MFNetDisk also support tapeless solution for emulated tapes.
MFNetDisk tape emulation let you select MFNetDisk tape manager soultion or
CA or IBM or any other tape manager solution.
MF only trasfer the data and the CCW commands to PC and by that reduce the
CPU utilization in MF.
The PC emulates th
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
> John,
> If you had read all of the included previous thread context in my previous
> response, the context was "the world's eventual conversion to format>", not a discussion limited to internal date usage by machines. I
> would say that ma
Hi,
Would anyone know what the differences at a point in time between the
values in TCBGRS and The Values of the registers in XRBREGS of the RB
pointed to by TCBRB
I am assuming of course TCBRB is the currently executing RB
THANKS
-
On 12/19/2011 05:39 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
Joel C. Ewing writes (of Julian days):
| That makes much sense for astronomers that work through
| the night and sleep during the day, but is a terrible fit for people
| and businesses that have to deal with "normal" work hours and
| who would never t
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:20:16 -0500 Tom Russell wrote:
> PR/SM dispatches Logical CPs not Logical Partitions.
I wonder if it'd be considered churlish to point out this wasn't always
the case.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
While the cache is MF DASD (which gives it great performance when writing and
reading from cache), CA-Vtape now has the ability to be offloaded to cheaper
dasd that is attached through an NFS Server (such as NetApp or Data Domain).
And you even have the flexability of having the offload copy go
Joel C. Ewing writes (of Julian days):
| That makes much sense for astronomers that work through
| the night and sleep during the day, but is a terrible fit for people
| and businesses that have to deal with "normal" work hours and
| who would never tolerate the same period of daylight being
| ca
On 12/19/2011 11:53 AM, Mike Schwab wrote:
How about the Julian Day as used by astronomers?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_day
Julian day is used in the Julian date (JD) system of time measurement
for scientific use by the astronomy community, presenting the interval
of time in days and fra
Offloading VTAPE to zIIP would not be so bad, no?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
R.S.
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 5:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Tapeless Solutions
W dniu 2011-12-19 23:02, Henke, George
CA VTape is a software solution that uses any disk that you happen to
have. The down side of this type of solution is the increased CPU usage
due to it being a software solution instead of a hardware solution, like
the TS7720, that uses private disk in behind the scenes.
Thank you and have a T
W dniu 2011-12-19 23:02, Henke, George pisze:
Will CA VTAPE work on regular MF or does it need the DS8800.
What???
CA VTAPE is from software being sold by CA. DS8800 is a DASD box being
sold by IBM.
CA VTAPE works on any mainframe DASD.
I don't know what does it mean "work on regular MF".
BT
Will CA VTAPE work on regular MF or does it need the DS8800.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Linda Mooney
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 8:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Tapeless Solutions
Hi George,
If y
>Data at PSW is
>
>UNEXPECTED RETURN-CODE: 6576
>
What level of z/OS?
What is this in COBOL, ASSEMBLER, PL1, etc..
What function was involved at the time?
Have you looked at the CEEDUMP and determined anything?
CEEHSFXS CEL Stack Frame eXit Schedule
A COBOL application with a regi
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Chase, John wrote:
>
> What's "magic" about -4713/01/01? Why not specify the epoch origin as
> the "Big Bang"? What would today's "Big Bang day number" be?
>
http://www.hebcal.com/
Mon, 19 December 2011 - 23rd of Kislev, 5772
5772 years ago would be 3761 BC.
Data at PSW is
UNEXPECTED RETURN-CODE: 6576
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother re
Multiply approximately 365.25 by approximately 15 (American) billion. The
result, 5.47875 times ten to the twelfth power (American trillion) will still
fit in a 64-bit register. And there's even room in the register to double it
(for plus and minus) and throw in one more for the year zero.
He
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Chase, John wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mike Schwab
>>
>> How about the Julian Day as used by astronomers?
