Hi,
Output of the command : D C,HC :
RESPONSE=ZOSB
IEE889I 11.26.51 CONSOLE DISPLAY 468
MSG: CURR=0LIM=1500 RPLY:CURR=1LIM=20 SYS=ZOSB PFK=00
CONSOLEID --- SPECIFICATIONS ---
SYSLOG COND=H AUTH=CMDS NBUF=N/A
On 4/4/2011 4:40 PM, Dan Skomsky, PSTI wrote:
I'll give you my green/yellow/white card when you pry it from my cold, dead
hands!
You don't care about the pink version? g
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT
--
For IBM-MAIN
2) OS Version is : 1.8
The message id might have changed since then, as 1.8 is out of service. In
any case, the D C,HC putput clearly shows that you still have a syslog and
hence a hardcopy log.
3) Ouput of command : /D LOGGER,LOGSTREAM.
You neglected to provide the status of the OPERLOG log
You don't care about the pink version? g
Oh Gerhard! ROTFL and getting strange looks from my colleague
Barbara
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Ron Hawkins
ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Well, in that case no program allocates a dataset listed in JCL.
Would it be acceptable if I said The IEFBR14 example from the original post
is one example of a
program that would cause the allocation of such a
I find it very hard to believe that:
we use MVS/MF only because we have old APPL which wd be expensive to
convert to Win/Linx/Ux
It has taken 20+ years to develope improve all the
Online/Trnx/Batch/Monitor/Tool/Plex/HSM/SMS/DB for MF, because they were
needed to run IT.
Are all these
Hi,
Apology for not being more precise. Ouput for the command : /D
LOGGER,LOGSTREAM.
D LOGGER,LOGSTREAM
IXG601I 12.20.54 LOGGER DISPLAY 02
INVENTORY INFORMATION BY LOGSTREAM
LOGSTREAM STRUCTURE
- -
ATR.CTSPLEX.ARCHIVE*DASDONLY*
On 5/04/2011 5:08 AM, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 4 April 2011 16:27, Jim Mulderd10j...@us.ibm.com wrote:
snip
Perhaps naturally, the attitudes of our own support people and
developers follow to some extent. These attitudes clash when one of
our components that runs on z/OS UNIX is in the
W dniu 2011-04-05 08:46, R Hey pisze:
I find it very hard to believe that:
we use MVS/MF only because we have old APPL which wd be expensive to
convert to Win/Linx/Ux
It has taken 20+ years to develope improve all the
Online/Trnx/Batch/Monitor/Tool/Plex/HSM/SMS/DB for MF, because they were
What is the throughput of coax connection?
I'm aware hat it's usually used for hard terminal connectivity, i.e.
3278 to 3174 and speed is simply good enough.
However let's imagine PC with coax card connected to 3174 and IND$FILE
transfer. What throughput can be expected?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 20:53:35 -0500 W. Kevin Kelley wkkel...@optonline.net
wrote:
:On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:09:29 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
:obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote:
:Are there any tutorials/samples for writing floating point assembler code.
We
:need to work with the z/VM
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pcomhelp/v5r9/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.pcomm.doc/books/html/admin_guide11.htm
Between 19.2Kbps and 115Kpbs limits for various connections.
2011/4/5 R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl:
What is the throughput of coax connection?
I'm aware hat it's usually
I'm not so sure. Based on what I think is Shmuel's logic, no JCL dataset is
allocated by a PGM because allocation occurs before PGM Fetch.
And we all agree that Open is different to Allocate. In your example the
program opens the file, but it was allocated well before the program loaded.
I
Must I now use extended save areas, as I am doing something
to the top halves of the GPRs, or will the system take
care of that for me?
Assuming this is a simple application, the system is not going to do
anything for you with respect to saving registers. If you are responsible
for your
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl (R.S.) writes:
What is the throughput of coax connection?
I'm aware hat it's usually used for hard terminal connectivity,
i.e. 3278 to 3174 and speed is simply good enough.
However let's imagine PC with coax card connected to 3174 and IND$FILE
transfer. What
Peter Relson wrote:
begin snippet
If you do need to save/restore, then there are several choices of which
BAKR...PR is one, STMH...LMH is another, and having your caller provide a
144-byte savearea and using STMG...LMG is another
/end snippet
Of these three the third, a 144-byte savearea and
As a result of the recent thread called Mainframe Fresher,
I put together a page for our website titled Cool Things
You Can Do in z/OS.
