screen print of 1st record below...
From what I have been reading it--offload--reads first record (80) bytes
of the 4042blocked record...
.)=...AGFEI ..*.x..Q..
(...$
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Brian Westerman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 1:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: spool offload
Can you dump the current header?
You can then either compare it to a
Timothy Sipples wrote:
It was my attempt at humor, that's all.
Good! ;-D
But as a follow-up, if anyone has an idea how to do nothing even better,
please feel free to post.
Enhance IEFBR14 to follow standard linkage conventions as stated in z/OS
Principle of Operations. ;-D
It is a crying
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 6:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: zAAP on zIIP
The zAAP on zIIP support should not be construed to imply
that zAAPs are
John,
I don't think you understand zIIPs and zAAPs. There is NO hardware difference
between zIIPs, zAAPs, GPs or any other engine (IFL, ICF, SAP - have I left out
any?). The difference is the work marked for dispatch on them.
Jim Horne
Systems Programmer
Large Systems Engineering
However, by doing this, IBM has implicitly revealed that there cannot be
much, if any, difference between an zAAP and a zIIP, hardware-wise.
IBM has never hidden this fact. It has been discussed numerous times on this
list. A PU is a PU. Period. How else could they dynamically configure PUs for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Horne, Jim - James S
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: zAAP on zIIP
John,
I don't think you understand zIIPs and zAAPs. There is NO
tried the command ... file came down but one record only header 80bytes
and followed by hex'40'...?
ftp said -- completed--with all records I expected??
From:
McKown, John jmck...@healthmarkets.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
08/20/2009 08:06 AM
Subject:
Re: spool offload
Sent by:
IBM
z/OS has had it's own time server for quite some time now, no need to use the
CBT version.
Angel-Luis Dominguez angel_luis_dominguez_mar...@yahoo.es 8/20/2009 1:06
AM
Have a look at FILE 501 from CBT.
It is a very simple and effective way to sync every machine, even PC's
obtaining directly
Correction! The Service and Support is also priced at zero dollars.
John Eells wrote:
Knutson, Sam wrote:
I have had some side conversations with folks outside and inside IBM
because the announcement lists this as chargeable but it was understood
that entitlement was to be included with z/OS.
Bob Shannon pisze:
However, by doing this, IBM has implicitly revealed that there cannot be much,
if any, difference between an zAAP and a zIIP, hardware-wise.
IBM has never hidden this fact. It has been discussed numerous times on this
list. A PU is a PU. Period. How else could they
did another offload -- below is it's header
..0,A06AGF ã.*.Ø..Q..
Ö...ã...(...$
02F60022CFFCCC4440110053801D1040001E1011001400140015
2C0B193F106176006001061002C806784100067C96840686068D068B
From:
Colleen and the others who responded to my request,
Just as a wrap-up on this issue, it appears as though I needed to shut
off the auto backup on these datasets before they would go away. I
turned off the auto backup and my test datasets were deleted when they
expired. I ran a couple more tests
IBM always hide it on every presentation addressed to non-technical people
(read: mamangement).It causes a lot of effort for techies to clarify the
things our managers.
I'm not sure the technical implementation of specialty engines is something
that IBM should discuss with management. Did
header on good one below...
..0,A06AGF ã.*.Ø..Q..
Ö...ã...(...$
02F60022CFFCCC4440110053801D1040001E1011001400140015
2C0B193F106176006001061002C806784100067C96840686068D068B
bad one...
We have a 3490-A20 controller (ESCON) and 1 3490-B40 (IBM Certified for
maintenance) box that we no longer have need of, we were wondering if anyone
out there has need of them. We are researching what the market value may be,
and I thought if someone needs them we might be able save both sides
Hello :
I want to unsuscribe for IBM Mainframe Discussion list.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
T-Systems Iberia
IT/TC Operations / SL MSY Storage Support
Francesc Xavier Martínez Escudero
Autovia A2, km.585, 08760 Martorell
+34 93 7733351 (Tel.)
+34 93 7733176 (Fax)
+34 690886041 (Telèfon
Then you need to follow the instructions at the bottom of every email!
Martinez Escudero, Francisco Javier
franciscojavier.marti...@t-systems.es 8/20/2009 9:48 AM
Hello :
I want to unsuscribe for IBM Mainframe Discussion list.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
T-Systems Iberia
In a message dated 8/20/2009 9:03:59 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
franciscojavier.marti...@t-systems.es writes:
I want to unsuscribe for IBM Mainframe Discussion list.
