Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca wrote in message
news:mq7tc51ajbefs2n1tc5e769m2gb2aep...@4ax.com...
On 8 Oct 2009 14:08:24 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
snip
It could be done
much snippage
For those in IBM-MAIN who don't follow such things. Clark has had long
When it comes specifically to 64-bit COBOL, the biggest issue (IMHO) is
mixing of 31-(and/or 24-)bit COBOL with 64-bit COBOL.
It is my impression (and I do NOT speak for IBM) that IBM is aware of the
desire for 64-bit COBOL, but that (given the LE, not z/OS restriction on
mixed 31-/64-bit) code,
I am out of the office until 10/19/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return. Primarily working from home;
limited access to e-mail/phonemail. Call me at home (845-297-5196) or send
an e-mail if you need to get touch with me.
Note: This is an automated response to your message
I will be out of the office starting 10/09/2009 and will not return until
10/12/2009.
If you require immediate attention please contact Deb Hext (518) 257-4212,
Tony Alfonso (518) 257-4640 or Joyce Brooks (518) 257-4208 . You may also
contact my Team Lead, Sharon King (518) 257-4784 or my
All,
I currently try to find a obscure memory leak in one of our
applications. After some days our appl occupies ~17.000 pages of real
memory (needs just ~1.500 after startup).
As we track all malloc(), calloc(), realloc() and free() function calls,
I can say that there is no obvious
Michael,
Have you tried taking an in-flight dump (z/OS command : DUMP COMM=('foo') ) of
the address space and then running IPCS against it to see where the storage is
being used (VERBX VSMDATA and RSMDATA would be good place to start).
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street *
Ray,
I don't have an explanation for the panel, but this event raises an
interesting question. Do you leave you work station logged on and unlocked
when you leave the office at night such that someone else could use it to
access the network and email system under your ID and authority and with
Hi all,
After I defined the ARM policy and activiate it but nothing inside ? I
already defined the restart element in ARM policy. anything I missing?
SETXCF COUPLE,PCOUPLE=(SYS1.ARMCDS01),TYPE=ARM
IXC309I SETXCF COUPLE,PCOUPLE REQUEST FOR ARM WAS ACCEPTED
IEF196I IEF237I 982E ALLOCATED TO
In 4acb1a23.4010...@gmail.com, on 10/06/2009
at 06:21 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com said:
Does SimpList add this regex find
What he described is not a regex find, although it does borrow some
syntax.
Has anybody ported PCRE to z/OS?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In f62a8029ba9f4bf689c9e44f5f8eb...@afg, on 10/05/2009
at 08:53 AM, Andreas F. Geissbuehler afg0...@videotron.ca said:
Autocoder was/is the name of the 1401 Assembler:
c/the/a/
You're forgetting SPS; Autocoder required more hardware.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
In listserv%200910031526437940.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 10/03/2009
at 03:26 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
There's a smoldering need here for a means to pass arbitrary name/value
pairs from JCL to job processing components other than by steganographic
jobname coding.
SJF.
I recall having an email conversation with someone that was working on
porting the Hobbit (now Xymon) network systems monitor to z/OS. It has
a prereq for PCRE. I'll check with him to see if he got it working.
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 4acb1a23.4010...@gmail.com, on 10/06/2009
The help function in SDSF has always been somewhat byzantine...
I think they looked at it as: was it hard to code, it should be hard to use :)
Regards,
Thomas Berg
__
Thomas Berg Specialist IT-U SWEDBANK
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
The help function in SDSF has always been somewhat byzantine...
I think they looked at it as: was it hard to code, it should be hard to use
:)
I think they decided to use the OS/2 model of only having online documentation.
There is an old user's guide from years ago that is helpful but no
Have you tried taking an in-flight dump (z/OS command : DUMP COMM=('foo') ) of the address space and then running IPCS against it to see where the storage is being used (VERBX VSMDATA and RSMDATA would be good place to start).