Of course, one man's cool is another's so what?, and even
one's own list is likely to change. So here are the criteria
I used to compile my list:
* To be
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:04:07 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 029501cbf09d$743f5370$5cbdfa50$@hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net, on
04/01/2011
at 11:48 AM, Ron Hawkins said:
The IEFBR14 example from the original post is one example of a
program that would allocate such a dataset.
IEFBR14
Hello,
I am trying to copy my SYSRES volume( ex: IPE100) into one
new volume ( ex IPE101). All the dataset inside IPE100 is managed by
indirect cataloging.
I am using below JCL for this function.
//DUMPUP01 JOB CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=A,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),
//
My __guess__ is that your STORCLAS ACS routine is assigning a storage class to
the new allocations. In my shop, I __must__ specify the parameter:
STORAGECLASS(NONSMS) which is tested in the ACS routines to make a dataset non
SMS managed. Again, AT MY SHOP, this is a requirement. Why? Because
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:29:26 -0500, Jan MOEYERSONS wrote:
I've run your example here and it behaves exactly as I expected:
- the allocate dd(atomic) new delete dsn(TEMP.DUP1) fails because the
dataset already exists.
- the delete TEMP.DUP1 simply deletes it.
- the rename TEMP.DUP2 TEMP.DUP1
I'm looking for some solution for file exchange between z/OS and
Windows/Linux platform.
The only requirement is to encrypt the file (PS dataset) on z/OS side
and decrypt it on distributed side and vice versa.
Nice to have:
- hash calculation
- compression
- exploitation of CPACF or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
I'm looking for some solution for file exchange between z/OS and
Windows/Linux platform.
The only requirement is to encrypt the file (PS dataset) on z/OS side
and decrypt it on distributed side and vice
z/OS Encryption Facility. Should be distributed with z/OS 1.9 and above.
I believe this is ziip enabled/
FTPS or SFTP (can never remember which is which). Both should be
available with z/OS ported tools
AT-TLS feature of z/OS Comm Server. (I believe this is zip enabled)
HTH,
snip
I'm looking for
On 04/05/11 09:31, R.S. wrote:
I'm looking for some solution for file exchange between z/OS and
Windows/Linux platform.
The only requirement is to encrypt the file (PS dataset) on z/OS side
and decrypt it on distributed side and vice versa.
Nice to have:
- hash calculation
- compression
-
z/OS Encryption facility might be just the right thing for you.
It is based on OpenPGP and can utilize the Crypto coprocessor.
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/encryption_facility/
Cheers, Johannes
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Steve, It might be a millionth of a degree cooler to add the fact that you can
send emails from CICS as well as batch jobs?
See the XMITCICS freeware (written in COBOL) at
www.thenightland.co.uk/MYWEB/mvsxmitmail.html
for the method
Andy Robertson telephone mobile
I believe Shmuel's point was that the allocation of a data set which is
specified by JCL is accomplished by the component called the
Initiator/Terminator, whose program names typically begin with IEF. Also
anyone can write his own private code to do a dynamic allocation [1] of a data
set and
Why encrypt and decrypt? Does it need to be on Linux in encrypted form? If not,
and if it were me, I'd use Dovetailed Technologies' Co:Z dspipes utilities and
simply transfer the files over an SSH tunnel. Using Co:Z, it is easy. And the
product is free to download. It contains some Linux
On 4/5/2011 7:52 AM, Andy Robertson wrote:
Steve, It might be a millionth of a degree cooler to add the fact that you can
send emails from CICS as well as batch jobs?
See the XMITCICS freeware (written in COBOL) at
www.thenightland.co.uk/MYWEB/mvsxmitmail.html
for the method
Andy,
That is
Saurabh,
There is a parameter in ADRDSSU where you can bypass the ACS routines,
something like BYPASSACS. Check out the manual.
HTH
Richard
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] on behalf of McKown,
John
Thanks for the kind plug John
A few comments -
- With IBM Ported Tools OpenSSH, you can put your SSH keys in a SAF /
RACF Keyring, which is much better than having them in a file
(regardless of the protection of that file).
- Co:Z Launcher and Co:Z SFTP definitely work with Windows using the
Hi,
You can use the below as sample JCL :
*
//CPxxx EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//FROM1 DD VOL=SER=xxx,DISP=SHR,UNIT=SYSALLDA
//TO1 DD VOL=SER=yyy,DISP=SHR,UNIT=SYSALLDA
//SYSIN DD *
COPY LOGINDD(FROM1) OUTDD(TO1) TOL(IOERROR) -
ALLDATA(*) ALLEXCP ADMIN PURGE -
DELETE
Thanks Richard,
I tried using STORAGE CLASS parameter(
NOSMS). but still got same error. Now I am searching for the parameter
you suggested.