Read the bottom three lines of any post.
--
For
And it appears that Neon Enterprise Software is exploiting that
similarity by somehow marking work, other than the standard IBM
work, to be dispatched to a zIIP or a zAAP via their new zPrime product.
Tom Kelman
Enterprise Capacity Planner
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
A member in SYS1.PROCLIB is started via operator command. When I insert
a JOB statement as the first record, the system executes the member as a
job (which allows me to use instream data, for example).
This works well for plain old console START commands, but when I
internally issue a START
John Eells wrote:
Lizette Koehler wrote:
If it were up to me, I would have added a parm to the ALLOC member of
PARMLIB that would indicate whether or not if a dataset was migrated it
should be recalled for DELETE process only. This would be an LPAR wide
application, but it would be easier to
On 20 Aug 2009 06:08:10 -0700, elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za (Elardus
Engelbrecht) wrote:
It is a crying shame that IEFBR14 does not follow the linkage conventions.
It is the ONLY PRODUCTION module not following the proper linkage, ie not
using that SAVE and RETURN macros.
What about using
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:06:54 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Enhance IEFBR14 to follow standard linkage conventions as stated in z/OS
Principle of Operations. ;-D
The linkage conventions are not in the POO. They are in the Assembler
Services Guide, Chapter 2.
--
Tom Marchant
Will the new limit for JCL PARM= will be 110 characters? :-)
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Timothy Sipples e99...@jp.ibm.com wrote:
I would like to draw your attention to the z/OS 1.11 announcement letter,
now available here:
Hi
Mohammad,
I hope that the following (snipped from the CICS DB2 Guide) will
help:
snip
The CICS DB2 attachment facility includes a CICS DB2 task-related user exit,
DFHD2EX1, that is invoked when an application program makes an SQL request. It
manages the process of acquiring a thread
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:26:45 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
Thanks. I was under the impression that the microcode load in a
zAAP and a zIIP was different from the microcode load in a CP. I
guess that I was thinking that because there definately is a
difference (minor) in the microcode load in an
I see today that individual articles from the IBM journals now seem to be
available for $1.99 plus sales tax. That's a lot better than the $995 per
year subscription.
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
snip
I turned off the auto backup and my test datasets were deleted when they
expired.
unsnip
Rex, now you have me really mystified. I thought that the thread
indicated that you had HSM backup the DSNs (DCLASS, DSORG, etc) but they
wouldn't delete. Now it appears that you changed the
Tom Marchant wrote:
The linkage conventions are not in the POO. They are in the Assembler
Services Guide, Chapter 2.
Thanks. I forgot to mention this book.
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
In a message dated 8/20/2009 10:39:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com writes:
available for $1.99 plus sales tax. That's a lot better than the $995 per
year subscription.
Where's the bean counters when you need them? Cost about $6.70
to process an invoice. So
The linkage conventions are not in the POO. They are in the Assembler
Services Guide, Chapter 2.
Thanks. I forgot to mention this book.
A convention is not an architecture. Conventional linkage is not used for SVCs.
PCs use the linkage stack. Some C programs use XPLINK. Who knows (or cares)
See anything to cause error..??
see below on error I get..
$S OFFLOAD1,TYPE=RECEIVE
$HASP000 OK
IEF196I IEF237I 57B5 ALLOCATED TO SYS00014
$HASP121 OFF1.SR ERROR RECEIVING NETWORK JOB HEADER, RC=0
$HASP096 DISASTROUS ERROR AT SYMBOL SBFRCBER IN CSECT HASPSTAM
$HASP088 JES2 ABEND ANALYSIS
Jack,
Unfortunately timing was my enemy here. For the purpose of the test, I
set the mgmt class to 5 days. Initially I had created the datasets
(simple 3.4 allocate) without opening them. 5 days came and went, and
the datasets didn't go away. Being that I had never opened the
datasets, HSM
It can't bypass calling the module unless it performs all the functions that
IEFBR14 performs, meaning that the initiator must at least set its return code
variable to zero before not calling the module that does nothing.
Bill Fairchild
Software Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street *
--snip
ComputerWorld magazine has been a joke for many years now. It used to be
good back in the 80's/90's but MicroSoft's pocketbook is a big one. I
haven't bothered to read it for quite a long time now.