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_day
>> Julian day is used in the Julian date (JD) syste
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mike Schwab
>
> How about the Julian Day as used by astronomers?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_day
> Julian day is used in the Julian date (JD) system of time measurement
for scientific use by the
> astronom
Mike Schwab's Wikipedia quote:
| Julian day is used in the Julian date (JD) system of time measurement
| for scientific use by the astronomy community, presenting the interval
| of time in days and fractions of a day since January 1, 4713 BC
| Greenwich noon. Julian date is recommended for astrono
How about the Julian Day as used by astronomers?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_day
Julian day is used in the Julian date (JD) system of time measurement
for scientific use by the astronomy community, presenting the interval
of time in days and fractions of a day since January 1, 4713 BC
Gree
On 12/19/2011 4:17 AM, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
But if I understand it right, the date is computed from the value in
the interval timer, along with various offsets, only when it is actually
needed. Nothing special actually happens at midnight on Dec. 31st.
Which is not how I remember it. The
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:44:00 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
>
>Perhaps the world's eventual conversion to "Star Date" (or similar) will
>be less confusing and disruptive :-)
>
Ummm... NVFL. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stardate
-- gil
--
> From: Lizette Koehler
> Subject: Re: zFS parm sysplex=filesys
> Does this mean with z/OS V1.13 I will have to change to SYSPLEX(YES) in
> order to have zFS files mounted? Or will zFS still mount even with
> SYSPLEX(NO)
Lizette,
With SYSPLEX(NO) zFS address space will mount its zFS dataset
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Mierowsky
>
> At least they didn't have to deal with this! Thankfully this was
sorted out long before computers were
> around!
>
> The Changes of 1752
> In accordance with a 1750 act of Parliament, England and i
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of DKM
>
> Just over seven years ago, I was hired as the Financial System Administrator
> at my place of
> emplacement. In my first interview, I was told how they were getting ready
> to pick a new ERP and get
> off th
PR/SM dispatches Logical CPs not Logical Partitions.
So Question 1 and 2 get the same answer. Any given Logical partiton can
have some logical CPs ready to run, and pther logical CPs in the WAIT
state. The ready to run CP will be dispatched on a real CP when it is
the highest priority Logical
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of J R
>
> "pour people"? - what, you mean like bartenders?
Must be the same kind of folks who "pour" over a manual in detail.
(What do they pour over the manual, and how does that help discern
details?)
And "loose" u
While it is admittedly unpleasant to have the system start enforcing
requirements that it has documented, and I'll grant that we don't often
make such runtime enforcement changes, here we are talking about assembly
where it should be fairly easy to address, and might well help avoid a
problem (
For "normal completion", the resetting of the other ECB's wait bits is
done, as Jim Mulder points out.
For "abnormal completion" (i.e., if you were waiting and woke up in your
recovery whether due to cancel or some other asynchronous abend), don't
count on it
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology
(snip, someone wrote)
> The changeover involved a series of steps:
> December 31, 1750 was followed by January 1, 1750 (under the
> "Old Style" calendar, Dec ember was the 10th month and January the 11th)
> March 24, 1750 was followed by March 25, 1751 (March 25 was the
> first day of the "O
You don't have to wait for it, you can also force it. Amdahl's MDF did
it. The main difference was that PR/SM is interrupt driven and MDF was
timeslice driven. Therefor it did not have to wait for the ducks to line
up, but simply took an entire domain from the processors when its time
was up and di
To dispatch entire LPARs would be waiting for 2n ducks to line up in a
row: An event with progressively high latency in the n>1 case. Which is
one reason we don't do it, I guess. (The 2n ducks would be the n logicals
and n physicals.)
Martin
Martin Packer,
Mainframe Performance Consultant, zCh
"Mauri Kanter" wrote in message
news:<7558267718421282.wa.itzuviem013.net...@bama.ua.edu>...
> Thank you Jim. Crystal Clear.
>
Mauri,
I was going to reply, that your view on pr/sm was incorrect: pr/sm does
not dispatch entire LPARs, but individual processors, if the LPAR's
weight allows it. But
33 matches
Mail list logo
