On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:42:33 +0200, R.S. wrote:
Q2. My ZFS has extents. I want to consolidate it to avoid out-of-extents
condition in the future. How can I do it? Can I simply allocate larger
cluster and perform IDCAMS REPRO?
(the filesystem can be unmounted for that time)
DFDSS supports
In c648d10634943c4891f7085d0dad806b9dcb5...@usmbx06.aafes.com, on
09/16/2010
at 12:40 PM, Elliot, David elli...@aafes.com said:
Wasn't R0 used (at one time) for the message id to link multiline
WTOs together?
R0 was used for several things. I suspect that some of them are still
in WTO. Keep
A shell script will also work just fine to extract the system date in
just about any format practical.
See the MAN pages for the UNIX DATE command.
HTH,
snip
I came up against this and now build the whole ftp job using a batch
initiated REXX program.
/snip
On 09/16/2010 10:04 AM, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 9:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ZFS questions
I need to perform some changes with ZFS
That was the problem, overrode the EDCC procedure with a //LKED
Sam:
That was the problem, overrode the EDCC procedure with a //LKED.SYSIN DD *
with
an entry and name and it worked like a champ, thank you so much for the help.
Regards,
Scott J Ford
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
That was the problem, overrode the EDCC procedure with a //LKED
Sam:
That was the problem, overrode the EDCC procedure with a //LKED.SYSIN DD *
with
an entry and name and it worked like a champ, thank you so much for
At the risk of going overboard, here is JCL that will do this with Rexx.
The only advantage of this over PGM=EZACFSM1 (which is simpler) is that you
can do date manipulation (e.g. yesterday or next month).
The comments are, of course, optional.
//FTPTEST JOB
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:29:01 -0500, Robert Birdsall wrote:
At the risk of going overboard, [...] JCL [...] will do this with Rexx.
The only advantage of this over PGM=EZACFSM1 (which is simpler) is that you
can do date manipulation (e.g. yesterday or next month).
And I wonder about the support
... maybe its something new ???
Maybe it's something old. ISTR having a problem where SVC35 interpreted R0
as a UCMID when it shouldn't have. (Or, maybe, I'm confusing it with SVC34.)
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:42:44 -0700
From: scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Question on WTO
I need to work on a file and I've tried the 8192k I am allowed but the file
still
comes up in browse mode
Can I change it and how large can I change it
thanks
mace
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
it should be my personal signon region size
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
It depends on how your ID is defined to your security package. I was able to
get my ID defined with a 2 gig region size.
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-9179
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Larry
I know this question may have been asked and answered but I did not see it if
it was.
The question is: I'm running on a z800 (2066-0x2). Can I run z/OS 1.11 on this
box?
I am currently running z/OS 1.4 and want to upgrade to z/OS 1.11. I heard that
is level of software may not run on the 2066,
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 09/17/2010
12:36:07 PM:
I know this question may have been asked and answered but I did not
see it if it was.
The question is: I'm running on a z800 (2066-0x2). Can I run z/OS 1.
11 on this box?
I am currently running z/OS 1.4
From z/OS Planning for Installation:
4.3.1 Identifying server requirements
The only IBM servers on which z/OS V1R11 runs are the IBM System z
servers, which are:
* IBM System z10 Enterprise Class (z10 EC)
* IBM System z10 Business Class (z10 BC)
* IBM System z9 Enterprise
In aanlktiks+kkf+n4kfqzcgrja1vaccpbjxmp2-h02=...@mail.gmail.com, on
09/16/2010
at 05:32 PM, Roberto Halais roberto.hal...@gmail.com said:
Why don't you use a REXX script that will generate your JCL and parms
and submit the job.
Why submit a separate job? Do the FTP in the script.
--
And, of course, as someone pointed out (thanks, Jim), R11 will also run
on a z196!
John Eells wrote:
From z/OS Planning for Installation:
4.3.1 Identifying server requirements
The only IBM servers on which z/OS V1R11 runs are the IBM System z
servers, which are:
* IBM System z10 Enterprise
I've heard of a site with this box that has experienced a failure of
multiple CPU engines. The built-in redundancy of the CPU picked up the
data processing with no visible affects. The CPU is still currently
running with no degradation or customer impacts.
They are planning a 7 hour outage
Your TSO region size does not affect whether the system will edit a dataset.
If the dataset is too large, you will abend when you run out of virtual memory.
What causes edit to switch to browse is the DCB attributes of the dataset. For
me, it is usually RECFM. What are the attributes of the
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:54:08 -0700, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I've heard of a site with this box that has experienced a failure of
multiple CPU engines. The built-in redundancy of the CPU picked up the
data processing with no visible affects. The CPU is still currently
running with no degradation or
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:54:08 -0700, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I've heard of a site with this box that has experienced a failure of
multiple CPU engines. The built-in redundancy of the CPU picked up the
data processing with
On 17 September 2010 14:24, Schwarz, Barry A barry.a.schw...@boeing.com wrote:
Your TSO region size does not affect whether the system will edit a dataset.
Uh...
If the dataset is too large, you will abend when you run out of virtual
memory.
Sure, but it runs out because the TSO region
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z10 E12
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Tom Marchant m42tom-
ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think I made my regions something like 208K. I can edit pretty
much anything in TSO with this region size, and I run some very large
REXX execs that read in large files.
C. Todd Burrell
PMP, MCSE 2003:Security
Security+, Network+
ITIL V3 Foundations
CSC Lead z/OS Systems Programmer
W dniu 2010-09-17 20:34, Mike Schwab pisze:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Tom Marchantm42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:54:08 -0700, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I've heard of a site with this box that has experienced a failure of
multiple CPU engines. The built-in
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 13:34 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
Isn't the model E12 a one book machine?
--
Tom Marchant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_System_z10
Correct
H ...
And what if it has (say) 15 IFLs ?.
With CPs and IFLs spread all over the place, there may well be
cross/multi
26 matches
Mail list logo