-snip--
The problem is in tightly defining information functions such as
server. And this is particularly a problem for us who are categorized
as being Mainframe people.
Looking for a particular technology for server functions (or
I posed a question a couple of months about HSM dump time elongating. Our
DASD geometry changed, so the number of devices changed. I followed what
HSM was actually doing so I thought that I would pass it along in case
anyone else would be interested. i hope that this isn't to convoluted, it
snip
That is very true. One side issue is that every once in a while there is
a program that *NOBODY* knows about and you have done your home work
researching where it might be called from. You cannot find any obvious
answer so
--snip
From the 1.11 announcement:
In Software Announcement 204-180, dated August 10, 2004, IBM announced its
intent to withdraw support for VSAM IMBED, REPLICATE, and KEYRANGE attributes
in a future release. Based on customer
Does it also tell you what program invoked the module?
Joel Wolpert
Performance and Capacity Planning consultant
WEBSITE: www.perfconsultant.com
- Original Message -
From: Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, August
---snip
Google is not very helpful.
1. What is the Mps to Ghz conversion for our mainframe - i.e. we have a
2094-S08 505 processor for mainframe applications that has 1,721 MIPS.
2. How many virtual Linux servers would a zO8 IFL support
Sysplex may have been conceived as a way for applications and systems
to grow beyond a box, but like it or not, it has evolved into a means to
merge independent systems together. Understanding the technical limitations
(we're closer to that now), each shop can decide how far to exploit it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: zAAP on zIIP
However, by doing this, IBM has implicitly revealed that
there cannot be
Sorry for the ignorance. What is an ELA (enterprise licensing agreement?)?
Why would this cause you to dismantle your sysplex?
Joel Wolpert
Performance and Capacity Planning consultant
WEBSITE: www.perfconsultant.com
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Gutowski aguto...@ford.com
Invoice? It looks like you can buy one online with some of that E-commerce
stuff.
BTW: Google's indexing bot can still read them for free :-)
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2009 10:39:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
---snip
Does it also tell you what program invoked the module?
unsnip--
Unfortunately, it does not tell you the identify of the invoker. Given
the nature and the mechanics involved, I
---snip--
I would like to draw your attention to the z/OS 1.11 announcement letter,
now available here:
http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/2/897/ENUS209-242/ENUS209-242.PDF
There's a lot to like, including the new z/OS Management
Thanks. I still see this as a useful tool.
Joel Wolpert
Performance and Capacity Planning consultant
WEBSITE: www.perfconsultant.com
- Original Message -
From: Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009
The only thing that has changed is that IBM has decided not to remove
KEYRANGE. IMBED and REPLICATE are still scheduled for removal
(eventually).
See:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/5cb5ed706d254a818625
But the millicode in an IFL is different from that in a CP is different from
that in an ICF (?) is different from that in a zAAP(?) is different from that
in a zIIP (?).
I was once told that one cannot IPL off an ICF (or maybe it was an IFL) because
NIP issues an instruction that is not
I was once told that one cannot IPL off an ICF (or maybe it was an IFL)
because NIP issues an instruction that is not supported on the specialty
engine. If that's true, then NIP is a special case.
ICFs load CFCC -- is that an IPL/NIP implementation?
IFLs allow the initialisation of z/VM --
Bob Shannon wrote:
I was once told that one cannot IPL off an ICF (or maybe it was an IFL) because
NIP issues an instruction that is not supported on the specialty engine. If
that's true, then NIP is a special case.
As I understand it, ONE useless IPL-time instruction program checks on
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:49:52 -0500, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbm1.com
wrote:
The only thing that has changed is that IBM has decided not to remove
KEYRANGE. IMBED and REPLICATE are still scheduled for removal
(eventually).
See:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 12:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: zAAP on zIIP
But the millicode in an IFL is different from that in a CP
is different from
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:57:43 -0500, McKown, John jmck...@healthmarkets.com
wrote:
snip
But there must be some way for the dispatcher to somehow know that CPU#n is
a zIIP or a zAAP as opposed to a general CP. Otherwise how would the
dispatcher know not to dispatch general work onto that CPU? I
McKown, John wrote:
But there must be some way for the dispatcher to somehow know that CPU#n is a zIIP or a zAAP as opposed to a
general CP. Otherwise how would the dispatcher know not to dispatch general work onto that CPU? I would guess
that there is something in the PCCA(?) that says this
The little thing is in LPA fer $#*()'sake, How much effort is there
to load it. How often is it not in an instruction cache line already
anyway ?
