I'm trying to use the IBM Debug Tool to list some data names during a Batch
run, with the DT commands in INSPIN, and capturing the responses in INSPLOG.
All is well, until I attempt to continue a command onto a second line. Since
it's a COBOL program that's running, I start the command in 8,
Previously, I said:
Two replies I received suggested that I copy the LRECL=32756 datasets to
a smaller LRECL, and compare those. I didn't put much hope in this
because I had already run the compare overriding both input LRECLs to be
29175, and I have had considerable success for many
Sam, Clark Harry;
Thanks for your replies; I appreciate the time you spent helping me.
Michael
Michael Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:38:32
-0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How-TO: Non-production CA-7 usage
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
I'd like to use CA-7 to automate jobs, but in our shop it takes literally
2+ months of 1970's paperwork to get a job start approved, and there are no
guarantees that it will be accepted. One only has to attempt this once to
never try it again. So our current solution to this obtuse behavior is
We have had some kind of implementation of tn3270 TAKEOVER that always
destroys the TSO session. Our job idle timeout is 30 minutes, but with
this ridiculous implementation TSO is now 1-2 seconds. The reason?
Security.
Apparently it's irrelevant that a tn3270 client attempting to reconnect to
a
This note is cross-posted to IBM-MAIN TSO-REXX
Does anyone find the TSO Session Manager of use when tracing execs executed
in ISPF? (Or anything else?)
I test almost all my code in TSOBATCH using trace, and I feel productive
doing this; I can scroll backwards and forwards. But I have an
Two replies I received suggested that I copy the LRECL=32756 datasets to a
smaller LRECL, and compare those. I didn't put much hope in this because I
had already run the compare overriding both input LRECLs to be 29175, and I
have had considerable success for many years overriding DCBs. So I was
This is cross-posted to ISPF-L IBM-MAIN because SUPERC is a widely used
utility.
I'm attempting to compare two files, with DCB LRECL=32756, BLKSIZE=32760 /
0, and RECFM=VB, and the max actual record length of 29171. When I use the
UPDLDEL (update long control) option, I get a DELTA file with no
George,
===
Yesterday, I asked IBM a question on ibm.advantis.net. The question was:
what port number to I use to gain access of IBMLink from PC/3270? I'm
still waiting on an answer, but this morning the web site for IBMLink is
down. Does anyone on the list know the answer to
George,
==
Snip refer to port 23 in the recent discussions.
That's the port I'm using, but it's not working...I'm getting a comm
error 657...Any ideas?
==
Can't find any reference in BookManager quickly. Sorry
Michael
John,
==
…we are expanding our storage by about 1.5TB and moving to a DMX3…
…as part of this process EMC is stating that we need to do a
REFORMAT VTOC across our farm…
…have not been able to pin the whys and hows down…
…might someone have the whys and hows?
Tom,
==
What I have been told is that z/OS no longer uses the alternate tracks, so
the reformat removes them from the VTOC.
Frankly, I haven't looked into this deep enough to know how you would ever
get a bad track since there is so little use of real 3390 disk volumes
Darren,
===
Does any one know if Eztrieve+ on the mainframe currently supports
calling LE compiled functions in DLL modules? Or if there is planned
future support for it? (See OS390 Cobol EXPORT ALL, IMPORT CODE)
===
I just searched BookManager for 6.4
Hi,
I'm trying to determine if our outsourcer vendor is backing up our datasets.
Here are the facts:
A. When I do a LISTC ENT() CL HIST, all 200+ of our Endevor VSAM files have the
same MANAGEMENTCLASS---MCLASX, the same LBACKUP 000.000. (which I
interpret to mean never backed up.
14 matches
Mail list logo
