Re: tar limitation preventing SAS install

At 12:34 -0800 on 12/31/2010, Schwarz, Barry A wrote about Re: tar limitation preventing SAS install: I started out to do what you suggested but got bogged down with 40 character substrings that appeared in a node name, was repeated in a leaf name in that path, and then differed by only a few

Re: How to display main storage map ?

On 12/31/2010 5:01 AM, Xavier Martínez wrote: Thanks for your info. I tried to found this information with IPCS but no results. Here is an example of what VSMINFO produces under IPCS: CVT: 00FDCC00 GDA: 0222C318 LDA: 7FF18E10 PRIVATE STORAGE DATA SHOWN IS FOR DEFAULT ASID: X'57' STO

Review of Past IBM Drives

http://www.macworld.com/article/156758/2010/12/harddriveevolution.html?lsrc=nl_mwnws_h_crawl -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN

Re: Send message to another job's joblog

On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:12:34 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >In , on 12/28/2010 > at 07:52 PM, "W. Kevin Kelley" said: > >>There is no ability to specify a destination of JOBLOG on WTO. > >Doesn't ROUTCDE=11 serve that purpose with normal console >configurations? > > Seymour, Using ro

Re: How to display main storage map ?

On 12/31/2010 4:42 AM, John McKown wrote: Basically, "no". There is no IBM supplied standard command (operator or TSO user) which displays this information. Hum, you might be able to get it using IPCS under TSO, but I don't know for sure. You can get it under IPCS from the VSMINFO choice on the

Re: CEEROPT

!!! I didn't see Lizette's message, but I believe this is exactly what I want! I just tried it (SETCEE CEEROPT,ALL) and now my batch job is picking up my CEEROPT. Tres cool! And it's all there in pink and purple in the documentation. I just didn't know what to look for! Now I can end the yea

Re: CEEROPT

On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:01:00 -0700, Steve Comstock wrote: >On 12/31/2010 2:51 PM, Mark Zelden wrote: >> Lizette was close. In z/OS 1.10 there was change made so that downleveled >> LE runtime was not supported. Part of that change also included a change >> to CEEROPT: >> >> "CEEROPT is expanded

ISPF Program Edit Macro

With recent SUBMIT discussions (ie. ISPFTEMP data set size / lrecl restrictions) I thought I'd try and create a program EDIT MACRO (assembler) to submit the unsaved EDIT/VIEW data. The EDIT MACRO is working great but I dislike having to issue !EDITSUB to call the macro. I tried adding "CMD(!ED

Re: CEEROPT

On 12/31/2010 2:51 PM, Mark Zelden wrote: Lizette was close. In z/OS 1.10 there was change made so that downleveled LE runtime was not supported. Part of that change also included a change to CEEROPT: "CEEROPT is expanded so that it can now be loaded outside of the CICS and LRR environments. T

Re: CEEROPT

On 12/31/2010 1:06 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote: Thanks for the validation, Steve! :-) That is exactly what I am wanting. I'd like to be able do "something" so that an entire batch job with multiple EXEC PGM=... steps would share the same ENVAR runtime option. Is this not a reasonable thing to w

Re: Linking Code from z/OS Unix archives in Batch JCL?

Instead of INCLUDE, use LIBRARY. e.g. LIBRARY /shr/openssl/lib/libcrypto.a LIBRARY /shr/openssl/lib/libssl.a In article <4d1e17c6.4020...@t-online.de> you wrote: > Is it possible to link code directly from z/OS Unix > archive files? > I tried it this way: > //LKED EXEC PROC=WCIEWL, > //

Re: CEEROPT

Lizette was close. In z/OS 1.10 there was change made so that downleveled LE runtime was not supported. Part of that change also included a change to CEEROPT: "CEEROPT is expanded so that it can now be loaded outside of the CICS and LRR environments. This support is controlled by using keywords

Re: tar limitation preventing SAS install

I used the Windows version of the gnu tar-1.13-1 which was the best-looking one that my first Google search turned up. It built the tar file with long paths names just fine. Just not in ustar format. I am going to experiment with their libarchive-2.4.12-1 which claims ustar capability since I

Re: tar limitation preventing SAS install

I started out to do what you suggested but got bogged down with 40 character substrings that appeared in a node name, was repeated in a leaf name in that path, and then differed by only a few characters form a different node at the same level. What I ended up trying while waiting for responses

Re: CEEROPT

Thanks for the validation, Steve! :-) That is exactly what I am wanting. I'd like to be able do "something" so that an entire batch job with multiple EXEC PGM=... steps would share the same ENVAR runtime option. Is this not a reasonable thing to want? Maybe I'll open a SHARE requirement...

