Re: ipl of new system

2010-01-29 Thread Bill Planer
The parmlib statements in your LOADxx member are processed very early. The same is probably true if it is specified in master JCL. The system symbolics, like SYSR1, are not yet defined. The only indirect cataloging you can use is to volser **. I found this out the hard way, once. Bill

Re: Top Secret to RACF - Institution Defined Data

2010-01-29 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Looks like using the ACEE should work. Thanks for the idea! As for that other stuff, I am just an applications person. THe Security guy is the one who needs to worry about the whole conversion thing. In fact, it's not just Top Secret to RACF. It's Top Secret on VSE to RACF on z/OS! But I'm

Re: Top Secret to RACF - Institution Defined Data

2010-01-29 Thread Frank Swarbrick
I'll take a look at that as well. Thanks. -- Frank Swarbrick Applications Architect - Mainframe Applications Development FirstBank Data Corporation - Lakewood, CO USA P: 303-235-1403 On 1/29/2010 at 11:57 AM, in message a3a2b85f1001291057p45c476a2u344b1e66dd488...@mail.gmail.com, Tony

Re: Extracting STDOUT data from USS

2010-01-29 Thread Greg Price
Paul Gilmartin wrote: Why re-invent the wheel? I always thought that this came about because CICS was a DOS app later ported to MVS. This CICS smarts for managing virtual tasks and not really OS waiting until there was absolutely nothing else to do meant that CICS apps got great throughput

The origins of CICS

2010-01-29 Thread john gilmore
Greg Price wrote: | Paul Gilmartin wrote: || Why re-invent the wheel? | I always thought that this came about because CICS | was a DOS app later ported to MVS. It was not. The three SE designers of CICS had reasonably but in the event very prematurely assumed that OS/MVT woluld be

<    1   2