I've never used IPCS :-( But I'm afraid in this case I have to use
Here is example of what is possible as far as generating 64 z9/z10
instructions, extended HFP, BFP, and DFP floating point, and 31 digit packed
and zoned decimal. With NOTRUNC, a 64 bit add for 1 byte literals can be
done with single AGSI instruction as shown below. The use of 64 bit
If you are leaking in the C program (I am assuming it is LE) then you might see
just some large chunks allocated to the heap (subpool 2 maybenot sure). If
that is the case then maybe the VERBX LEDATA IPCS command will help (IIRC you
will have to provide the TCB address). Disclaimer : I am a
There needs to be an expectation level set here:
64 bit addressing does not equal 64 bit arithmetic.
You can use the 64 bit arithmetic instructions WITHOUT using 64 bit addressing.
Our product does it all of the time. You just need to be running on the
correct architecture to use the 64 bit
EXACTLY. That was why I asked the question in the first place. It is a
matter of using the all facilities that are available, and 64-bit
arithmetic instructions are just one of the z/Architecture instruction
enhancements that COBOL/PL1 generated code could use without any problem
in a 31-bit
At last!
Lloyd Fuller has made the crucial point. It should, but probably will not, put
an end to this jejune discussion.
There is no real connection between AMODE(64) and 64-bit arithmetic operations.
IBM Enterprise COBOL could support, say, 64-bit/doubleword signed binary
integer
I am researching IP print solutions, to replace some quite old impact line
printers, and I recently stumbled upon the manual for NPF while working on our
z/OS 1.11 install. I don't recall ever reading or hearing about this before.
At
first glance it appears to be a way to drive LPD printers
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:33:01 -0700, Lloyd Fuller wrote:
There needs to be an expectation level set here:
64 bit addressing does not equal 64 bit arithmetic.
You can use the 64 bit arithmetic instructions WITHOUT using
64 bit addressing. Our product does it all of the time. You just
need to
Small correction: Cobol calls it reference modification. A
substring by another name...
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:15 AM, john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com wrote:
At last!
SNIP
These things said, it must also be conceded that the important new features
that IBM has added to Enterprise
In a message dated 10/9/2009 8:27:45 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
dmit...@shazam.net writes:
although it seems to have been around for quite some time. If anyone
could
share info on NPF with me I would greatly appreciate it.
Think most of this was beaten down a few years ago and is
If you use dest:IPxxx.yyy.xx.nnn what type of software or device do you
need at the other end?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re:
Hi
One of our customer insists to create dynamically, from a C++
application , several 1000 small files.
Any method to speed up this allocation ?
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems Gmbh
tel: (+43) 2236 27551 570
Fax: (+43) 2236 21081
E-mail:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of john gilmore
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit binary arithmetic
instructions?
At last!
Lloyd Fuller
In a message dated 10/9/2009 9:22:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
mw...@ssfcu.org writes:
If you use dest:IPxxx.yyy.xx.nnn what type of software or device do you
need at the other end?
For line mode data nothing extra. Modern print engines are highly
customizable and queue names are
Hi
We are also around dynalloc from C/C++, but
You are saying 17000 pages , but the used storage also high ?
(RPTSTG(ON))
So is it a reall a memory leak (HEAPC(ON,0,0,20)) or just a high real
storage usage ?
The LE runtime HEAPOOL(ALIGN) can make big differences .
Michael Knigge wrote:
Dana,
That's probably because, being IP, it is usually discussed on TCPIP-L.
However, back to your question.
It comes as part of the base so costs nothing and does what it says on the
tin. It has a JES component that takes batch output off the spool (via FSS)
and writes it to datasets. It has
So you're saying that a windows network printer can receive the data an
print it?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Experience with NPF
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:52:00 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
There's a smoldering need here for a means to pass arbitrary name/value
pairs from JCL to job processing components other than by steganographic
jobname coding.
