Art wrote:
We look for... DFSVC000 (SVC)
Close. DFSVC000 is the SCD control block which at +C has an SVC
instruction with the IMS type-2 SVC as the SVC number.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I've got to change about 1,000 members of a PDS containing JCL by adding
2 lines to the end of each member.
I thought there might be a way to do this with IEBUPDTE, but he requires
sequence numbers, which a lot of the members don't have. And it also looks
like you can't just tell him
Not very pretty
//COPSTEP EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DISP=SHR,DSN=my.pds(MEMBERNAME)
// DD *
Some kind of junk
More junk
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUT2 DD DISP=(SHR),DSN= my.pds(MEMBERNAME)
Ah yeah, good thought. That
structure and in the started task code, included CIB logic to accept a
MODIFY command to SNAP dump the contents of the list entry based on the
entry name. If this CF code is code that you're maintaining, I'd certainly
recommend doing something similar.
Adam Johanson
IMS Systems Programming
USAA
problems... So be careful.
Adam Johanson
IMS Systems Programming
USAA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
the server address space, but it doesn't; it's the
same ASID for the batch job.
Am I not understanding something correctly?
Thanks in advance,
Adam Johanson
IMS Systems Programming, USAA
--
For IBM-MAIN
I'm starting to think that the ASID that I'm looking at (from ASCBASID) is
the home ASID, rather than the primary ASID, which does change for the
space-switch.
Yes, no?
- Adam
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Yeah, Alan, just as I was thinking more about it, that thought came to me
and I posted it.
Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
Wayne,
Yeah, I'm getting the ASCB from PSAAOLD and my confusion was that I
didn't know that the ASCBASID is for the home address space, rather than the
primary.
Thanks,
Adam Johanson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Cool. And it turns out ASCBASID isn't really for the home address space, but
when I picked the ASID out of PSAAOLD, that points to the home address
space's ASCB.
- Adam
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
recall seeing it
documented in the IMS Diagnosis GR that they do this.
Adam Johanson
IMS Systems Programming
USAA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
in there, but I'm curious as to what the
original
purpose was of it.
Thanks.
Adam Johanson
IMS Systems Programming
USAA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message
, there's not much
mention of it and the presentation looks incomplete. There's no adios
or questions? slide and the presentation just seems to stop in the middle.
Adam Johanson
IMS Systems Programming
USAA
--
For IBM-MAIN
Peter,
Thanks for that explanation on PSWREGS. That explains my PSWREGS
Woes that I was having yesterday. I misunderstood the following from the
Friendly Manual:
If a mask bit is off and any lower-order mask bit is on, the corresponding
storage area must be included in the parameter list.
What's in the PRB for the program that issued the SDUMP?
SYSTRACE entry:
00 0045 007FF050 SVCR33
TCB:
007FF050 007FDBC0 007B5FE8 | ..{.#¬Y |
RBP field in TCB (4 bytes before this is shown since it's the WLIC):
007FDBBC
And then as an aside after I chased all those RBs I realized that I could
simply do a SUMM FORMAT and do a FIND for all the WLICs. I'm ready for the
weekend...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
When programatically taking an SVC dump, I incorrectly assumed that when
I did a ST REGS that I would see my registers at the time the SVC 51 was
issued, but they're all zeroes.
So I thought that I would find the SVRB and get the registers that way. So
I grab the TCB address from SYSTRACE,
Yeah and unfortunately, I'm having trouble with it. I'm getting a x'3908'
in R15 which means that the length of my parmlist is invalid. So maybe y'all
could help me there:
ocbitmask,incgpr
sdumpx hdrad=(2),
idad=(3),
type=failrc,
pswregs=regslist,
If the fields are 36 characters, why are 37 being displayed?
Must just be how PL/I does it with the PUT SKIP LIST. I just ran a hello
world program with no spaces at the end, but it printed out an additional one.
A previous poster asked me put post all relevant delcarations, assignment
Subject: Re: Healther checker documentation
From: Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 14:42:22 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on
05/16/2008
12:46:13 AM:
I
::APUBLISHCSPEC255 UTECEGDB 00:
0FCDECDCECCEDCCFFF44EECC4FF04
1F1742392832753255004353574200010
Any input is appreciated. Thanks.
Adam Johanson
IMS Systems Programming
USAA
--
For IBM
(36)
BASED(HLDCEGR_PTR);
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:41:27 -0500, Adam Johanson
adam.johan...@usaa.com wrote:
Could someone explain how this is happening? It appears that the source for
an assignment statement is changed after the move. Here is an excerpt from
Is there some utility out there where you supply as input the CEEROPT load
module, and the utility reports on what options it specifies?
I'd hate to write one only to find out that I re-invented the wheel...
Thanks.
Adam Johanson
IMS Systems Programming
USAA
It's for an IMS MPR. We're at z/OS 1.9.
What I'd really like is for the utility to take the load module, and output
the
CEEXOPT macro, complete with options contained in the CEEROPT module.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
I know that there are LOAD/DELETE macros for a certain load module
coming from another load module. I am trying to capture these events. What I
had in mind was starting a GTF trace for SVCs 8 and 9 and setting a SLIP trap
that specified as its DATA parameter (0R?,EQ,[module name]) and its RANGE
BNE vs. BNZ:
You know, that this is exactly the same condition mask of the BC machine
instruction, do you?
Yeah, I was trying to say that BNZ is more intuitive, and it wouldn't have
made me verify that they had the same mask.
testing the condition
code here was BNZ rather than BNE since the previous instruction to set
the condition code was LTR and the operands will always be equal... Oh well,
I'll live.
Adam Johanson
IMS Systems Programming
USAA
) looked promising, but I must have missed
something about finding variables whose scope is local to a function of a class.
Thanks.
Adam Johanson
IMS Systems Programming
USAA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
28 matches
Mail list logo
