Gil,
Maybe some mumbo jumbo too...
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 24, 2012, at 10:43 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:58:50 -0500, Scott Ford wrote:
>
>> Hey Gil,
>>
>> Is the IF/THEN assuming, big word here, that the 1 i
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:58:50 -0500, Scott Ford wrote:
>Hey Gil,
>
>Is the IF/THEN assuming, big word here, that the 1 is a return code, just a
>thought
>
>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:52:38 -0500, Bill Ashton wrote:
>>>
>>> In the JCL I start with a do-nothing BR14, and then surround each section
>>>
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:48:57 -0800, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>I'm not clear on what you are doing here. Are you saying this is somehow a
>replacement for this?
//REUSE EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//MYFILE DD DSN=MY.FILE,SPACE=(0,0),DISP=(MOD,DELETE)
//MYPGM EXEC PGM=MYPGM
//MYFILE DD DSN=MY.FILE,SPACE
I'm not clear on what you are doing here. Are you saying this is somehow a
replacement for this?
//REUSE EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//MYFILE DD DSN=MY.FILE,SPACE=(0,0),DISP=(MOD,DELETE)
//MYPGM EXEC PGM=MYPGM
//MYFILE DD DSN=MY.FILE,SPACE=(CYL,(100,10),RLSE),DISP=(NEW,CATLG)
How would this look usi
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:43:32 +0100, R.S. wrote:
>Back to the question: Who don't use TKE? I bet (and I'm pretty sure of
>that) all the shops in Poland do not use TKE.
>Justification: MONEY. No real need to use TKE.
It has been my opinion for several years that entering the master keys is a
hardw
Current thoughts from IBM ATS which can probably be considered canon on this
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP101229
My thoughts for what they are worth. You may not see a large amount of benefit
now with your configuration on a z10 but it is probably the right di
One of my favourite tricks is to use the ISPF editor to Exclude the lines I
don't want, and then issue the SUB NX command. Only the JCL in the
non-excluded lines will be submitted.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:58, Scott Ford wrote:
> Hey Gil,
>
> Is the IF/THEN assuming, big word here, that the 1
> We have a 2097-504(E12). Does anyone know if turing on Hiper Dispatching
> on a single book box machine would make a difference in performance?
According to "IBM System z10 Business Class Technical Overview"
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247632.pdf
at page 153-154 in topic 7.3.12
Yes, like your cars, you put them in the parking place if you don't need
them.
If you have 4 online processors and you have only work for 2 or 3, it is
more efficient to park #4 and dispatch the work to only 3 processors.
That's what hyperdispatch does (amongst others).
Kees.
"gsg" wrote in mess
Parking?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I'd've said there was an additional benefit through parking of logical
engines.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
Mainframe Performance Consultant, zChampion
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
ht
"Bob Shannon" wrote in message
news:<58FC7F986FCB804286E23B59DECF420F334E6230@nwt-s-mbx1.rocketsoftware
.com>...
> > Does anyone know if turning on Hiper Dispatching on a single book
box machine would make a >difference in performance?
>
> The answer is yes, but I believe with your configuration
Yes. I have authorization.
From: "Veilleux, Jon L"
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: VARY ON/ VARY OFF COMMAND IN BATCH
Did you check to see if you had console authority?
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Yes. I tried Alan Starr's suggestion and it worked.
From: Itschak Mugzach
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2012 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: VARY ON/ VARY OFF COMMAND IN BATCH
Did you CONSPROFed the console first?
ITschak
On Thu, Feb 23, 201
> Does anyone know if turning on Hiper Dispatching on a single book box machine
> would make a >difference in performance?
The answer is yes, but I believe with your configuration the answer is no.
Hiper Dispatch tries to dispatch the work on a subset of logical processors.
Since you only have
Looking for this information, I found these:
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tivoli/features/ccr2/ccr2-2008-04/article
3.html
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/tivoli/features/ccr2/ccr2-2008-05/article
5.html
Hope this helps,
Kees.
"gsg" wrote in message
news:<7794429104709271.wa.gsg808yahoo@ba
An SMS volume with any SMS managed dataset will also have a VVDS.
:>: -Original Message-
:>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
:>: Behalf Of Mike Schwab
:>: Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 4:57 AM
:>: To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:>: Subject: Re: VVDS with no
If the VVDS was created automatically by SMS when the first dataset was
created on the volume, then it was catalogued in the same catalog as that
dataset. Usually, the dataset is a user dataset and the VVDS ends up being
catalogued in the corresponding user catalog. However, LISTCAT (which
produc
In <003c01ccf1c8$b6b6d390$24247ab0$@net>, on 02/22/2012
at 05:16 PM, Ron Hawkins said:
>Of course, I'd expect any claim to refer to current FBA drives
>and not a RAMAC I.