SJF. Unfortunately, IBM has only documented its use for DD and
We are also around dynalloc from C/C++, but
You are saying 17000 pages , but the used storage also high ?
(RPTSTG(ON))
So is it a reall a memory leak (HEAPC(ON,0,0,20)) or just a high real
storage usage ?
The LE runtime HEAPOOL(ALIGN) can make big differences .
I'll give this a try
In a message dated 10/9/2009 9:43:19 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
mw...@ssfcu.org writes:
So you're saying that a windows network printer can receive the data an
print it?
Lots of 'properly configured' presumptions but yes in general.
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
One of our customer insists to create dynamically, from a C++
application , several 1000 small files.
Any method to speed up this allocation ?
If it helped DB2, it should help you. Add this to DIAGxx:
Vsm UseZosV1R9Rules(NO) /* Use faster GETMAIN/FREEMAIN*/
--
On 9 Oct 2009 01:35:23 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
All,
I currently try to find a obscure memory leak in one of our
applications. After some days our appl occupies ~17.000 pages of real
memory (needs just ~1.500 after startup).
As we track all malloc(), calloc(), realloc()
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 10:32 -0400, a.watthey wrote:
If you want to do data transforms then you will need to get Infoprint which
costs money. The two products are quite similar in many respects.
Extensive data transforms can be accomplished in an Input Record Exit -
I did one of those back in
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:31:19 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
I wouldn't go that far. Is DFP really going to perform better than
packed-decimal? Floating point of any kind has always been a large CPU
consumer, and somehow I doubt that either BFP or DFP are going to change
that pattern. ...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 07:57:38 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
One of our customer insists to create dynamically, from a C++
application , several 1000 small files.
Any method to speed up this allocation ?
If it helped DB2, it should help you. Add this to DIAGxx:
Vsm
Obviously, no potential ARM users (products) have been set up to utilize
Automatic Restart Management. The Automatic part is Restart, not
joining the fray.
Hope that helps.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After I defined the ARM policy and
The government idiots should be looking at MicroSoft, not IBM. Oh wait, who
did MicroSoft support in the last USA election?
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
IBM Mainframes Draw Antitrust Scrutiny
Trade group says it's been contacted by investigators seeking
Hi
I agree, but they insist to use unique seq files.
No PDS no VSAM no Unix HFS
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 07:57:38 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
One of our customer insists to create dynamically, from a C++
application , several 1000 small
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:19:02 +0200, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
I agree, but they insist to use unique seq files.
No PDS no VSAM no Unix HFS
Cap their resource use.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi
I'm trying this out, we had the DEFAULT YES, but I don't see any
performance difference till now
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
One of our customer insists to create dynamically, from a C++
application , several 1000 small files.
Any method to speed up this allocation
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:10:17 EDT, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
suffice or from JCL 'DEST:IP=xxx.yyy.xx.'.
Ed,
What else needs to be setup to get this to work? I ran a job with that and
the output is sitting in the output queue with DEST IP.The only
reference I can find to
Lots of good performance improvement comments snipped
One more time,
Have you created either a SHARE requirement or a marketing REQUEST for any
of the specific compiler changes to get performance improvements in
Enterprise COBOL (specifically those using higher ALS instructions)?
If not, why
Tommy
Back in 2001 I researched the use of ARM as a complement to the VIPARANGE
flavour of dynamic VIPA.
As Guy just about hinted, there is both an ARM policy and ARM-using address
spaces. In order to support programs which were not, as it were, ARM-
enabled I created some utilities to perform
That was what happened to me also.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Dana
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Experience with NPF
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:10:17 EDT, Ed Finnell
I am not sure if yours is the same situation, but we have to be able to use
printer netnames as destids and
In order to do this a JES $ADD command has to be issued to associate the name
with the actual DESTID that was
Defined for the device.