Re: CEEROPT

Thanks for confirming that. I know all about CEEUOPT (which I hate, because it makes it a "link-time run-time option") and CEEOPTS DD (and PARM=). I just can't see any reason why CEEROPT might not also be useful for batch. Specifically, I was thinking I could make a CEEROPT member with an ENV

Re: CEEROPT

On 12/31/2010 11:27 AM, Frank Swarbrick wrote: Is CEEROPT supposed to be able to affect a regular batch job, or is it just for CICS and IMS? I assembled a CEEROPT in to a private load library and then put it in my JOBLIB concatenation but it doesn't appear to have any effect. Works fine for a C

Re: CEEROPT

If you are at z/os v1.9 or above You can use CEE Parmlib member of SYS1.PARMLIB if the LE parms applies to all cics regions. This will handle batch and online parm requirements. Then you do not need to create a CCECOPT or CEEUOPT and link it directly into the application. In batch you can also u

Re: CEEROPT

Frank, For batch, you should be using a CEEUOPT CSECT instead. You can also use PARM overrides on your EXEC PGM=...,PARM='/...leparms...' if you don't exceed PARM length limitations. And there is a new //CEEOPTS DD statement that you can use instead of PARM and/or CEEUOPT (if you're on the proper z

Re: CEEROPT

Frank Swarbrick wrote: Is CEEROPT supposed to be able to affect a regular batch job, or is it just for CICS and IMS? CICS/IMS. I assembled a CEEROPT in to a private load library and then put it in my JOBLIB concatenation but it doesn't appear to have any effect. Works fine for a CICS regio

CEEROPT

Is CEEROPT supposed to be able to affect a regular batch job, or is it just for CICS and IMS? I assembled a CEEROPT in to a private load library and then put it in my JOBLIB concatenation but it doesn't appear to have any effect. Works fine for a CICS region. Is this "working as designed"? T

Re: C++ compiler message CCN5802 The character literal %1$s contains more than one character.

Cross-posting to IBM-MAIN and MVS-OE because I asked the original question both places. Someone asked to see the source code. I am populating an STL map. The statements have the form mymap.insert(pair('ABCD', "some string")); (Why would I want to do that? Mymap is basically a sparse array and

Linking Code from z/OS Unix archives in Batch JCL?

Is it possible to link code directly from z/OS Unix archive files? I tried it this way: //LKED EXEC PROC=WCIEWL, // AMODE=31,RMODE=ANY,REUS=RENT, // SYSLMOD='ADPSAE.LEHR.GRP20.LOAD', // SYSOUT=A, // SYSLIN='&&TEMPDSN' //SYSINDD * INCLUDE '/shr/opens

Re: tar limitation preventing SAS install

In , on 12/30/2010 at 04:51 AM, Mike Schwab said: >The mainframe itself never has had a built in display FSVO builtin. I'd certainly consider an, e.g., 3066, to be builtin. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: Antwort: Re: tar limitation preventing SAS install

In , on 12/30/2010 at 01:37 PM, Paul Gilmartin said: >Can't you order it from Microsoft? Order what? New local policy? >Problem: SAS doesn't know how to spell SMP/E. Or FTP; they insist on using HTTP for delivery. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: Authorized Rexx Assembler Function

In , on 12/31/2010 at 06:34 AM, Walt Farrell said: >I believe the question I responded to was, approximately, "why can't >my Rexx function, written in assembler, run authorized?" The OP mention using the REXX compiler, linking AC(1), using an authorized library and adding it to the authorized

Re: C++ compiler message CCN5802 The character literal %1$s contains more than one character.