Regards
On 4/5/2011 7:38 PM, Richard Marchant wrote:
Saurabh,
There is a parameter in ADRDSSU where you can bypass
IBM provided a support pac (CA1H) several years ago with samples of CICS
programs that send email.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 10:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
Thanks Jagdishan,
But still I am not able to copy my
VSAM dataset, which is also available in that volume. Rest all dataset
are copied successfully. Can you please tell me the way to copy VSAM
dataset as well in the same JCL.
Regards
Saurabh Khandelwal
On
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:21:47 +, john gilmore wrote:
Peter Relson wrote:
begin snippet
If you do need to save/restore, then there are several choices of which
BAKR...PR is one, STMH...LMH is another, and having your caller provide a
144-byte savearea and using STMG...LMG is another
/end
Hi,
Please share us the Error message copying the VSAM Datasets. I mean can you
point out the ADRxxx message related to the VSAM copy failure.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:16 PM, SAURABH KHANDELWAL
saurabh.khandel...@oracle.com wrote:
Thanks Jagdishan,
But
In original post, there is no 'delete' parameter specified, but even so,
there are still some DataSets had been copied successfully. Do not know why,
may these copied ones are not cataloged.
2011/4/5 SAURABH KHANDELWAL saurabh.khandel...@oracle.com
Thanks Richard,
Hi,
Incase if you are trying to move your HSM control Files(MCDS,OCDS,BCDS).
Then probably you might get this error because HSM control files are Normal
VSAM files. If this is your case then you have to stop HSM and Invoke DFDSS
to move on the VSAM datasets.
Regards,
Jags
On Tue, Apr 5,
Is z/OS Encryption Facility different from ICSF ? A link to the app prog
guide here :
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r10/topic/com.ibm.zos.r10.csfb400/toc.htm
N
2011/4/5 Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com
Thanks for the kind plug John
A few comments -
- With IBM Ported Tools
2011/4/5 R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl:
I'm looking for some solution for file exchange between z/OS and
Windows/Linux platform.
The only requirement is to encrypt the file (PS dataset) on z/OS side and
decrypt it on distributed side and vice versa.
Nice to have:
- hash calculation
Hello,
Along with PS and PDS i am also coping VSAM dataset
available like IODF cluster file etc and getting below error.
0ADR468E (001)-DDFLT(04), VSAM DATA SET SYS1.IODFD0.WORK.CLUSTER IN
CATALOG CATALOG.MASTER.MCAT IS NOT PROCESSABLE
0ADR468E (001)-DDFLT(04), VSAM DATA SET
Certificate based TLS FTP is native to the z/os platform. While certificates
are very secure, they do carry a pretty good learning curve. Any z/os hardware
features installed on the box are exploited by default, I think.
Typically encryption defeats compression. It seems that you can have one
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.comwrote:
It is worth noting that the system provides a 144-byte save area when
a program is ATTACHed, as for example when a job step program is given
control.
true, and somewhat ironic given that it is one of the few
snip
Is z/OS Encryption Facility different from ICSF ? A link to the app prog
guide here :
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r10/topic/com.ibm.zos.r10
.csfb400/toc.htm
/snip
YES!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:22:29 -0400, Chris Craddock wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
It is worth noting that the system provides a 144-byte save area when
a program is ATTACHed, as for example when a job step program is given
control.
true, and somewhat ironic given
Cross-posted to IBMVM, IBMMAIN, and Linux390 for those who enjoy
the no charge webcasts about System z topics
Choice of two live calls or you can wait for the replay in a few days.
Title:
Problem Reporting and Analysis Linux on System z - How to survive a Linux
critical situation
Speaker:
Sven
Encrypted data is usually though to be non-compressible. If you want
compression in addition to encryption you'd compress first and then
encrypt the compressed data file.
Mark Jacobs
On 04/05/11 11:20, Hal Merritt wrote:
Certificate based TLS FTP is native to the z/os platform. While
The short answer is 'yes', but the most correct answer may be that flushing
happens as needed by the buffer managment routines, and a final, full flush
when the file is closed. If you have enjoyed a very high buffer 'hit rate',
then most all of the updated data may be in the buffers and
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com wrote:
Certificate based TLS FTP is native to the z/os platform. While certificates
are very secure, they do carry a pretty good learning curve. Any z/os
hardware features installed on the box are exploited by default, I
* To be considered cool, a feature or facility of z/OS must:
+ Have useful, real world application
+ Be generally unknown by z/OS application programmers
(most people on this list already know these features,
but application programmers are generally not as
current, due
G'Day To All,
I would like to know if there is something similar to the TTOC function in
ABARS? The reason I ask is that the tape is badly damaged and I would like to
know what dsns are on the tape. This application hasn't been run for over 1
year.