$ADD DESTID(IPM),DEST=U
Associates IPM
Yeah, sorry, as Chris Mason pointed out it's called Automatic Recovery
Management, not Automatic Restart Manager. Same idea though. An
application has to have the capability for ARM and then be defined to ARM.
I've never used it for much myself since most automation packages provide
much of the
Miklos Szigetvari miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com wrote in
message news:4acf4719.8070...@isis-papyrus.com...
Hi
One of our customer insists to create dynamically, from a C++
application , several 1000 small files.
Any method to speed up this allocation ?
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Ok, it's Friday. ARM = Automatic Restart Management. Applications
or products must have the capability of registering for ARM coverage.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Guy Gardoit ggard...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, sorry, as Chris Mason pointed out it's called Automatic Recovery
Management,
I have had the IEFACTRT exit in my test LPAR for sometime now and I see
today that it's not executing.
When I issue: D PROG,EXIT,EN=SYS.IEFACTRT,DIAG
I get:
CSV464I 11.25.36 PROG,EXIT DISPLAY 116
EXIT SYS.IEFACTRT
MODULESTATE EPADDRLOADPTLENGTHJOB
IEFACTRTA 85303000
Guy
Thanks for the correction. Actually it's a correction to my 8-year old
document. I just didn't bother to check this time around - nor, it would
appear, ever since I wrote it! I hope my customer forgave me - if one of the
later system programmers ever bothered to read it!
Maybe I should
Does anyone have any estimates (guesses) as to what performance gains
would result from generating 64-bit grande arithmetic instructions?
If it is significant, it would seem to me to be an opportunity for
some software vendor to have a tool that reads ADATA and assembler
output and generates
Did you tell smf to use it? in your SMFPRMxx
DDCONS(NO)
SYS(NOTYPE(4,5,19,20,34,35,40,99),INTERVAL(SMF,SYNC),
EXITS(IEFACTRT,IEFUJI,IEFUJV,IEFUSI,IEFU83,IEFU84,IEFUTL))
SUBSYS(STC,EXITS(IEFACTRT,IEFUJI,IEFUSI,IEFU83,IEFUTL))
A number of people have contacted me off-list with questions about the FEX
command, so this email will hopefully clarify some points.
First, FEX is going to be part of the next SimpList release (i.e. version 2.1).
It is deeply imbedded in the SimpList libraries (e.g. uses SimpList panel and
Ok, I've had time to research my memory banks. This probably has nothing
to do with the OPs original question but just for the record, there is a
subtle difference between RESET NORMAL and RESET CLEAR that has to with more
that just clearing storage.
It has to do with the FDRPAS program. FDRPAS
Wrong equations :-)
What is the *business case* for adding better optimizations to the
COBOL compiler?
Back in the day when there was fierce PCM competition, you could add
new instructions and then spend money in compiler exploitation as a
competitive advantage. Now the business case is a
Here's my SMFPRMXX statements:
SYS(NOTYPE(16,19,20,34,35,42,120:127,129:143,
145:244,246:252),
EXITS(IEFU83,IEFU84,IEFACTRT,
IEFUSI,IEFUJI,IEFU29),NOINTERVAL,NODETAIL)
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
Wrong equations :-)
What is the *business case* for adding better optimizations to the
COBOL compiler?
Back in the day when there was fierce PCM competition, you could add
new instructions and then spend money in compiler
In a message dated 10/9/2009 11:16:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
dmit...@shazam.net writes:
DEST=. Not a word about this in JES2 books...
Sorry it's in the IP Printway guide. I'll get a reference in a minute.
--
The loadpt value of means the module was found in LPA.
Issue
D PROG,LPA,MODNAME=iefactrt
This is the response I received on my test system.
14.50.31 CSV550I 14.50.31 LPA DISPLAY 992
FLAGS MODULEENTRY PT LOAD PT LENGTHDIAG
P IEFACTRT 87520DE0 07520DE0 0220
To add even more topic-skew, no mention of a full blown COBOL port to
zLinux with ahem.. CICS.
