Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-12 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
john_w_gilm...@msn.com (john gilmore) writes: None of this is altruistic, but neither is it reprehensible. It is business as usual. IBM has always repudiated the notion that it is an eleemosynary organization. recent post in a.f.c. http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2010j.html#34 Idiotic

Re: EDC5113I reason code = 053501B2 in/ /etc/utmpx

2010-06-12 Thread Mark Zelden
After we issued 'chmod 646 /etc/utmpx ' command and 'ls -l /etc/utmpx' comand , the /etc/utmpx attribution was shown now below: -rw-r--rw-- 1 BPXOINIT #SYSSTC 2288 Jun 10 21:42 /etc/utmpx we issued 'TSO OMVS' command again.Everything is normal. Doesn't your /etc/rc have this?

Re: IBM Rational Developer for System z

2010-06-12 Thread john gilmore
About my contention that IBM's increasing intrusiveness is not malicious, that it is instead a byproduct of its attempts at mainframe market segmentation, Tony Harminc writes: | I agree. Nonetheless I find the increasing intrusiveness | annoying and fear the inevitable second order

Re: SEASIK 1.0 released

2010-06-12 Thread Paul Edwards
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:48:18 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net wrote: On 6/9/2010 5:17 AM, Paul Edwards wrote: Don't look at me. IBM are the ones who created ftp with the RDW option, and I'm not the only user of that. You missed one crucial step - you zip the AWS file, and then ftp

Re: SEASIK 1.0 released

2010-06-12 Thread Eric Bielefeld
What is SEASIK? I don't think anyone ever said what it is, and if it is 1.0, it must be a new product. Please enlighten me. Eric Bielefeld Sr. Systems Programmer IBM Global Services Division Dubuque, Iowa 414-477-7259 --

Re: SEASIK 1.0 released

2010-06-12 Thread zMan
Eric: On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Paul Edwards mutazi...@gmail.com wrote: I have just released SEASIK 1.0, which is (effectively) a DFDSS dump of a whole lot of C products, namely: GCC 3.2.3 MVS 8.0 PDPCLIB 3.00 BISON 1.35 MVS 4.0 BREXX 2.1.8 MVS 1.0 BWBASIC 2.50 MVS 1.0 DIFFUTIL

Re: ATL question

2010-06-12 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2010-06-11 16:10, Mark Pace pisze: Doing a query on my 3494 shows some tapes in it's database that RMM and OAM do not show. Also the tapes really do not actually exist in the ATL, just in it's database. Is there a way to remove these entries short of a complete reinventory? What

Re: File 120 now has 2 new articles

2010-06-12 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 4c10e811.2090...@actionsoftware.com, on 06/10/2010 at 09:26 AM, Gord Tomlin gt.ibm.li...@actionsoftware.com said: Using my DASD space for *articles* is not the obvious choice! You're not the only user. Using *my* DASD space for articles that I want to read is the obvious choice. --

George McLaren is out of the office

2010-06-12 Thread George McLaren
I will be out of the office starting 12/06/2010 and will not return until 05/07/2010. I will respond to your mail, if required ,on my return. If urgent please contact Richard Mackay on 53459. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

Re: EDC5113I reason code = 053501B2 in/ /etc/utmpx

2010-06-12 Thread ibmnew
Dear all Yes you are right. It will be reset back to 644 during the next IPL becuase there is ''chmod 644 /etc/utmpx' statement in the /etc/rc. Who could tell us another solution for it? We want to change owner of /bin/fomtlout from OEDFLT(UID=99) to BPXOINIT(UID=0).