The possibilities of 2.5 Petabytes is, well, an awful lot.
Wait until Gen X+1 gets its hand on the 2.5PB machine. They would only weep
that their machine does not have an EB of storage !
Nagesh
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
In
CAFO-8tooGjrKVnYo3Dt5yv0nfdAn=ckkmebbkl86-0nsnnt...@mail.gmail.com,
on 01/15/2012
at 12:13 AM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said:
I suspect your iPhone has 32GB, not MB...
32 GiB of auxillary storage, perhaps, but I seriously doubt 8 GiB of
processor storage.
I can't help but wonder what
begin snippet
I can't help but wonder what some of the early computing pioneers
would think of this.
/end snippet
It is convenient to look at
John von Neumann, Lectures on probabilistic logics and the synthesis
of reliable organisms from unreliable components, in Automata
studies, edited by
Linda,
This development is simply amazingas a dinosaur of the original 80
column card age ...things have really changed, big time
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Linda Mooney linda.lst...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi
MR1026112735
Title - Provide a utility to remove residual systems from the sysplex CDS
I am told that this request, pointed out by Barbara Nitz, had been
answered incorrectly and that the response has been corrected to
recognized.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, John Gilmore wrote:
begin snippet
I can't help but wonder what some of the early computing pioneers
would think of this.
/end snippet
It is convenient to look at
John von Neumann, Lectures on probabilistic logics and the synthesis
of reliable organisms from
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Linda Mooney linda.lst...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi zMan,
Ah, well, whatz a couple of typpos among firends? :)
Indeed--we've all made that typo! The good news is that I'm not aware
of any environment in which both are a simultaneous options, so we're
unlikely to
Zman,
Geez..8mb on a 4381. Brings back a bunch of memories, real good ones...
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Jan 15, 2012, at 11:20 AM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Linda Mooney linda.lst...@comcast.net
linda.lst...@comcast.net (Linda Mooney) writes:
That's really tiny! Just in my career - The first machine I was paid
to work with was a 4341 with 8MB and 8 channels. My IPhone has
32MB. The possibilities of 2.5 Petabytes is, well, an awful lot. I
can't help but wonder what some of the early
Thanks for your responses.
The problem turned out to be because my JVM launcher was APF and the JNI
routine was not.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Justin R. Bendich
Sent: 13 January 2012 21:53
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Howz about 32K on an SS80? Some not so good...
In a message dated 1/15/2012 11:19:32 A.M. Central Standard Time,
scott_j_f...@yahoo.com writes:
Geez..8mb on a 4381. Brings back a bunch of memories, real good ones
--
For
A Gainsford writes:
begin snippet
Actually, the real obstacle to the use of break character is that,
anachronistic or not, most people already understand what the term
underscore character means, while break character produces only
confusion. My expectation is therefore that most will quite
Wow, 16k. On a 360/20. .man
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Jan 15, 2012, at 4:05 PM, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
Howz about 32K on an SS80? Some not so good...
In a message dated 1/15/2012 11:19:32 A.M. Central Standard Time,
In article capd5f5o4mxgbx35dfnbl6bfkx6x6v0bl-_myln_qfwqdy4d...@mail.gmail.com
you write:
[...]
to draw a line or score underneath, to underline
The character '_' does not have this function. It cannot indeed be
used in this way. To call it an underscore is thus at once incorrect
and rather
Regrettably, their forceful expression does not endow Mr Gainsford's
views with substantive merit. The OED defines the verb to underscore
as
to draw a line or score underneath, to underline
The character '_' does not have this function. It cannot indeed be
used in this way. To call it
Hi
I have a rexx calling SDSF using the following statement;
CALL *(SDSF)
As I run the rexx code several times in the same tso session, the rexx abends
with S878-10 and no longer can run until recycling my TSO session.
I suspect the SDSF program didn't freemain the storage it
hey.
ive always been pressured to be the best I thought this would intrigue
you money doesnt grow on trees!
http://adalmv.ad.funpic.org/breakingnews/31LeeLee/ now im recognized everywhere
give it a try for yourself...
see you later.
In 905a.699bcad5.3c449...@aol.com, on 01/15/2012
at 04:05 PM, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com said:
Howz about 32K on an SS80?
The UNIVAC SS80 and SS90 were decimal machines.
Some not so good...
UNIVAC 1005?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
Hi
I have a rexx calling SDSF using the following statement;
CALL *(SDSF)
As I run the rexx code several times in the same tso session, the rexx
abends with
S878-10 and no longer can run until recycling my TSO session.
I suspect the SDSF program didn't freemain the storage it
19 matches
Mail list logo