JC
= On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
= Wrong equations :-)
= What is the *business case* for adding better optimizations to the
= COBOL compiler?
=
= Back in the
Haven't seen a formal notice but got back from lunch with some of the
DBA's and they were gnashing about having to go in Sat night and Sunday
morning to baby sit a UPS upgrade. Supposedly a lights out power down will be
required. It may be short or it could be intermittent for a while until
Mark Thomen withdrew from the list some time ago, IIRC, due to health
issues.
Does anyone know his current status? He was a very welcome and
knowledgeable contributor, as well as a friend to all.
Rick
--
For IBM-MAIN
Rick Fochtman of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 10/09/2009 02:18:53 PM:
Mark Thomen withdrew from the list some time ago, IIRC, due to health
issues.
Does anyone know his current status? He was a very welcome and
knowledgeable contributor, as well as a friend
_4.4.1 z/OS V1R8.0 Infoprint Server User's Guide IBM Library Server_
(http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/aopv0331/4.4.1?ACTIO
N=MATCHESREQUEST=DESTTYPE=FUZZYSHELF=AOPBK363DT=20071022150028CASE=sea
rchTopic=TOPICsearchText=TEXTsearchIndex=INDEXrank=RANKScrollTOP=FIRSTHI
for those who care about such things, I just received thin in my inbox
Dear ...,
There will be a 15 hour outage beginning Saturday October 24 at 9:00 AM
MDT
until October 24 at 11:59 PM MDT. During this time, ShopzSeries will be
unavailable.
In support of IBM network
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of David Andrews
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 9:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: COBOL is an obvious cash cow to be milked to death was
Re:
Does Ent. COBOL 4.1 generate 64-bit
The last I heard, Mark will not be back on IBM-MAIN. I appreciated his comments
too (at least some of them :-) ).
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
D PROG,LPA,MODNAME=IEFACTRT
CSV550I 13.29.30 LPA DISPLAY 152
FLAGS MODULEENTRY PT LOAD PT LENGTHDIAG
P IEFACTRT 85303000 05303000 1EE0 16E14060
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315
According to the CSR464I message it states:
LOADPT loadpt
The load point address of the exit routine module. The value is only
valid when the exit routine is active.
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Pinnacle wrote:
Did they give you the WAD here?
No WAD yet...
Just had a close call with this. The support person suggested that,
because the documentation doesn't explicitly state that OUTFILE can be
sysout, it need not be supported and that any update should be
It is in th LPALIB and I did a re-ipl with CLPA and still no output from
the IEFACTRT in my jobs.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS
In 52bc4b80910090814x5ad52c8cua18e88d140c6d...@mail.gmail.com, on
10/09/2009
at 08:14 AM, Guy Gardoit ggard...@gmail.com said:
The government idiots should be looking at MicroSoft, not IBM.
They should be looking at both. But I agree that ms is the worse offender.
--
Shmuel (Seymour
Meanwhile, IBM spends considerable effort in optimizing its C/C++
compilers. Customers with C and C++ applications have more alternatives
to Big Iron.
Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of David
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:03:30 EDT, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
Sorry it's in the IP Printway guide. I'll get a reference in a minute.
Thanks, I forgot to mention it, but that is what I was trying to avoid with
this
project, buying anything... ;-)
Dana
In listserv%200910090945570233.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 10/09/2009
at 09:45 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
FSVO arbitrary. This is the USERDATA parameter, isn't it?.
Userdata parameter of what?
There are vendors adding their own DD keywords via SJF; I don't know
whether they are
In c648d10634943c4891f7085d0dad806b579d6...@usmbx06.aafes.com, on
10/08/2009
at 10:07 AM, Elliot, David elli...@aafes.com said:
They'll be discovering steam next. Of course IBM is being unfair to its
competitors. That's what being dominant means.
No, that's not what it means.