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Edward
Jaffeedja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
As I understand it, ONE useless IPL-time instruction program checks on an
IFL (and possibly other specialty engines). This conveniently prevents z/OS
from IPLing on a specialty engine.
I know one ISV that wanted
Doesn't work, get a Java something Unknown host error
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Fabio Massimo Ottaviani
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009
Staller, Allan wrote:
The only thing that has changed is that IBM has decided not to remove
KEYRANGE. IMBED and REPLICATE are still scheduled for removal
(eventually).
See:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/5cb5ed706d254a818625
AFAIR in the past there was a share scheduler software available.
Unfortunally I can't find it on the share website.
Anybody know of this?
Roland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Works for me.
Joel Wolpert
Performance and Capacity Planning consultant
WEBSITE: www.perfconsultant.com
- Original Message -
From: Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.11
On 8/20/2009 at 4:09 PM, Roland Schiradin rol...@schiradin.de wrote:
AFAIR in the past there was a share scheduler software available.
Unfortunally I can't find it on the share website.
Try http://www.share.org/Portals/0/Denver/Education/Agenda.exe
Mark Post
You need to logon to the SHARE.ORG website. Then go to
http://tinyurl.com/lwdbbr link
This s where the agenda scheduler is located.
Lizette
AFAIR in the past there was a share scheduler software available.
Unfortunally I can't find it on the share website.
Anybody know of this?
Roland Schiradin wrote:
AFAIR in the past there was a share scheduler software available.
Unfortunally I can't find it on the share website.
Anybody know of this?
snip
It led me a merry chase a few days ago, but I finally found it here:
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
See my original complaint below. Fabio's link works fine as a web
page. It does not for me as a source url for Softcopy Librarian 4.2j
It's typically awhile after the manuals make the Web before the source
for Softcopy
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:09:19 -0500, Roland Schiradin rol...@schiradin.de
wrote:
AFAIR in the past there was a share scheduler software available.
Unfortunally I can't find it on the share website.
Anybody know of this?
I had trouble finding it also. Don't know why it is not more visible.
Got it tnx to all. Wonder why it was so hidden for (only?) me
Roland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:24:40 -0400, John Eells ee...@us.ibm.com wrote:
John Eells wrote:
Lizette Koehler wrote:
If it were up to me, I would have added a parm to the ALLOC member of
PARMLIB that would indicate whether or not if a dataset was migrated it
should be recalled for DELETE process
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:38:03 -0400, John Eells ee...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Correction! The Service and Support is also priced at zero dollars.
...
But SEPARATELY priced at zero dollars.
Pat O'Keefe
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:42:52 -0400, Scott Rowe
scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
So, Denver is going to be my first real SHARE trip since 2000, who
else is going to be there?
...
Since my SHAREing days are over I humbly request you and/or
others to snub someone for me. I'd hate to think that SHARE
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Patrick O'Keefe patrick.oke...@wamu.netwrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:42:52 -0400, Scott Rowe
scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
So, Denver is going to be my first real SHARE trip since 2000, who
else is going to be there?
...
Since my SHAREing days are over I
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:35:32 -0500, Matthew Stitt wrote:
I actually like Lizette's solution far better than development. Her
solution is more functional and less specific. I know of many that use the
allocation routines for dataset work without using IEFBR14 (I for one). All
you need is to
Chris Craddock wrote:
Yeah, and since I started the whole snubbing thing, I'd appreciate it if
y'all would just snub each other on my behalf.
(I won't be there either)
But it was *great* to see you in Austin. We'll keep a seat at the dinner
table available for your next SHARE visit...
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Since the initiator doesn't know whether any program will
OPEN a data set or not, this can be made to work only if
all RECALLs are deferred until OPEN. This then means that
RECALLs will proceed consecutively rather than concurrently,
with attendant performance
Rick Fochtman wrote:
I know of a LLA exit written by Greg Price that can help
with module counts.
Thanks for the kind words, Rick. The LLA exit 1 concept is fairly
straightforward (Rob Scott also did it in MXI) but only covers
LLA-managed programs. To capture most program usage reliably
takes
95 matches
Mail list logo
