Not that I had any real interest but your ignorance in the mainframe
architecture would certainly eliminate any intention I could ever have of
running your product. If you knew more about the design and what protects the
mainframe you would know why most (if not all) hacks wouldn't work in a
We are planning to move our zSeries disk from our 2105-800 to an EMC DMX4
disk array later this year. Currently the 2105 is mirrored and that is what we
are probably going to do on the DMX. I believe the 2105 also stripes the
zSeries logical volumes across multiple little SCSI disks. The
If you want to transfer a binary file from z/OS to z/OS with non-z/OS
intermediate nodes, then I'd strongly suggest that you use
QUOTE SITE STRU R
to use record structure. This encodes the file so that record
boundries are kept. I've done this to transfer files in the past from
z/OS to Windows,
On Thu, 31 May 2007 09:15:09 -0400, Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Most 106-F abends are related to extents.
Activating a new LNKLST set will result in that LNKLST set having all the
current extents in its DEB so no 106-F would occur when using that LNKLST
set unless the data set was
Can I run the version of DFSORT that is installed on my z/OS 1.4 system on
my z/OS 1.7 system via JOBLIB in the batch jobs?
If so, which libraries would I need to add to the JOBLIB (both JCL sort and
program invoked sort are used in the application if that matters) and are there
any APF
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:29:12 -0700, Frank Yaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's not clear to me what you're seeing here, but ...
The main difference between DFSORT R14 and z/OS DFSORT V1R5 is that
V1R5
can use Memory Object Sorting, a completely new path. Perhaps what you're
seeing is caused by
Would DFSORT at release 1.4 (z/OS 1.4 and I think OS/390 2.10) using
EQUALS=VBLKSET produce the same results run after run if the input data
were the same but produce different results when run under DFSORT 1.5 (All
jobs ran with EQUALS=N)? I know what EQUALS= does, it's just that the
results
You might also want to go to the 'problem solving' page (via link just
under the 'fixes' link along the left side of the window). If you look at
the alert types listed, there is one listed on the 'problem solving' page
that isn't listed on the 'fixes' page (at least it's that way under my
My personal opinion is that the universities have
bamboozled the business community into believing that they really
train people for running data centers.
I don't know if it's the universities, did you see the
SearchDataCenter.com article on best places to build a new data center.
Since your not getting much I will try to help.
When I get the email from IBM it takes me to a site that provides several
links (looks something like the following):
Download expires on 20 Feb 2007
Packing List for Service Order#
View Now (0.045 MB)
Service Overview for Order#
Oops, just reread your post. My instructions are for receiving 'service'.
I have no idea if the process for products is even close to the same. If
not, ignore me, sorry.
Sorry,
Greg
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
I brought up my sandbox LPAR in my basic sysplex for testing of z/OS 1.7.
The other systems are z/OS 1.4. We use WLM managed JES2 initiators where
the work is assigned to one of four services classes with varying velocity
goals. When running batch jobs on my 1.7 system, jobs for two of my 4
Thank you all for your assistance and confirmation on this. The
participants on this list are great and help so many! I really appreciate
that so many out there take their own time to help others.
Thanks again,
Greg
--
For
I have checked the manuals and the archives on this and I am still unsure
about mixing the yes and no values for SYNCHRES in a GRSPlex (Basic
sysplex if that matters any). I need to bring my TEST LPAR into our plex
for testing. I would rather wait until either our outage weekend next
month
My choice would be to stick with SMP/E and not waste the time to create
something else. I am not sure what is considered so difficult about SMP
(from a customer perspective, I have never been a packager). The only
time I find it difficult is when you stick something like Omegamons CICAT
in
I am updating our WLM policy to add report classes. The existing policy
doesn't have any SPM entries in the subsystem type STC rules. In RTFM it
appears that entries of a type SPM should exist for SYSSTC and SYSTEM. It
also appears they should be pretty early in the list so I added them and
Charles,
I am curious what security disaster exists with each of the users that
will use this process having a userid.NETRC file with a UACC(NONE) be? If
it is the OPERATIONS ATTRIBUTE users being able to access the files that
is hte problem, if they are all in a single group (or limited groups)
Charles,
Thank you for your reply. It sounds like the individual NETRC files may
not really be a security disaster but more of a maintenance disaster. I
would agree, it is very inconvenient to require each user to update the
NETRC file each time the password(s) on the remote system(s) change.
I would be surprised if Barbara does this for standard timechanges.
Either way, why do you? If for some reason you have to set GMT=LOCAL and
run with no offset, then why not set up the new CDS's in advance and point
to a different couple member during daylight savings (or standard, which-
ever).
I like it. My shop could make use of a function like that if it worked in
a basic sysplex (no CF, no need or $$ for one). Also, no unauthorized
program interface desired :)
Greg
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
In case all the sharp guys have gone home I will attempt to help you
some. It looks like you have message areas defined so the top part of the
screen is full with non-scrollable (or is that non-deletable?) messages.
You need to clear these, I prefer the 'put the cursor under the * and
press
Steve,
Another good place to get a list of the FMID's installed on your system
with a description is the Migration Assistant using the SMP/E panels. I
don't think you even have to download the Software Information Base
anymore but I could be wrong. Either way more information and the
Software
22 matches
Mail list logo