--
In 67954f200910081418h3f651d01qf2ecacd40da6d...@mail.gmail.com, on
10/08/2009
at 05:18 PM, P S zosw...@gmail.com said:
Sure, but FLEX-ES was fallout from PSI.
That has nothing to do with whether IBM's licensing policies violated
antitrust laws. The fact remains that IBM refuses to license,
In 4ace5273.5020...@ync.net, on 10/08/2009
at 03:58 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said:
IIRC, none of IBM's competitors in the mainframe market offer a 64-bit
machine. What's unfair about providing something your competitors
don't??
Why are you beating your wife?
You're defending IBM
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:44:29 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
ETR Response
I'm not understanding the rationale that's being applied here. MVS
utility input and output files are device independent unless explicitly
stated otherwise. You might be too young to remember, but that's one of
the tenets that
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
That has nothing to do with whether IBM's licensing policies violated
antitrust laws. The fact
In a message dated 10/9/2009 4:08:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
dmit...@shazam.net writes:
Thanks, I forgot to mention it, but that is what I was trying to avoid
with this
project, buying anything... ;-)
I think it's bundled with PSF although with 4.1 they started pulling the
In a message dated 10/9/2009 3:54:15 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu writes:
It is in th LPALIB and I did a re-ipl with CLPA and still no output from
the IEFACTRT in my jobs.
Check the length or hist with PDS against a working one. Sounds like it
might have
On 9 Oct 2009 09:34:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Lots of good performance improvement comments snipped
One more time,
Have you created either a SHARE requirement or a marketing REQUEST for any
of the specific compiler changes to get performance improvements in
Enterprise COBOL
Did you try ISRDDN?
TSO ISRDDN
LPA
M IEFACTRT
Should give you a screen telling you that it is PLPA resident and in what
library in the LPA concatenation it was found in.
Did it find the one you expected?
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated
There is a function in ISRDDN in TSO that might be able to help.
On the command line issue LPA - a list of the LPA Libraries will pop up.
Then issue MEMBER IEFACTRT. See if the module is where you expect it.
Lizette
It is in th LPALIB and I did a re-ipl with CLPA and still no output from
Ed, (smile) I contend there isn't any mainframe skills shortage.
z/VM, z/OS, SDF/Cobol/CICS/ DB2 and anything else you can think of.
With all the mainframe folks out of work now you could fill every standing
mainframe job opening in the contry and then some.
Who was the wise guy yelling
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
That has nothing to do with whether IBM's licensing policies violated
antitrust laws. The fact remains that IBM refuses to license, e.g., z/OS,
on competitive systems.
Um. Doh?
Here's the response from the person that compiled PCRE on z/OS:
I did get Pcre working. From looking at the Pcre dir that I did the work in, I
had to start from scratch with just the C files and H files and created new
make files. I also had to manually create a config.h file, and inside that
Clark Morris wrote:
On 9 Oct 2009 01:35:23 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
If these are for QSAM data sets, does the C program do a FREEPOOL
(free the buffer pool) on CLOSE. For reasons I don't understand,
apparently CLOSE does not automatically free the buffers. I think the
As I remember things, and it has been a while, the FREEPOOL is not
automatically done because it is expensive to get rid of the buffer pool
if you are just closing the file to reopen it because then you have to
just get the buffers all over.
These days, it's not that expensive.
Clsoing and
I've always thought that a page fault in any operating system, including
z/OS, would generate an interrupt. The task requiring the missing page
would be put aside whilst RSM did the required I/O to the page datasets
(unless the page was already in memory - in expanded storage, or a
stolen
David Stephens wrote:
I've always thought that a page fault in any operating system, including
z/OS, would generate an interrupt. The task requiring the missing page
would be put aside whilst RSM did the required I/O to the page datasets
(unless the page was already in memory - in expanded
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
d...@longpelaexpertise.com.au (David Stephens) writes:
I've always thought that a page fault in any operating system,
including z/OS, would generate an
97 matches
Mail list logo