Cheers
Thanks.
I too use the generic HOLDSYS, and since I run APPLY CHECKS first, and
review the hold listing, I see (and review) every hold that I'm bypassing
before I do the real APPLY.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.comwrote:
I always use the vanilla HOLDSYS with no
The real apply when doing a bypass holdsys does not get a zero return code but
a
4.
From: Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, April 5, 2011 3:04:18 PM
Subject: Re: SMP/E BYPASS( HOLDSYS( reason-list ) )
I too use the generic
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Problems on z systems aren't tolerated like in the distributed
environment.
Agreed wrt z/OS, but what about virtualized z servers like Linux on z
and zBX? Maybe people want distributed-style application RAS;
doesn't mean
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Problems on z systems aren't tolerated like in the distributed
environment.
Agreed wrt z/OS, but what about virtualized z servers like Linux on z
and zBX?
On 4 April 2011 21:53, W. Kevin Kelley wkkel...@optonline.net wrote:
The floating point instructions in some ways are easier to use than the
integer
instructions because you don't have to worry about scaling and implied
decimal points and all of that. The biggest problem with floating point
Of course the usage of the Linux instance will have to be of a certain
type in order to support such a high ratio. But given the right workload,
you could support a very high number of virtual servers.
I think like most things that we end up involved in.. it depends can
certainly lead you in a
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:10:53 -0700, Bill Johnson wrote:
The real apply when doing a bypass holdsys does not get a zero return code but
a 4.
I thought that lately there was an option to cause RC=0 in this case.
But I can't find it in the manuals.
-- gil
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:28:47 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
They can run about 300 Linux servers per IFL, and share much of the
disk space by mounting the Operating System Read only, and only have a
small amount of unique disk space per instance.
CMS does better than Linux and most other OSes in this
Beginning with SMP/E V3.5 the severity of messages issued for
BYPASS(HOLDSYS) changed from warning to informational, so they result in
RC=00. In order to get the old behavior (RC=04) you have to add the
COMPAT(WARNBYPASS) parm to the EXEC stmt for the SMP/E job.
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:10:53 -0700, Bill Johnson wrote:
The real apply when doing a bypass holdsys does not get a zero return code but
a 4.
I thought that lately there was an option to cause RC=0 in this case.
But I can't find it in the manuals.
Actually, these days
On 4/5/2011 at 04:09 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
CMS does better than Linux and most other OSes in this respect
in that it can run its kernel in shared read-only memory.
Linux has been able to run out of an NSS for years now, just like CMS. It's
also been able to use DCSS
On 4/4/2011 2:21 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
I totally agree. This situation has been shaping up for a long
Steve:
I totally agree. This situation has been shaping up for a long time. Apparently,
the work 'plan' is a 4 letter word
Scott J Ford
Scott,
Something strange is going on, either
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Weird Reply Fragments (Was: Re: Mainframe Fresher)
On 4/4/2011 2:21 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
I
W dniu 2011-04-05 22:25, Bob Rutledge pisze:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:10:53 -0700, Bill Johnson wrote:
The real apply when doing a bypass holdsys does not get a zero return
code but a 4.
I thought that lately there was an option to cause RC=0 in this case.
But I can't
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 4/4/2011 2:21 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
I totally agree. This situation has been shaping up for a long
Steve:
I totally agree. This situation has been shaping up for a long time.
Apparently,
the work 'plan' is a 4 letter word
Scott J Ford
Scott,
Something strange
I'm using the Binder API to map load modules. Getting an 83000505 from an
include for a load module. The reason code explanation says
83000505 INCLUDE Included module
marked NOT-EDITABLE and has been bypassed.
Can
Registration is open for this Wed. April 20 System z user group:
Bay Area System z programmers for z/OS, z/VM and Linux on System z
PDF: http://www.vm.ibm.com/events/zsf0411.pdf
To: Bay Area Systems Programmers for z/OS, z/VM and Linux on System z
Are you interested in getting together
Yes, I see what you see.