Why? Or does NSA have a time machine? I would expect them to be more
willing to disclose what they can do with old hardwa
On 2/24/2012 9:00 AM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Can you please elaborate is this a parameter on VERBEXIT SUMDUMP
CR2 is a register on the machine.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http:/
We have a 2097-504(E12). Does anyone know if turing on Hiper Dispatching on a
single book box machine would make a difference in performance?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to li
Can you please elaborate is this a parameter on VERBEXIT SUMDUMP
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 7:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DU-AL in IPCS dump
CR2 -> D
Hey Gil,
Is the IF/THEN assuming, big word here, that the 1 is a return code, just a
thought
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Feb 24, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:52:38 -0500, Bill Ashton wrote:
>
>> I use thi
Decode the following to find the explanation:
ARC1001I PNGG00.IT3PCK.CSDITB.D0.KS250 RECALL FAILED, RC=0069,
REAS=0477
HTH,
I'm trying to recall a data set migrated to ML2. The recall fails due to
errors found in either the VVDS or VTOC. Is there somebody that would be
able to point me in the
Same here from me Lizette.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
As Lizette points out this is a fairly large file, do you have any msgs. in
Jeslog such as B-37?
What is the value of Volcount?
SETSYS VOLCOUNT(ANY) will allow expansion to a secondary volume.
ANY specifies for DFSMShsm to pass the VOLCOUNT(ANY) parameter to DFSMSdss
during the ARECOVER of data
>
> A VSAM dataset was never created on that volume.
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Buckton, T. (Theo)
wrote:
> > Hi There,
> >
> > Please explain why not all VVDSs catalog pointers. When doing a listcat,
the return is
> as follows:
> >
> > IDC3012I ENTRY SYS1.VVDS.VAPBPC7 NOT FOUND+ IDC15
As these are SMS managed volumes, a VVDS will be allocated with the first
dataset allocated to that volume regardless of DSORG. See Defining a VVDS
(catalog Volume Data Set) in z/OS V1R11.0 DFSMS Managing Catalogs.
Also from the same section:
A VVDS is defined with the name SYS1.VVDS.Vvolser, wh
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:52:38 -0500, Bill Ashton wrote:
>I use this sort of trick often for controlling sections of JCL, For
>example, I might have a step or two that deletes and allocates files, then
>another step that processes data into the new files, and finally a step
>that prints report files
A VSAM dataset was never created on that volume.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Buckton, T. (Theo)
wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> Please explain why not all VVDSs catalog pointers. When doing a listcat, the
> return is as follows:
>
> IDC3012I ENTRY SYS1.VVDS.VAPBPC7 NOT FOUND+
> IDC1566I ** SYS1.VVDS
CR2 -> DUCT
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:35:52 -0500 Micheal Butz
wrote:
:>In a ipcs dump where can I see a TCBs. DU-AL
:>
:>Sent from my iPhone
:>
:>--
:>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
:>send email to
>
> Hi There,
>
> I'm trying to recall a data set migrated to ML2. The recall fails due to
errors found in
> either the VVDS or VTOC. Is there somebody that would be able to point me
in the
> right direction of investigation
>
> PAGE 0001 5695-DF175 DFSMSDSS V1R12.0 DATA SET SERVICES 20
And why would the data set shows as online whilst the HSM recall is still in
progress?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Buckton, T. (Theo)
Sent: 24 February 2012 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: HSM Recall Failure
Donald
Since you appear to be writing the TCP client program, one way you can provide
a "connection timeout" is to set up a non-blocking connect() call and then
apply a "timeout" using the select() call.
Please note that the greater concentration of expertise in matters to do with
the z/OS Com
Hi There,
I'm trying to recall a data set migrated to ML2. The recall fails due to errors
found in either the VVDS or VTOC. Is there somebody that would be able to point
me in the right direction of investigation
PAGE 0001 5695-DF175 DFSMSDSS V1R12.0 DATA SET SERVICES 2012.055 11:55
AD
Hi There,
Please explain why not all VVDSs catalog pointers. When doing a listcat, the
return is as follows:
IDC3012I ENTRY SYS1.VVDS.VAPBPC7 NOT FOUND+
IDC1566I ** SYS1.VVDS.VAPBPC7 NOT LISTED
IDC0014I LASTCC=4
36 matches
Mail list logo