In , on 12/30/2010 at 05:15 PM, Scott Rowe said: >I'm not positive, but to be strictly accurate, isn't a quotation mark >symbol this:", while this:' is an apostrophe? Sort of; strictly speaking quotes and apostrophes are directional rather than vertical, and I believe that Unicode has code po

Re: Authorized Rexx Assembler Function

In <0377b9a583fd0e4aacd676ee33ee994b4875a...@sdkmail13.emea.sas.com>, on 12/31/2010 at 02:56 PM, Lindy Mayfield said: >That is exactly what I meant by my question. Rexx assembler >function, authorized properly, put into the TSO command IKJTSOxx >table, won't run authorized. If you really mea

Re: tar limitation preventing SAS install

In , on 12/30/2010 at 09:44 AM, "McKown, John" said: >Ah, I "fondly" remember the 370/145's builtin console. But the one on >the 168 was really neat - it was actually a vector-based 3270 No, the 3066 wasn't remeotely similar to a 3270. The only device it[1] was compatible with was the consol

IPCS Evaluate Question

Hi, It is my understanding that when you reterive data from a IPCS dump using Evaluate And Specify "REXX(STORAGE(STRG) UNFORMATTED)" The data is returned as a Hex String meaning C1C2C3 is 3 Bytes in String Not 6 When I use SUBSTR to pick out the fields and Format them C2X,C2D Everything

Re: Send message to another job's joblog

In , on 12/28/2010 at 07:52 PM, "W. Kevin Kelley" said: >There is no ability to specify a destination of JOBLOG on WTO. Doesn't ROUTCDE=11 serve that purpose with normal console configurations? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: C++ compiler message CCN5802 The character literal %1$s contains more than one character.

I'm having a similar issue with message CCN1109 (infinite loop warning). I tried to use #pragma report(disable,"CCN1109") but still get the message. I didn't get this message the last time I compiled the program but we're on a newer version of z/OS now. It sounds like there may be an issue with

Re: Paging Jay Maynard

In <1127436455-1293328639-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-5023454...@bda506.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>, on 12/26/2010 at 01:57 AM, Ted MacNEIL said: >But, my point was that Easter and Passover were not celebrated on the >same day (or rarely). Pesach is a full week. It's the first day (

Re: Paging Jay Maynard

In , on 12/25/2010 at 10:03 PM, Binyamin Dissen said: >Incorrect. It is a seven day holiday. Pesach is one of the holidays where an extra day is added Bch"ol (outside of Israel), and I'm so used to it thatI don't normally think of the extra day as artificial. You are, of course, correct; the

Re: REXX Interpret and "*"

In , on 12/27/2010 at 11:57 AM, John Mattson said: >Subject: REXX Interpret and "*" The interpret statement is intended to simplify programming of complicated tasks. Why are you using it to complicate the programming of a simple task? >/* REXX */ Okay so far. >arg cmd That will break if

Re: Programmer Charged with thieft (maybe off topic)

In , on 12/29/2010 at 08:54 AM, "Chase, John" said: >Casinos have rules. 1. Never give a sucker an even break 2. Take the money and run 3. The house always wins. 4. If there is inadvertently an element of skill in a game that we advertise as a test of skill, playing skillfully is t

Re: How to display main storage map ?

On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 08:43:26 -0500, Lizette Koehler wrote: >I am not sure what you mean by "without this program" but if you go to Mark >Zelden Website and download the REXX process called IPLINFO. It already >gets the following information > And also other freeware like MXI and ShowMVS. BTW

Re: Authorized Rexx Assembler Function

That is exactly what I meant by my question. Rexx assembler function, authorized properly, put into the TSO command IKJTSOxx table, won't run authorized. We went already over at least twice how to do it 1) properly, and 2) "Don't do it, looking for trouble, it ain't my dog, etc". My why wasn

Re: How to display main storage map ?

I am not sure what you mean by "without this program" but if you go to Mark Zelden Website and download the REXX process called IPLINFO. It already gets the following information The real storage online at IPL time was 18432M. The real storage increment size is 256M with 72 increments installed.

Re: How to display main storage map ?

Hello John: Thanks for your info. I tried to found this information with IPCS but no results. I will read information that you've linked. Regards. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send ema

Re: How to display main storage map ?

Basically, "no". There is no IBM supplied standard command (operator or TSO user) which displays this information. Hum, you might be able to get it using IPCS under TSO, but I don't know for sure. The information is in a z/OS control block. Read up on VSMLIST, if you're interested. http://publibz.

Re: Authorized Rexx Assembler Function

On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:47:19 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >In , on 12/29/2010 > at 06:46 AM, Walt Farrell said: > >>(1) Normal Rexx environments (as extablished by TSO or by IRXEXEC in >>batch) do not themselves run authorized. > >I'm confused. The question did not concern the EXEC c

How to display main storage map ?

Hello all : I need to know how to display main storage map like that, but without this program : >>MSTORAGE BBDDI026I MSTORAGE AMTMS1I AREASTARTE