Linda
- Original Message -
From: Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 2:02:13 PM
Subject: Weird Reply Fragments (Was: Re: Mainframe Fresher)
On 4/4/2011 2:21 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
I totally
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:36:24 -0400, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net
wrote:
I too continue to use TSO TEST for certain things, and indeed it would
be a very good thing if they would add just a few little updates:
Better floating point support, as you suggest
Access register support
64-bit GPR
Two things to consider is this a 3174 attached to a cha
Radoslaw:
Two things to consider is this a 3174 attached to a channel , i.e.; Bus/Tag or
attached to a FEP(37xx), the transfer will bottleneck to its slowest device,
i.e.; a modem being slower than a mainframe channel ...
Scott J Ford
Hi,
1) Instead of copying your IODF cluster. You can even use your existing IODF
and Just IPL from the address of the new COD sysres volume, but point
LOADPARM at your normal IODF volume.
2) Or else you can define a new Cluster at the target volume and copy the
existing IODF cluster from the
add PROCESS(SYS1), then have a try.
2011/4/5 SAURABH KHANDELWAL saurabh.khandel...@oracle.com
Hello,
Along with PS and PDS i am also coping VSAM dataset available
like IODF cluster file etc and getting below error.
0ADR468E (001)-DDFLT(04), VSAM DATA SET SYS1.IODFD0.WORK.CLUSTER
Thanks Bob, I am not surprised, frankly
Scott J Ford
From: Bob Rutledge deerh...@ix.netcom.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, April 5, 2011 5:24:33 PM
Subject: Re: Weird Reply Fragments (Was: Re: Mainframe Fresher)
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 4/4/2011
I've never seen this when you send e-mail directly to me, Scott.
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, April 5, 2011 7:09:08 PM
Subject: Re: Weird Reply Fragments (Was: Re: Mainframe Fresher)
Thanks Bob, I am not
oh, sorry, 'PROCESS(SYS1)' is a control stmt that can be specified AS input
to ADRDSSU(DDname SYSIN), NOT a parameter, ;-)
Do not know whether it work or not, cause from your job's output, I got some
SYS1.** get copied successfully, Just have a try.
2011/4/6 chen lucky chenluck...@gmail.com
Please hit below commands and put output..
( D EMCS )
( D C,KEY=OPERLOG )
( D GRS,RES=(SYSZCNZ,*) )
Also check if there has been any Plex defined system Ipled for upgrade if
yes with what version...
I see no Operlog structure in your output..since not connected...
use this and let me know what you get..
//VFRVOLSER EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,PARM='LINECNT=',REGION=4M
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//INVOL1DD VOL=SER=FRVOLSER,UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR
//OUTVOL1 DD VOL=SER=TOVOLSER,UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR
My first guess would be yahoo.
I use YAHOO (.ca), and that has never happened with my posts.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
aah,forgot remove by condition so job can be ..
//VFRVOLSER EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=4M,PARM='TYPRUN=NORUN'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//INVOL1DD VOL=SER=FRVOLSER,UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR
//OUTVOL1 DD
Ok, I will run this in 15 min . and send you output
On 4/6/2011 9:40 AM, Ravi Gaur wrote:
aah,forgot remove by condition so job can be ..
//VFRVOLSER EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=4M,PARM='TYPRUN=NORUN'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//INVOL1DD VOL=SER=FRVOLSER,UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR
//OUTVOL1 DD
Output of below JCL
*JCL Used*
//DUMPUP01 JOB CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=A,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),
// NOTIFY=SYSUID
//STEP2 EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=4M,PARM='TYPRUN=NORUN'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//INVOL1DD VOL=SER=DMTRES,UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR
//OUTVOL1 DD VOL=SER=RES001,UNIT=3390,DISP=SHR
Hello Jags,
It is not about coping only IODF cluster file.
This problem is in general coping VSAM dataset along with NON VSAM
dataset. The last JCL which you suggested, that has worked out with Non
VSAM dataset, but in my some of the volume I do have VSAM dataset as
well,
I know Yahoo may have had some other issue
Hey stranger, hows life ?
I know Yahoo may have had some other issues...
Scott J Ford
From: Stan Saraczewski stan_saraczew...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, April 5, 2011 10:26:27 PM
Subject: Re:
Saurabh,
I pressume you are trying to perform DASD migration, so looking into your
Output only the IODF related Datasets(VSAMS) were not copied successfully.
Let me know if you accomplish copying the IODF VSAM using some parameters
that would meet your Objective.
Regards,
Jags
On Wed, Apr 6,
No, I am not using any parameter for coping VSAM dataset. I was asking
you to suggest me , if you have idea about any parameter, which can be
useful for coping VSAM dataset.
Regards
Saurabh Khandelwal
On 4/6/2011 10:52 AM, jagadishan perumal wrote:
Saurabh,
I pressume you are trying to
88 matches
Mail list logo
